Assembly Bill 909
The managed forest land program. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 8, 2022. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jan 25, 2022
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 23, 2022
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Mar 8, 2022
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2021 Wisconsin Act 230
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 8, 2022: “Published 4-9-2022”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill makes numerous changes to the managed forest land (MFL) program administered by the Department of Natural Resources.
Introduction Under current law, certain forested land may be designated as MFL under a program administered by DNR. Under this program, the owner of land designated as MFL makes an annual acreage share payment that is lower than, and in lieu of, the property taxes that normally would be payable. In exchange, the owner must comply with certain forestry practices and have a management plan prepared for the land. The owner must also open the MFL to the public for hunting, fishing, hiking, sight-seeing, and cross-country skiing, but may designate up to a certain number of acres as being closed to the public. For MFL that is designated as closed, the owner must pay an additional closed acreage fee. An owner seeking to have land designated as MFL submits an application to DNR that contains a management plan for the land. If the MFL meets the eligibility requirements under the program, which include minimum acreage requirements and requirements as to how much merchantable timber can be produced on the land, DNR approves the application and issues an order designating the land as MFL. An owner may choose to have the order last 25 or 50 years.
Read the full summary Show less
Eligibility Under current law, a parcel of land is eligible for designation as MFL only if it consists of at least 20 contiguous acres. This was increased from a minimum of 10 acres under 2015 Wisconsin Act 358 . Under current law, the fact that a lake, river, stream, or flowage, a public or private road, or a railroad or utility right-of-way separates any part of the parcel from any other part does not render it noncontiguous. Under the bill, a parcel of land is eligible if it either consists of at least 20 contiguous acres or it consists of at least 10 contiguous acres and is located in a tract of land under the same ownership that contains at least one other parcel of at least 10 contiguous acres that meets the other eligibility requirements and for which designation under a single managed forest land order is sought. The bill requires that the owner of such a tract of land notify DNR of any sale or transfer of land not enrolled in MFL from the tract, as it may impact eligibility of the MFL parcels. Under the bill, the fact that a lake, river, stream, or flowage, a public or private road, or a railroad or utility right-of-way separates any part of the land from any other part does not render a parcel noncontiguous and does not render ownership of the land noncontiguous. These changes only apply to land designated as MFL by an order issued or renewed on or after April 16, 2016, which is the date on which the minimum acreage change and other eligibility changes under Act 358 first applied.
Under current law, land is not eligible for designation as MFL if a building or an improvement associated with a building is located on it. Current law specifies that an improvement includes any accessory building, structure, or fixture that is built or placed on the parcel for its benefit. The bill eliminates reference to an accessory building in the description of an improvement. The bill provides that the prohibition on buildings and improvements does not apply to a building used exclusively for storage. This change also only applies to land designated as MFL by an order issued or renewed on or after April 16, 2016.
Under current law, an owner of land that is designated as MFL may file an application with DNR to designate an additional parcel of land as MFL if the additional parcel is at least three acres in size and is contiguous to any of that designated land. Under the bill, such an additional parcel may be any size if contiguous to designated land under the same ownership, or not contiguous if it meets the minimum acreage requirements under the bill. The bill specifies that the eligibility requirements applicable to such an addition are the eligibility requirements under the order that designated the parcel to which the land is being added.
Material change to law Under current law, if a statute is enacted or a rule is promulgated during the period of an MFL order that materially changes the terms of the order, the landowner must elect between acceptance of modifications to the contract consistent with the provisions of the statute or rule or voluntary withdrawal of the land without penalty.
The bill adds that a statutory change does not constitute a material change to an order unless, in the act that makes the change, the legislature states that the act or a provision in the act makes a material change to orders entered into under prior law.
Under the bill, this first applies to the enactment of this bill, itself, which does not contain such a statement. Further, under the bill, a promulgated rule does not constitute a material change to an order unless the rule includes a statement that the rule constitutes a material change to orders entered into under prior rules and DNR includes in its report to the legislature on the proposed rule a statement that the rule constitutes a material change to orders entered into under prior rules and an analysis of this determination.
Withdrawal taxes and fees The bill clarifies that DNR is required to assess a withdrawal tax and fee against an owner of MFL who voluntarily withdraws part or all of a parcel, which was made unclear under Act 358.
Current law allows an owner of MFL to sell or otherwise transfer all or part of the owner's parcel of MFL, and the transferred land continues to be designated as MFL if it meets eligibility requirements and the transferee certifies to DNR an intent to comply with the existing management plan for the land and any amendments to the plan. If the transferred land does not meet eligibility requirements, current law requires DNR to issue an order withdrawing the land and to assess against the owner the withdrawal tax and fee. Under the bill, in this circumstance DNR may, but is not required to, assess the withdrawal tax and fee.
Under current law, an owner of MFL may request to withdraw part of a parcel and DNR must issue an order of withdrawal if DNR determines that the parcel is either unable to produce merchantable timber in the amount required by law or unsuitable, due to environmental, ecological, or economic concerns or factors, for the production of merchantable timber. Current law requires that the order withdraw only the number of acres necessary for the parcel to resume its ability to produce the required amount or to resume its sustainability to produce merchantable timber, and prohibits the assessment of a withdrawal tax or fee for the withdrawal. The bill adds that, if the land remaining in the parcel after the withdrawal does not meet eligibility requirements under the order designating the MFL, the order must withdraw the entire parcel, and if the land subject to the MFL order after the withdrawal does not meet the eligibility requirements under the MFL order, all land under the MFL order must be withdrawn. The bill maintains that the withdrawal order may not assess a withdrawal tax or fee.
Current law exempts certain transfers of MLF from the imposition of withdrawal taxes and fees, such as transfers for a public road or railroad or utility right-of-way. The bill adds such an exemption for transfers for a public purpose to a city, village, town, or county that is authorized to levy property taxes on the land.
Small land sales Under current law, generally an owner of MFL may voluntarily withdraw part of a parcel of the owner's land once per 25-year order and twice per 50-year order if the purpose for which the owner requests the withdrawal is for the sale of one to five acres of the land or for a construction site. Current law separately allows an owner of MFL to sell or transfer ownership of all or part of the owner's land an unlimited number of times per order. The bill harmonizes these provisions by removing the sale of land as a purpose for a voluntary withdrawal under the former.
Large ownerships The bill authorizes DNR to promulgate rules that subject large ownerships, meaning 1,000 or more acres of land designated as MFL under the same owner, to management plan requirements that deviate from the requirements that apply under statute.
Leasing The bill eliminates a provision authorizing an owner of MFL that is designated as closed to enter into a lease or other agreement for consideration that permits persons to engage in a recreational activity on the land. Under the bill, there are no prohibitions on leasing land under the MFL program.
Cutting Current law requires that a land owner who intends to cut merchantable timber on MFL to file with DNR a notice of intent to cut and request DNR's approval of the cutting. Current law requires DNR to approve such a cutting notice if the proposed cutting conforms to the management plan and is consistent with sound forestry practices. If not, current law requires DNR to help the owner to develop an acceptable proposal before approving the request. The bill specifies that cutting merchantable timber on MFL in a manner that is contrary to a management plan or a cutting notice is prohibited and that a violator may be subject to a forfeiture equal to 20 percent of the current value of the merchantable timber cut, based on the stumpage value, as well as withdrawal of all or a part of the MFL parcel.
Who's behind it
6 representatives are its . 5 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.
3 more lawmakers .
See all 9 names Hide the names
Authors (6)
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- Will Penterman · Republican, Assembly
- Ken Skowronski · Republican, Assembly
- Lee Snodgrass · Democrat, Assembly
- Chuck Wichgers · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (3)
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Mary Felzkowski · Republican, Senate
- Howard Marklein · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Forestry vote on an amendment
Passed, 14 to 0 · Feb 22, 2022
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Forestry, Parks and Outdoor Recreation, Ayes 14, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Forestry vote to recommend it
Passed, 12 to 2 · Feb 22, 2022
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Forestry, Parks and Outdoor Recreation, Ayes 12, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 4, 2022
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 8, 2022
The new law was published.
-
Apr 8, 2022
The governor signed it. It became 2021 Wisconsin Act 230.
-
Apr 4, 2022
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 8, 2022
The Senate passed it too.
-
Mar 4, 2022
“Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)
-
Mar 1, 2022
Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.
-
Mar 1, 2022
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 24, 2022
Sent to the Senate Committee on Insurance, Licensing and Forestry.
-
Feb 23, 2022
The Senate received it.
-
Feb 23, 2022
The Assembly passed it.
-
Feb 23, 2022
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Feb 22, 2022
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 22, 2022
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 2.
-
Feb 14, 2022
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 2, 2022
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 25, 2022
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Forestry, Parks and Outdoor Recreation.
-
Jan 25, 2022
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Mursau, Penterman, Knodl, Skowronski, Snodgrass and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Felzkowski, Ballweg and Marklein
- Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Forestry, Parks and Outdoor Recreation
- Feb 2, 2022 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 8, 2022 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Mursau
- Feb 9, 2022 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 14, 2022 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Forestry, Parks and Outdoor Recreation, Ayes 14, Noes 0
- Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Forestry, Parks and Outdoor Recreation, Ayes 12, Noes 2
- Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 9:06 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 23, 2022 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Feb 24, 2022 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Insurance, Licensing and Forestry
- Mar 1, 2022 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 1, 2022 · Senate
Withdrawn from committee on Insurance, Licensing and Forestry and rereferred to committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 46(2)(c)
- Mar 1, 2022 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 4, 2022 · Senate
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Mar 4, 2022 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-8-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 8, 2022 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 8, 2022 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 8, 2022 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 8, 2022 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 8, 2022 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 9, 2022 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly
LRB correction
- Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 3-15-2022
- Apr 4, 2022 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-4-2022 by directive of the Speaker
- Apr 8, 2022 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 4-8-2022. 2021 Wisconsin Act 230
- Apr 8, 2022 · Assembly
Published 4-9-2022
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote