Assembly Bill 86
Providing complementary and alternative health care practitioners with exemptions from practice protection laws, requirements and prohibitions for individuals who provide complementary and alternative health care services, and providing a penalty. (FE)
Vetoed by the governor
Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Feb 4, 2022. Lawmakers did not , so it stands.
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 18, 2021
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Jan 20, 2022
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed 21 to 12
-
Governor, stopped here
Vetoed Feb 4, 2022.
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2022: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill does the following: 1) establishes certain requirements and prohibitions for complementary and alternative health care (CAHC) practitioners;
2) provides exemptions for CAHC practitioners from prohibitions against acting without certain health-care related licenses, certifications, and other credentials if they comply with provisions in the bill; and 3) provides the Department of Safety and Professional Services with authority to investigate and take action against a CAHC practitioner for violating a provision in the bill.
Read the full summary Show less
Under current law, DSPS, in conjunction with a number of credentialing boards attached to DSPS, regulates and provides for the credentialing of various types of health-care professions. Current law contains numerous prohibitions against engaging in certain health-care related practices and against using titles associated with certain health-care related professions without a required credential.
The bill establishes certain requirements pertaining to CAHC practitioners, which are not specifically regulated or required to hold a specific credential under current law. The bill requires a CAHC practitioner to provide to each client, before first providing CAHC services to the client, certain information in a plainly worded written statement, including the following: 1) information about the CAHC practitioner; 2) a notice explaining that the CAHC practitioner is not practicing under a health-care related credential granted by the state; 3) information about the nature of the service to be provided; and 4) a list of any degrees, training, experience, or other qualification that the CAHC practitioner has.
The bill requires a CAHC practitioner, before providing CAHC services to a client, to obtain a written and signed acknowledgement from the client stating that the client has received the information required to be provided. The bill requires the CAHC practitioner to provide a copy of the acknowledgement to the client and to retain a copy of it for at least two years.
The bill prohibits a person from acting as a CAHC practitioner if the person is or was a credentialed health care professional and had his or her credential revoked or suspended, unless the credential was subsequently reinstated; if the person was convicted of certain felonies and has not completed his or her sentence; or if the person is an individual found incompetent by a court.
The bill also prohibits a CAHC practitioner from taking other specific actions, including the following: 1) taking certain actions with respect to prescription drugs;
2) recommending the discontinuation of treatment that is prescribed by a health care professional; 3) making a diagnosis of a medical disease; or 4) holding himself or herself out as a credentialed health care professional without a credential.
The bill provides that a CAHC practitioner does not violate any of the prohibitions against engaging in the practices of medicine and surgery, midwifery, nurse-midwifery, professional nursing, chiropractic, dentistry, perfusion, respiratory care, physical therapy, podiatry, occupational therapy, optometry, psychology, psychotherapy, clinical social work, marriage and family therapy, professional counseling, pharmacy, speech pathology, audiology, acupuncture, cosmetology, massage or bodywork therapy, and selling and fitting hearing aids; the prohibition against claiming to provide dietetic services; or the prohibitions against acting as a physician assistant or as an ambulance service provider, with respect to the provision of CAHC services to a client, if the CAHC practitioner provides that client with the statement required under the bill and does not violate the prohibitions in the bill.
Who's behind it
14 representatives are its . All 14 are Republicans.
3 more lawmakers .
See all 17 names Hide the names
Authors (14)
- Calvin Callahan · Republican, Assembly
- Barbara Dittrich · Republican, Assembly
- James Edming · Republican, Assembly
- Cody Horlacher · Republican, Assembly
- Joel Kitchens · Republican, Assembly
- Clint Moses · Republican, Assembly
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- Donna Rozar · Republican, Assembly
- Michael Schraa · Republican, Assembly
- Ken Skowronski · Republican, Assembly
- Shae Sortwell · Republican, Assembly
- Chuck Wichgers · Republican, Assembly
- Shannon Zimmerman · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (3)
- Kathleen Bernier · Republican, Senate
- Mary Felzkowski · Republican, Senate
- Dale Kooyenga · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 4 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Health vote on an amendment
Passed, 15 to 0 · Jan 18, 2022
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Health vote to recommend it
Passed, 10 to 5 · Jan 18, 2022
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 10, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 21, 2022
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 21 to 12 · Jan 25, 2022
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (21)
- Alberta Darling (R, 8)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Dale Kooyenga (R, 5)
- Dan Feyen (R, 20)
- Devin LeMahieu (R, 9)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Eric Wimberger (R, 2)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Jerry Petrowski (R, 29)
- Joan Ballweg (R, 14)
- John Jagler (R, 13)
- Julian Bradley (R, 28)
- Kathleen Bernier (R, 23)
- Mary Felzkowski (R, 12)
- Patrick Testin (R, 24)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Rob Stafsholt (R, 10)
- Roger Roth (R, 19)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
No (12)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Brad Pfaff (D, 32)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Janet Bewley (D, 25)
- Janis Ringhand (D, 15)
- Jeff Smith (D, 31)
- Jon Erpenbach (D, 27)
- Kelda Roys (D, 26)
- LaTonya Johnson (D, 6)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Melissa Agard (D, 16)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 17, 2022
The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.
-
Feb 4, 2022
The governor vetoed it.
-
Feb 1, 2022
Sent to the governor.
-
Jan 25, 2022
The Senate passed it too, 21 to 12.
-
Jan 21, 2022
“Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Jan 21, 2022
Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.
-
Jan 20, 2022
The Senate received it.
-
Jan 20, 2022
The Assembly passed it.
-
Jan 20, 2022
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Jan 18, 2022
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Jan 18, 2022
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 5.
-
Jul 29, 2021
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 22, 2021
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 18, 2021
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health.
-
Feb 18, 2021
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 18, 2021 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Dittrich, Horlacher, Kitchens, Murphy, Mursau, Schraa, Skowronski, Wichgers, Zimmerman, Callahan, Edming, Sortwell, Moses and Rozar; cosponsored by Senators Felzkowski, Kooyenga and Bernier
- Feb 18, 2021 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Health
- Feb 22, 2021 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 14, 2021 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Dittrich
- Jul 29, 2021 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Sep 22, 2021 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Dittrich
- Oct 19, 2021 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Dittrich
- Jan 12, 2022 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 10, Noes 5
- Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 1-20-2022 by Committee on Rules
- Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly
Taken from the table
- Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted
- Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 20, 2022 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Jan 21, 2022 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Jan 21, 2022 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 21, 2022 · Senate
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jan 21, 2022 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-25-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Jan 25, 2022 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jan 25, 2022 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 25, 2022 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Jan 25, 2022 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 21, Noes 12
- Jan 25, 2022 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Jan 31, 2022 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 1-31-2022
- Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 2-1-2022
- Feb 4, 2022 · Assembly
Report vetoed by the Governor on 2-4-2022
- May 17, 2022 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
- May 17, 2022 · Assembly
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
Terms on this page
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote