Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Assembly Bill 86

Providing complementary and alternative health care practitioners with exemptions from practice protection laws, requirements and prohibitions for individuals who provide complementary and alternative health care services, and providing a penalty. (FE)

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Feb 4, 2022. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 18, 2021

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jan 20, 2022

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 21 to 12

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Feb 4, 2022.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2022: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill does the following: 1) establishes certain requirements and prohibitions for complementary and alternative health care (CAHC) practitioners;

2) provides exemptions for CAHC practitioners from prohibitions against acting without certain health-care related licenses, certifications, and other credentials if they comply with provisions in the bill; and 3) provides the Department of Safety and Professional Services with authority to investigate and take action against a CAHC practitioner for violating a provision in the bill.

Read the full summary

Under current law, DSPS, in conjunction with a number of credentialing boards attached to DSPS, regulates and provides for the credentialing of various types of health-care professions. Current law contains numerous prohibitions against engaging in certain health-care related practices and against using titles associated with certain health-care related professions without a required credential.

The bill establishes certain requirements pertaining to CAHC practitioners, which are not specifically regulated or required to hold a specific credential under current law. The bill requires a CAHC practitioner to provide to each client, before first providing CAHC services to the client, certain information in a plainly worded written statement, including the following: 1) information about the CAHC practitioner; 2) a notice explaining that the CAHC practitioner is not practicing under a health-care related credential granted by the state; 3) information about the nature of the service to be provided; and 4) a list of any degrees, training, experience, or other qualification that the CAHC practitioner has.

The bill requires a CAHC practitioner, before providing CAHC services to a client, to obtain a written and signed acknowledgement from the client stating that the client has received the information required to be provided. The bill requires the CAHC practitioner to provide a copy of the acknowledgement to the client and to retain a copy of it for at least two years.

The bill prohibits a person from acting as a CAHC practitioner if the person is or was a credentialed health care professional and had his or her credential revoked or suspended, unless the credential was subsequently reinstated; if the person was convicted of certain felonies and has not completed his or her sentence; or if the person is an individual found incompetent by a court.

The bill also prohibits a CAHC practitioner from taking other specific actions, including the following: 1) taking certain actions with respect to prescription drugs;

2) recommending the discontinuation of treatment that is prescribed by a health care professional; 3) making a diagnosis of a medical disease; or 4) holding himself or herself out as a credentialed health care professional without a credential.

The bill provides that a CAHC practitioner does not violate any of the prohibitions against engaging in the practices of medicine and surgery, midwifery, nurse-midwifery, professional nursing, chiropractic, dentistry, perfusion, respiratory care, physical therapy, podiatry, occupational therapy, optometry, psychology, psychotherapy, clinical social work, marriage and family therapy, professional counseling, pharmacy, speech pathology, audiology, acupuncture, cosmetology, massage or bodywork therapy, and selling and fitting hearing aids; the prohibition against claiming to provide dietetic services; or the prohibitions against acting as a physician assistant or as an ambulance service provider, with respect to the provision of CAHC services to a client, if the CAHC practitioner provides that client with the statement required under the bill and does not violate the prohibitions in the bill.

Who's behind it

14 representatives are its ⁠. All 14 are Republicans.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 17 names

Authors (14)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Health vote on an amendment

Passed, 15 to 0 · Jan 18, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Health vote to recommend it

Passed, 10 to 5 · Jan 18, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 10, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 21, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 21 to 12 · Jan 25, 2022

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 17, 2022

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Feb 4, 2022

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Feb 1, 2022

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Jan 25, 2022

    The Senate passed it too, 21 to 12.

  5. Jan 21, 2022

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  6. Jan 21, 2022

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  7. Jan 20, 2022

    The Senate received it.

  8. Jan 20, 2022

    The Assembly passed it.

  9. Jan 20, 2022

    The Assembly adopted it.

  10. Jan 18, 2022

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  11. Jan 18, 2022

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 5.

  12. Jul 29, 2021

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Feb 22, 2021

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Feb 18, 2021

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health.

  15. Feb 18, 2021

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 18, 2021 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Dittrich, Horlacher, Kitchens, Murphy, Mursau, Schraa, Skowronski, Wichgers, Zimmerman, Callahan, Edming, Sortwell, Moses and Rozar; cosponsored by Senators Felzkowski, Kooyenga and Bernier

  2. Feb 18, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Health

  3. Feb 22, 2021 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 14, 2021 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Dittrich

  5. Jul 29, 2021 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Sep 22, 2021 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Dittrich

  7. Oct 19, 2021 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Dittrich

  8. Jan 12, 2022 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  10. Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 10, Noes 5

  11. Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  12. Jan 18, 2022 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-20-2022 by Committee on Rules

  13. Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  14. Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly

    Taken from the table

  15. Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  16. Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

  17. Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  19. Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  20. Jan 20, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Jan 20, 2022 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  22. Jan 21, 2022 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  23. Jan 21, 2022 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  24. Jan 21, 2022 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  25. Jan 21, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-25-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  26. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Read a second time

  27. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  28. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  29. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 21, Noes 12

  30. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  31. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  32. Jan 31, 2022 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 1-31-2022

  33. Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 2-1-2022

  34. Feb 4, 2022 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 2-4-2022

  35. May 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  36. May 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote