Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Assembly Bill 934

Disenrollment of ineligible individuals from and redeterminations of eligibility for the Medical Assistance program and database confirmation for public assistance program eligibility. (FE)

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 15, 2022. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 31, 2022

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 17, 2022

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 20 to 13

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Apr 15, 2022.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2022: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes various changes to eligibility determinations for public assistance programs and, specifically, the Medical Assistance program. The Medical Assistance program is a joint federal and state program that provides health services to individuals who have limited financial resources.

The bill prohibits the Department of Health Services from automatically renewing the eligibility of a recipient for Medical Assistance program benefits. DHS must determine an individual's eligibility every six months under the bill. DHS is also prohibited from using prepopulated forms or otherwise supplying information, except for name and address, to a recipient of or an applicant for Medical Assistance that has been supplied to DHS. Additionally, any recipient of Medical Assistance benefits that fails to timely report to DHS or its designee any change that may affect eligibility is ineligible for benefits for six months from the date DHS discovers the failure to report the change. Under current law, knowingly concealing or failing to disclose any event that an individual knows affects the initial or continued right to a Medical Assistance benefit is subject to a forfeiture of not less than $100 nor more than $15,000 for each concealment or failure.

Read the full summary

The bill requires DHS to enter data sharing agreements with any agency that maintains a database of financial or personal information about residents of this state. DHS must confirm the information of an applicant for a public assistance program against the information contained in those databases. The bill also requires DHS to share data for this purpose of confirming eligibility for public assistance programs. Current law requires DHS and the Department of Children and Families to compare each department's respective databases against the databases of death records to identify deceased participants.

The bill requires DHS to promptly remove from eligibility for the Medical Assistance program any individual who has been determined to be ineligible for the program. Under the federal Families First Coronavirus Act, during a federally declared public health emergency, a state may receive an enhanced amount of federal financial participation in its Medical Assistance program if the state complies with certain criteria, including refraining from disenrolling individuals from the program. Under the bill, if the disenrollment or any other part of the bill would cause the state not to comply, that portion of the bill that does not comply may not be implemented until the period of enhanced federal financial participation ends.

During the period before it ends, DHS must audit Medical Assistance eligibility and report quarterly to the legislature the number of individuals who are ineligible for Medical Assistance but who are receiving benefits.

Who's behind it

27 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 27 are Republicans.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 33 names

Authors (27)

Signed on in support (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 5 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Public Benefit Reform vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Feb 15, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Public Benefit Reform, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Public Benefit Reform vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 2 · Feb 15, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Public Benefit Reform, Ayes 5, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 59 to 35 · Feb 17, 2022 · 3 didn't vote

See how each of the 97 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (59)

Didn't vote (3)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 18, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 20 to 13 · Feb 22, 2022

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 17, 2022

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Apr 15, 2022

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Apr 13, 2022

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 22, 2022

    The Senate passed it too, 20 to 13.

  5. Feb 18, 2022

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  6. Feb 18, 2022

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  7. Feb 17, 2022

    The Senate received it.

  8. Feb 17, 2022

    The Assembly passed it, 59 to 35.

  9. Feb 17, 2022

    The Assembly adopted it.

  10. Feb 15, 2022

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  11. Feb 15, 2022

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 2.

  12. Feb 8, 2022

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Feb 8, 2022

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Feb 3, 2022

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  15. Jan 31, 2022

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Public Benefit Reform.

  16. Jan 31, 2022

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 31, 2022 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Penterman, August, Vorpagel, Allen, Brandtjen, Cabral-Guevara, Callahan, Dittrich, Edming, James, Knodl, Kuglitsch, Loudenbeck, Macco, Magnafici, Moses, Petersen, Plumer, Schraa, Snyder, Sortwell, Steffen, Tittl, Tusler, Wichgers, Zimmerman and Born; cosponsored by Senators Stafsholt, Jacque, Bernier, Feyen and Nass

  2. Jan 31, 2022 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Public Benefit Reform

  3. Feb 3, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Murphy added as a coauthor

  4. Feb 8, 2022 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 8, 2022 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Feb 9, 2022 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Penterman

  7. Feb 10, 2022 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Feb 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Public Benefit Reform, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  9. Feb 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Public Benefit Reform, Ayes 5, Noes 2

  10. Feb 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Feb 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-17-2022 by Committee on Rules

  12. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  14. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  16. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 59, Noes 35, Paired 2

  17. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Feb 17, 2022 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  19. Feb 18, 2022 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  20. Feb 18, 2022 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  21. Feb 18, 2022 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  22. Feb 18, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-22-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  23. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Read a second time

  24. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  26. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 20, Noes 13

  27. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  29. Feb 28, 2022 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 2-28-2022

  30. Apr 13, 2022 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-13-2022

  31. Apr 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-15-2022

  32. May 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  33. May 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote