Skip to content

Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session

SB 197

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: legal custody and physical placement factors for a child of a service member.

Court — Procedure Family — Support Military personnel National guard

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, in determining the legal custody of a child, a court may not

consider whether a service member has been or may be called into active duty and

consequently is or may be absent from his or her home. Under current law, “service

member” is defined as a member of the national guard or a reserve unit of the U.S.

armed forces. Under this bill, “service member,” for the purposes of determining

legal custody and physical placement of a child adds a member of the U.S. armed

forces or forces incorporated in the U.S. armed forces to the definition.

This bill also prohibits a court from denying a parent who is a service member

periods of physical placement with his or her child based on past or future

anticipated variability in his or her schedule, living arrangements, or location due

to service in the military.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Jacque (R)

11 cosponsors

Armstrong (R) , Brandtjen (R) , Carpenter (D) , Edming (R) , James (R) , Knodl (R) , Krug (R) , Rozar (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Tusler (R) , Wichgers (R)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs and Constitution and Federalism, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Apr 28, 2021 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Mar 10, 2021 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Jacque; cosponsored by Representatives Thiesfeldt, Wichgers, Armstrong, Brandtjen, James, Knodl, Krug, Rozar and Tusler

  2. Mar 10, 2021 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs and Constitution and Federalism

  3. Apr 21, 2021 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Apr 28, 2021 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  5. Apr 28, 2021 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs and Constitution and Federalism, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  6. Apr 28, 2021 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  7. May 7, 2021 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-11-2021 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  8. May 11, 2021 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  9. May 11, 2021 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  10. May 11, 2021 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  11. May 11, 2021 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  12. May 11, 2021 · Senate

    Senator Carpenter added as a coauthor

  13. May 11, 2021 · Senate

    Read a second time

  14. May 11, 2021 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Dec 6, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Family Law

  16. Jan 6, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Edming added as a cosponsor

  17. Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1