Skip to content

Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session

AB 903

Vetoed Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: programs for gifted and talented pupils. (FE)

Children — Special educational needs Public instruction department of School — Board Teacher Workforce development department of

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, stopped here
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, each school board must ensure that pupils who have been

identified as gifted and talented have access to a gifted and talented program. For

purposes of this requirement, current law defines a “gifted and talented pupil" as a

pupil enrolled in a public school who gives evidence of high performance capability

in intellectual, creative, artistic, leadership, or specific academic areas and who

needs services or activities not ordinarily provided in a regular school program in

order to fully develop such capabilities.

Under the bill, each school board must submit an annual report to the

Department of Public Instruction that indicates whether the school board employs

a gifted and talented program coordinator and, if it does, the amount of time the

coordinator spends on the school board's gifted and talented program; the number

of gifted and talented pupils enrolled in the school district who received services

under a gifted and talented program; and certain demographic information for those

pupils. The bill also requires DPI to annually post on DPI's Internet site all of the

following information:

1. For each school district: a) the number of pupils who were evaluated for and

identified as a gifted and talented pupil; b) the number of pupils who received

services under a gifted and talented program and certain demographic data

regarding those pupils; c) whether the school district has complied with its duty to

provide access to a gifted and talented program; d) the services and activities

provided to pupils under the school district's program for gifted and talented pupils;

and e) whether the school district employs a gifted and talented program coordinator

and, if it does, the amount of time the coordinator spends on the gifted and talented

program.

2. For each gifted and talented program grant recipient, the services and

activities that the entity provided to gifted and talented pupils.

3. The statewide pupil participation rate in advanced placement courses.

DPI also must notify the appropriate standing committees of the legislature

that the information is available on DPI's Internet site.

Additionally, under the bill, DPI annually must audit at least 10 percent of

school districts, which must be selected at random, for compliance with the

requirements under current law and the bill. Finally, DPI must include in the school

and school district accountability report, commonly known as school and school

district report cards, DPI's determination of whether or not a school district complied

with the state law requirements related to programs for gifted and talented pupils.

Under current law, the Department of Workforce Development awards

workforce training grants, under what is commonly known as the Fast Forward

Program, for various workforce training purposes. One of the purposes under

current law is to provide grants for programs that train teachers and that train

individuals to become teachers. This bill expands that purpose to explicitly include

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Armstrong (R) , Callahan (R) , Dittrich (R) , Edming (R) , James (R) , Krug (R) , Novak (R) , Petryk (R)

4 cosponsors

Bernier (R) , Darling (R) , Felzkowski (R) , Wichgers (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 8, Noes 4

Passed 8–4 Feb 17, 2022 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 4, Noes 3

Passed 4–3 Mar 4, 2022 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jan 21, 2022 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Petryk, Armstrong, Callahan, Dittrich, Edming, James, Krug and Novak; cosponsored by Senators Bernier, Darling and Felzkowski

  2. Jan 21, 2022 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Education

  3. Jan 31, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Wichgers added as a coauthor

  4. Feb 1, 2022 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 2, 2022 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Feb 2, 2022 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Feb 10, 2022 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 8, Noes 4

  9. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-22-2022 by Committee on Rules

  11. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  12. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  14. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  15. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  17. Feb 24, 2022 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Education

  18. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  19. Mar 4, 2022 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  20. Mar 4, 2022 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 4, Noes 3

  21. Mar 4, 2022 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  22. Mar 4, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-8-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  23. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Read a second time

  24. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  26. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 20, Noes 12

  27. Mar 8, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Mar 9, 2022 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  29. Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-15-2022

  30. Apr 4, 2022 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-4-2022 by directive of the Speaker

  31. Apr 8, 2022 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-8-2022

  32. May 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  33. May 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82