Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Senate Bill 212

Defects on absentee ballot certificates, certain kinds of election fraud, and providing a penalty. (FE)

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Aug 10, 2021. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 16, 2021

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed May 11, 2021

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 60 to 38

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Aug 10, 2021.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2022: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Election fraud Current law prohibits election officials from committing certain kinds of election fraud, including permitting a person to register to vote or vote when the election official knows the person is not qualified to do so. This bill provides further that no election official may do any of the following:

1. Intentionally assist or cause the casting or counting of a vote or the receipt of a registration that the election official knows is invalid.

Read the full summary

2. Intentionally assist or cause a vote or registration to be rejected when the election official knows the vote or registration is valid.

3. Intentionally fail to promptly report election fraud committed by another election official.

Under current law, an election official who commits election fraud is generally subject to a fine not to exceed $10,000 or imprisonment not to exceed three years and six months or both. Under the bill, election officials violating the prohibitions described above are likewise subject to that penalty.

Absentee ballot certificates Under current law, absentee ballot envelopes include a printed certificate that must be completed, signed by the voter and a qualified witness, and returned to the municipal clerk with the completed ballot so that it is delivered to the polling place no later than 8 p.m. on election day. By completing and signing the certificate, the voter certifies that he or she is entitled to vote in the election and that the voter completed his or her absentee ballot in the presence of the witness. The witness certificate includes the witness's printed name and address in addition to his or her signature. If a municipal clerk receives an absentee ballot with an improperly completed certificate or with no certificate, the clerk may, but is not required to, return the ballot to the voter whenever time permits so that the voter may correct the defect.

Under this bill, if a municipal clerk receives an absentee ballot with an improperly completed certificate or with no certificate, the clerk is required to return the ballot to the voter and post a notification of the defect on the voter's voter information page on the Internet site that is used by voters for original registration, currently titled MyVote Wisconsin. The bill also prohibits the municipal clerk from correcting a defect in the certificate.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report.

Who's behind it

11 senators are its ⁠. All 11 are Republicans.

11 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 22 names

Authors (11)

Signed on in support (11)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Elections vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · May 7, 2021

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 20 to 13 · May 11, 2021

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 60 to 38 · Jun 22, 2021

See how each of the 98 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (60)

No (38)

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 17, 2022

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Aug 10, 2021

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Aug 5, 2021

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Jun 22, 2021

    The Assembly passed it too, 60 to 38.

  5. Jun 15, 2021

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. May 11, 2021

    The Assembly received it.

  7. May 11, 2021

    The Senate passed it, 20 to 13.

  8. May 11, 2021

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. May 7, 2021

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  10. May 5, 2021

    The committee held a public hearing.

  11. Apr 8, 2021

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Mar 16, 2021

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics.

  13. Mar 16, 2021

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 16, 2021 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Darling, Stroebel, Wimberger, Ballweg, Bradley, Felzkowski, Feyen, Jacque, Marklein, Nass and Wanggaard; cosponsored by Representatives Sanfelippo, Edming, Gundrum, Knodl, Krug, Murphy, Neylon, Skowronski, Steffen, VanderMeer and Wichgers

  2. Mar 16, 2021 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics

  3. Apr 8, 2021 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. May 5, 2021 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. May 7, 2021 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. May 7, 2021 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  7. May 7, 2021 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. May 7, 2021 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Darling

  9. May 7, 2021 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-11-2021 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  10. May 11, 2021 · Senate

    Read a second time

  11. May 11, 2021 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  12. May 11, 2021 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. May 11, 2021 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  14. May 11, 2021 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 20, Noes 13

  15. May 11, 2021 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. May 11, 2021 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  17. Jun 15, 2021 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  18. Jun 16, 2021 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 6-22-2021 by Committee on Rules

  19. Jun 22, 2021 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  20. Jun 22, 2021 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  21. Jun 22, 2021 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Jun 22, 2021 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  23. Jun 22, 2021 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 60, Noes 38

  24. Jun 22, 2021 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Jun 22, 2021 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  26. Jun 28, 2021 · Senate

    LRB correction (Senate Amendment 1)

  27. Jun 28, 2021 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  28. Aug 5, 2021 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 8-5-2021

  29. Aug 10, 2021 · Senate

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 8-10-2021

  30. May 17, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  31. May 17, 2022 · Senate

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote