Senate Bill 3
Pharmacy benefit managers, prescription drug benefits, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Mar 29, 2021. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jan 15, 2021
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Feb 16, 2021
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 94 to 0
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2021 Wisconsin Act 9
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 29, 2021: “Published 3-27-2021”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill generally requires pharmacy benefit managers to be licensed with the commissioner of insurance or to have an employee benefit plan administrator license under current law. The bill also establishes certain requirements on pharmacy benefit managers and certain health plans regarding their interactions with pharmacies and pharmacists. Under the bill, a pharmacy benefit manager is an entity that contracts to administer or manage prescription drug benefits on behalf of an insurer, a cooperative, or another entity that provides prescription drug benefits to Wisconsin residents.
Licensure of pharmacy benefit managers The bill requires a pharmacy benefit manager to be licensed either as a pharmacy benefit manager or as an employee benefit plan administrator, which is an existing license under current law, in order to perform the activities of a pharmacy benefit manager. The bill specifies that an entity that is both an employee benefit plan administrator and a pharmacy benefit manager need only have a single license as an administrator. To obtain a license, the pharmacy benefit manager must pay the applicable fee; supply a bond; provide its federal employer identification number;
Read the full summary Show less
and show to the commissioner that the pharmacy benefit manager intends to act in good faith in compliance with applicable laws, rules, and commissioner's orders through certain competent and trustworthy individuals, to designate an individual to directly administer the prescription drug benefits, and, if not organized in Wisconsin, to agree to be subject to the jurisdiction of the commissioner and Wisconsin courts. Under the bill, pharmacy benefit manager licenses may be limited, suspended, or revoked for the same reasons as for employee benefit plan administrator licenses, which include that the pharmacy benefit manager is unqualified; repeatedly or knowingly violates laws, rules, or commissioner's orders;
endangers enrollees or the public; or has inadequate financial resources. After a pharmacy benefit manager's license is ordered suspended or revoked, the commissioner may allow the pharmacy benefit manager to continue to provide services for the purpose of providing continuity of care to existing enrollees. In addition to powers the commissioner has generally to implement and enforce insurance-related laws, the bill allows the commissioner to examine, audit, or accept an audit of a pharmacy benefit manager in the same manner as employee benefit plan administrators and insurers and to promulgate any rules to implement licensure of pharmacy benefit managers.
Pharmacy benefit manager regulation Unless federal law requires otherwise, a pharmacy benefit manager is prohibited in the bill from retroactively denying a pharmacist's or pharmacy's claim unless the original claim was fraudulent, the payment of the original claim was incorrect, the pharmacy services were not rendered by the pharmacist or pharmacy, the pharmacist or pharmacy violated state or federal law, or the reduction is permitted by contract and is related to a quality program. The bill limits recovery for an incorrect payment to the amount that exceeds the allowable claim. The bill requires every pharmacy benefit manager to submit annual transparency reports containing information specified in the bill to the commissioner. The bill sets requirements on a pharmacy benefit manager; insurer; defined network plan, such as a health maintenance organization; or a self-insured governmental health plan that is conducting an audit of a pharmacist or pharmacy.
Certain health plans, or pharmacy benefit managers on behalf of health plans, may require a pharmacy to fulfill certification or accreditation requirements in order to participate in the plan's network of providers. The bill requires a pharmacy benefit manager or a representative of a pharmacy benefit manager to provide to a pharmacy, within 30 days of receipt of a written request from the pharmacy, written notice of the certification or accreditation requirements as a determinant of network participation. The bill prohibits a pharmacy benefit manager or representative from changing its accreditation requirements more frequently than once every 12 months.
Current law requires pharmacy benefit managers to agree in their contracts to make certain disclosures regarding prescription drug reimbursement, including updating maximum allowable cost pricing information for prescribed drugs or devices at least every seven business days, reimbursing pharmacies or pharmacists subject to the updated maximum allowable cost pricing, and modifying information in the maximum allowable cost information in a timely fashion. Pharmacy benefit managers currently must also include in each contract with a pharmacy a process to appeal, investigate, and resolve pricing disputes in accordance with the specifics in current law. These current law requirements are unchanged by the bill.
Disclosures to consumers; cost-sharing limitation Under the bill, a health insurance policy or a governmental self-insured health plan may not, and a policy or plan must ensure that a pharmacy benefit manager does not, restrict a pharmacy from or penalize a pharmacy for informing an enrollee under the policy or plan of any differential between the out-of-pocket cost of a drug to the enrollee under the policy or plan and the cost an individual would pay for the drug without using insurance. Health insurance policies are referred to in the bill as disability insurance policies. The bill prohibits a policy, plan, or pharmacy benefit manager from requiring an enrollee under the policy or plan to pay more for a covered drug than either the cost-sharing amount for the prescription drug under the policy or plan or the amount the enrollee would pay for the drug without using insurance, whichever amount is lower.
The bill requires pharmacies to post a sign describing the pharmacist's ability to substitute a less expensive drug product equivalent or interchangeable biological product for the prescribed drug or biological product unless the consumer or the prescribing practitioner indicates otherwise. Under current law, a pharmacist is required to dispense either the prescribed drug or biological product or, if lower in price, a drug product equivalent or interchangeable biological product. The pharmacist is currently required to inform the consumer of the options available in dispensing the prescription. The bill requires each pharmacy to have available for the public a listing of the retail price, updated monthly or more often, of the 100 most commonly prescribed prescription drugs available for purchase at the pharmacy.
The bill also requires pharmacies to make available for the public information on how to access a list, created by the Pharmacy Examining Board, of the 100 most commonly prescribed generic drugs with the corresponding brand name, and the federal Food and Drug Administration's list of currently approved interchangeable biological products, which the Pharmacy Examining Board currently has to provide a link to on its Internet site.
Drug substitution The bill requires a health insurance policy, governmental self-insured health plan, or pharmacy benefit manager to provide advanced written notice to an enrollee of a formulary change that either removes a prescription drug from the formulary or reassigns a prescription drug to a higher benefit tier. A higher benefit tier is a tier with a higher deductible, copayment, or coinsurance than the tier the prescription drug had been assigned. The advanced notice required by the bill must be provided no fewer than 30 days before the expected formulary change, must include information on the procedure for the enrollee to request an exception to the formulary change, and need only be provided to those enrollees who are using the drug at the time the notification must be sent. A policy, plan, or pharmacy benefit manager is not required to provide advanced written notice if the prescription drug is no longer approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration; is the subject of a notice, guidance, warning, announcement, or other statement from the FDA relating to concerns about the safety of the drug; or is approved by the FDA for use without a prescription. A policy, plan, or pharmacy benefit manager is also not required to provide advanced written notice for the removal or reassignment of a prescription drug if the policy, plan, or pharmacy benefit manager adds to the formulary at the same or a lower benefit tier a generic prescription drug that is approved by the FDA for use as an alternative to the prescription drug or a prescription drug in the same pharmacologic class or with the same mechanism of action. A lower benefit tier has a lower deductible, copayment, or coinsurance than the prescription drug's current benefit tier.
The bill requires a pharmacist or pharmacy to notify an enrollee in a policy or plan if a prescription drug for which an enrollee is filling or refilling a prescription is removed from the formulary and the policy or plan or a pharmacy benefit manager acting on behalf of a policy or plan adds to the formulary at the same or a lower cost-sharing tier a generic prescription drug or a prescription drug in the same pharmacologic class or with the same mechanism of action. If an enrollee has had an adverse reaction to the prescription drug that is being substituted for an originally prescribed drug, the bill allows the pharmacist or pharmacy to extend the prescription order for the originally prescribed drug to fill one 30-day supply of the originally prescribed drug for the cost-sharing amount that applies to the prescription drug at the time of the substitution.
This proposal may contain a health insurance mandate requiring a social and financial impact report under s. 601.423, stats.
Who's behind it
17 senators are its . 11 are Republicans and 6 are Democrats.
43 more lawmakers .
See all 60 names Hide the names
Authors (17)
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Kathleen Bernier · Republican, Senate
- Rob Cowles · Republican, Senate
- Alberta Darling · Republican, Senate
- Jon Erpenbach · Democrat, Senate
- Mary Felzkowski · Republican, Senate
- Dan Feyen · Republican, Senate
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Chris Larson · Democrat, Senate
- Howard Marklein · Republican, Senate
- Steve Nass · Republican, Senate
- Janis Ringhand · Democrat, Senate
- Roger Roth · Republican, Senate
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
- Van Wanggaard · Republican, Senate
- Bob Wirch · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (43)
- Dave Armstrong · Republican, Assembly
- Janet Bewley · Democrat, Senate
- Rob Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara · Republican, Senate
- Calvin Callahan · Republican, Assembly
- Tim Carpenter · Democrat, Senate
- Alex Dallman · Republican, Assembly
- Barbara Dittrich · Republican, Assembly
- Doyle, Conley, Emerson, B. Meyers, Considine, Subeck, Allen and Stubbs
- Cindi Duchow · Republican, Assembly
- James Edming · Republican, Assembly
- Rick Gundrum · Republican, Assembly
- Dianne Hesselbein · Democrat, Senate
- Cody Horlacher · Republican, Assembly
- Jessie Rodriguez · Republican, Assembly
- Jesse James · Republican, Senate
- LaTonya Johnson · Democrat, Senate
- Joel Kitchens · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Krug · Republican, Assembly
- Mike Kuglitsch · Republican, Assembly
- Amy Loudenbeck · Republican, Assembly
- Gae Magnafici · Republican, Assembly
- Clint Moses · Republican, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- Todd Novak · Republican, Assembly
- Kevin Petersen · Republican, Assembly
- Jon Plumer · Republican, Assembly
- Timothy Ramthun · Republican, Assembly
- Donna Rozar · Republican, Assembly
- Michael Schraa · Republican, Assembly
- Shankland, Pope, Spreitzer, Hintz, Sinicki, Goyke, Billings, Hebl, Andraca, Ohnstad, Brostoff, S. Rodriguez, Vining and Baldeh
- Ken Skowronski · Republican, Assembly
- Pat Snyder · Republican, Assembly
- Shae Sortwell · Republican, Assembly
- John Spiros · Republican, Assembly
- Rob Swearingen · Republican, Assembly
- Gary Tauchen · Republican, Assembly
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt · Republican, Assembly
- Paul Tittl · Republican, Assembly
- Travis Tranel · Republican, Assembly
- Tyler Vorpagel · Republican, Assembly
- Chuck Wichgers · Republican, Assembly
- Shannon Zimmerman · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 6 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Health vote on an amendment
Passed, 4 to 1 · Feb 11, 2021
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Health vote to recommend it
Passed, 4 to 1 · Feb 11, 2021
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 12, 2021
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 12, 2021
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 31 to 1 · Feb 16, 2021
See how each of the 32 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (31)
- Alberta Darling (R, 8)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Brad Pfaff (D, 32)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dan Feyen (R, 20)
- Devin LeMahieu (R, 9)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Eric Wimberger (R, 2)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Janet Bewley (D, 25)
- Janis Ringhand (D, 15)
- Jeff Smith (D, 31)
- Jerry Petrowski (R, 29)
- Joan Ballweg (R, 14)
- Jon Erpenbach (D, 27)
- Julian Bradley (R, 28)
- Kathleen Bernier (R, 23)
- Kelda Roys (D, 26)
- LaTonya Johnson (D, 6)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Mary Felzkowski (R, 12)
- Melissa Agard (D, 16)
- Patrick Testin (R, 24)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Rob Stafsholt (R, 10)
- Roger Roth (R, 19)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
No (1)
- Dale Kooyenga (R, 5)
Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 94 to 0 · Mar 16, 2021 · 4 didn't vote
See how each of the 98 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (94)
- Adam Neylon (R, 15)
- Alex Dallman (R, 39)
- Amy Loudenbeck (R, 31)
- Barbara Dittrich (R, 99)
- Beth Meyers (D, 74)
- Bob Wittke (R, 63)
- Calvin Callahan (R, 35)
- Christine Sinicki (D, 20)
- Chuck Wichgers (R, 84)
- Cindi Duchow (R, 97)
- Clint Moses (R, 92)
- Cody Horlacher (R, 33)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Daniel Riemer (D, 7)
- Dave Armstrong (R, 67)
- Dave Considine (D, 81)
- Dave Murphy (R, 56)
- David Bowen (D, 10)
- David Steffen (R, 4)
- Deb Andraca (D, 23)
- Dianne Hesselbein (D, 27)
- Don Vruwink (D, 43)
- Donna Rozar (R, 69)
- Dora Drake (D, 4)
- Evan Goyke (D, 18)
- Francesca Hong (D, 76)
- Gae Magnafici (R, 28)
- Gary Hebl (D, 46)
- Gary Tauchen (R, 6)
- Gordon Hintz (D, 54)
- Greta Neubauer (D, 66)
- James Edming (R, 87)
- Janel Brandtjen (R, 22)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt (R, 52)
- Jesse James (R, 23)
- Jessie Rodriguez (R, 21)
- Jill Billings (D, 95)
- Jim Steineke (R, 5)
- Jimmy Anderson (D, 47)
- Jodi Emerson (D, 91)
- Joe Sanfelippo (R, 15)
- Joel Kitchens (R, 1)
- John Jagler (R, 13)
- John Spiros (R, 86)
- Jon Plumer (R, 42)
- Jonathan Brostoff (D, 19)
- Kalan Haywood (D, 16)
- Ken Skowronski (R, 82)
- Kevin Petersen (R, 57)
- Kristina Shelton (D, 90)
- LaKeshia Myers (D, 12)
- Lee Snodgrass (D, 52)
- Lisa Subeck (D, 79)
- Loren Oldenburg (R, 96)
- Marisabel Cabrera (D, 9)
- Mark Born (R, 37)
- Mark Spreitzer (D, 15)
- Michael Schraa (R, 53)
- Mike Kuglitsch (R, 84)
- Nancy VanderMeer (R, 70)
- Nick Milroy (D, 73)
- Pat Snyder (R, 85)
- Paul Tittl (R, 25)
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara (R, 19)
- Rick Gundrum (R, 58)
- Rob Brooks (R, 59)
- Rob Summerfield (R, 68)
- Rob Swearingen (R, 34)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Robyn Vining (D, 13)
- Ron Tusler (R, 3)
- Samantha Kerkman (R, 61)
- Samba Baldeh (D, 48)
- Sara Rodriguez (D, 13)
- Scott Allen (R, 82)
- Shae Sortwell (R, 2)
- Shannon Zimmerman (R, 30)
- Shelia Stubbs (D, 78)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
- Sue Conley (D, 44)
- Supreme Moore Omokunde (D, 17)
- Sylvia Ortiz-Velez (D, 8)
- Terry Katsma (R, 26)
- Timothy Ramthun (R, 59)
- Tip McGuire (D, 64)
- Tod Ohnstad (D, 65)
- Todd Novak (R, 51)
- Tony Kurtz (R, 41)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
- Treig Pronschinske (R, 29)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
- Tyler Vorpagel (R, 27)
- Warren Petryk (R, 93)
Didn't vote (4)
- John Macco (R, 88)
- Katrina Shankland (D, 71)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Sondy Pope (D, 80)
Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 29, 2021
The new law was published.
-
Mar 29, 2021
The governor signed it. It became 2021 Wisconsin Act 9.
-
Mar 19, 2021
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 16, 2021
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Mar 16, 2021
The Assembly passed it too, 94 to 0.
-
Mar 12, 2021 to Mar 15, 2021
22 more representatives signed on in support.
-
Mar 11, 2021
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 16, 2021
The Assembly received it.
-
Feb 16, 2021
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Feb 16, 2021
The Senate passed it, 31 to 1.
-
Feb 16, 2021
The Senate adopted it.
-
Feb 12, 2021
“Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Feb 12, 2021
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Feb 11, 2021
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 11, 2021
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.
-
Feb 11, 2021
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 4, Noes 1” (the official wording)
-
Feb 9, 2021
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Feb 9, 2021
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 5, 2021
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 4, 2021
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Jan 28, 2021
“Commissioner of Insurance report received pursuant to s.601.423(2), Wisconsin Statutes” (the official wording)
-
Jan 26, 2021
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 22, 2021
1 more representative and 1 senator signed on in support.
-
Jan 15, 2021
Sent to the Senate Committee on Health.
-
Jan 15, 2021
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jan 15, 2021 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Felzkowski, Roth, Erpenbach, Bernier, Cowles, Darling, Feyen, Marklein, Ringhand, Smith, Wanggaard, Wirch, Ballweg, Jacque, Larson, Nass and L. Taylor; cosponsored by Representatives Schraa, Dittrich, Duchow, Horlacher, Krug, Ramthun, Novak, J. Rodriguez, Spiros, Tauchen, Tittl, Armstrong, Brooks, Cabral-Guevara, Callahan, Edming, Gundrum, James, Kitchens, Kuglitsch, Loudenbeck, Magnafici, Moses, Mursau, Petersen, Plumer, Rozar, Skowronski, Snyder, Sortwell, Swearingen, Thiesfeldt, Tranel, Vorpagel and Zimmerman
- Jan 15, 2021 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Health
- Jan 22, 2021 · Senate
Senator Johnson added as a coauthor
- Jan 22, 2021 · Senate
Representative Wichgers added as a cosponsor
- Jan 26, 2021 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 28, 2021 · Senate
Commissioner of Insurance report received pursuant to s.601.423(2), Wisconsin Statutes
- Feb 4, 2021 · Senate
Senator Bewley added as a coauthor
- Feb 5, 2021 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 9, 2021 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 9, 2021 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Felzkowski
- Feb 9, 2021 · Senate
Representative Dallman added as a cosponsor
- Feb 10, 2021 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Felzkowski
- Feb 11, 2021 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 11, 2021 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 4, Noes 1
- Feb 11, 2021 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 4, Noes 1
- Feb 11, 2021 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 11, 2021 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 12, 2021 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 12, 2021 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 12, 2021 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-16-2021 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 16, 2021 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 16, 2021 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 adopted
- Feb 16, 2021 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 16, 2021 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 16, 2021 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 31, Noes 1
- Feb 16, 2021 · Senate
Senator Carpenter added as a coauthor
- Feb 16, 2021 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 16, 2021 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Mar 11, 2021 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 11, 2021 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 3-16-2021 by Committee on Rules
- Mar 12, 2021 · Assembly
Representatives Shankland, Pope, Spreitzer, Hintz, Sinicki, Goyke, Billings, Hebl, Andraca, Ohnstad, Brostoff, S. Rodriguez, Vining and Baldeh added as cosponsors
- Mar 15, 2021 · Assembly
Representatives Doyle, Conley, Emerson, B. Meyers, Considine, Subeck, Allen and Stubbs added as cosponsors
- Mar 16, 2021 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
- Mar 16, 2021 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 16, 2021 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 16, 2021 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 16, 2021 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 94, Noes 0
- Mar 16, 2021 · Assembly
Representative Hesselbein added as a cosponsor
- Mar 16, 2021 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 16, 2021 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 18, 2021 · Senate
LRB correction
- Mar 18, 2021 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Mar 19, 2021 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 3-19-2021
- Mar 29, 2021 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 3-26-2021. 2021 Wisconsin Act 9
- Mar 29, 2021 · Senate
Published 3-27-2021
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote