Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Assembly Bill 935

FoodShare work and FoodShare employment and training requirements and drug testing

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 15, 2022. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 31, 2022

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 58 to 34

  4. Senate vote, passed

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Apr 15, 2022.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2022: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

2015 Wisconsin Act 55 required the Department of Health Services to promulgate rules to develop and implement a drug screening, testing, and treatment policy, which DHS promulgated as Wis. Admin. Code ch. DHS 38.

2017 Wisconsin Act 370 incorporated ch. DHS 38 into statutes, relating to drug screening, testing, and treatment for recipients of the FoodShare employment and training program, known as FSET. Current law requires DHS to require all able-bodied adults, with some limited exceptions, who seek benefits from the FoodShare program to participate in FSET unless they are already employed. Current law also requires able-bodied adults without dependents to comply with certain work requirements, and, if they do not comply or meet a specified exception, their eligibility for FoodShare is limited to three months during a three-year period. DHS is currently waiving, due to the coronavirus pandemic, the time limits on benefits for failing to comply with the FoodShare work requirement, and the other requirements have not yet been implemented. This bill requires DHS to enforce the work requirement on able-bodied adults without dependents; the FSET requirement on able-bodied adults; and the drug screening, testing, and treatment requirements. If necessary to comply with this requirement, DHS must immediately withdraw any waiver or suspension of the time limits on eligibility for FoodShare for not fulfilling the work requirement.

Read the full summary

Current law prohibits DHS from submitting a request to a federal agency for a waiver or renewal, modification, withdrawal, suspension, or termination of a waiver of federal law or rules or for authorization to implement a pilot program or demonstration project unless legislation has been enacted specifically directing the submission of the request. If legislation allows DHS to submit such a request, current law specifies a procedure for that submission process that includes review by the Joint Committee on Finance. The bill prohibits DHS from waiving the requirements specified in the bill without either complying with the current law process or, if the process is inapplicable, submitting the waiver proposal to JCF for review under its passive review process.

Who's behind it

35 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 35 are Republicans.

8 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 43 names

Authors (35)

Signed on in support (8)

How lawmakers voted

There were 5 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Public Benefit Reform vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 2 · Feb 15, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Public Benefit Reform, Ayes 5, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 58 to 34 · Feb 17, 2022 · 3 didn't vote

See how each of the 95 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (58)

Didn't vote (3)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 18, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Failed, 12 to 21 · Feb 22, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Refused to refer to committee on Economic and Workforce Development, Ayes 12, Noes 21”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 21 to 12 · Feb 22, 2022

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 17, 2022

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Apr 15, 2022

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Apr 13, 2022

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 22, 2022

    The Senate passed it too, 21 to 12.

  5. Feb 22, 2022

    “Read a third time” (the official wording)

  6. Feb 18, 2022

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  7. Feb 18, 2022

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  8. Feb 17, 2022

    The Senate received it.

  9. Feb 17, 2022

    The Assembly passed it, 58 to 34.

  10. Feb 15, 2022

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  11. Feb 15, 2022

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 2.

  12. Feb 8, 2022

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Feb 3, 2022

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  14. Jan 31, 2022

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Public Benefit Reform.

  15. Jan 31, 2022

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 31, 2022 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Born, Armstrong, August, Brandtjen, Cabral-Guevara, Callahan, Dittrich, Duchow, Edming, James, Katsma, Kitchens, Knodl, Krug, Kuglitsch, Kurtz, Loudenbeck, Macco, Magnafici, Moses, Penterman, Petersen, Petryk, Plumer, Rozar, Schraa, Skowronski, Snyder, Sortwell, Steffen, Tittl, Tusler, Vorpagel, Wichgers and Zimmerman; cosponsored by Senators Testin, Bernier, Felzkowski, Feyen, Marklein, Nass and Stroebel

  2. Jan 31, 2022 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Public Benefit Reform

  3. Feb 3, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Murphy added as a coauthor

  4. Feb 8, 2022 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 10, 2022 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Public Benefit Reform, Ayes 5, Noes 2

  7. Feb 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Feb 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-17-2022 by Committee on Rules

  9. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  12. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 58, Noes 34, Paired 4

  13. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Feb 17, 2022 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  15. Feb 18, 2022 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  16. Feb 18, 2022 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  17. Feb 18, 2022 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  18. Feb 18, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-22-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  19. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Read a second time

  20. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  22. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Read a third time

  23. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Refused to refer to committee on Economic and Workforce Development, Ayes 12, Noes 21

  24. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Concurred in, Ayes 21, Noes 12

  25. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  27. Feb 28, 2022 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 2-28-2022

  28. Apr 13, 2022 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-13-2022

  29. Apr 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-15-2022

  30. May 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  31. May 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote