Senate Bill 361
Regulating and addressing PFAS, providing an exemption from rule-making procedures, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation. (FE)
Stopped in committee
It never got a , so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
May 25, 2021
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. No public hearing was held.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 15, 2022: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill makes various changes to existing programs, creates new programs and standards, provides funding, and creates new positions to address perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
Groundwater standards for PFAS Under current law, the Department of Natural Resources maintains a list of substances that have a reasonable probability of entering the groundwater resources of the state and that are shown to involve public health concerns. The Department of Health Services recommends groundwater enforcement standards for substances on this list, which DNR then proposes as DNR rules in its rule-making process.
Read the full summary Show less
The bill requires DNR to apply DHS's recommended groundwater enforcement standard for any PFAS as an interim groundwater enforcement standard for all facilities, practices, and activities that may affect groundwater and that are regulated by certain state agencies, unless emergency or permanent rules that establish an enforcement standard for those substances are in effect.
Drinking water standards for PFAS The bill also requires DNR to apply DHS's recommended enforcement standard for any PFAS as an interim maximum contaminant level for public water systems and water suppliers. DNR must also require public water systems and water suppliers to monitor for such PFAS in accordance with requirements under current DNR rules. The bill also requires public water systems and water suppliers to use certain specified treatment technologies as an interim best available technology to treat PFAS for which DHS has recommended an enforcement standard. Public water systems and water suppliers must also use laboratories certified to analyze drinking water to conduct required testing, and must use the method detection limit for reporting purposes.
Water quality criteria for PFAS Under the federal Clean Water Act and under current state law, DNR is required to set water quality standards for the waters of the state. Water quality standards consist of designated uses for each of the waters of the state, water quality criteria for those waters based on their designated use, and antidegradation provisions that prohibit the degradation of existing uses. This bill requires DNR to promulgate water quality criteria for any PFAS for which DHS has recommended a groundwater enforcement standard.
Soil and sediment residual contamination levels for PFAS Under current law, when a responsible party conducts a cleanup action to address soil contamination, the cleanup must be designed and implemented to restore the contaminated soil to certain designated residual contaminant levels or performance standards. Under this bill, DNR must require responsible parties to establish residual contaminant levels for the cleanup of contaminated soil and sediment as a result of a discharge of any PFAS for which DHS has recommended a groundwater enforcement standard.
Air emission standards and reporting requirements for PFAS Under the bill, DNR must also establish air emission standards for any PFAS for which DHS has recommended a groundwater enforcement standard, to provide adequate protection for public health and welfare, taking into account energy, economic, and environmental impacts and other costs related to the emission source.
The bill also requires DNR to consider any PFAS for which DHS has recommended a groundwater enforcement standard to be an air contaminant and to require reporting of any emission of those PFAS.
Rule-making exemptions for PFAS Current law requires an agency to suspend working on a permanent rule if it determines that the proposed rule may result in more than $10,000,000 in implementation and compliance costs over any two-year period. The bill creates an exemption from this requirement for any proposed DNR rule that establishes acceptable levels and standards, performance standards, monitoring requirements, or required response actions for any PFAS compound or group or class of PFAS in groundwater, drinking water, surface water, air, soil, or sediment.
PFAS municipal grant program The bill creates a municipal grant program, administered by DNR, to address PFAS. Under the program, DNR must provide grants to cities, towns, villages, counties, utility districts, lake protection districts, sewerage districts, and municipal airports. DNR may award a grant only if the applicant tested or trained with a PFAS-containing fire fighting foam in accordance with applicable state and federal law, or if a third party tested or trained with PFAS-containing fire fighting foam within the boundaries of the municipality; the applicant applied biosolids to land under a water pollution permit issued by DNR; or PFAS are impacting the applicant's drinking water supply or surface water or groundwater within the municipality and the responsible party is unknown or is unwilling or unable to take the necessary response actions.
Under the bill, grants provided under this program may be used to investigate potential PFAS impacts in order to reduce or eliminate environmental contamination; treat or dispose of PFAS-containing fire fighting foam containers;
sample a private water supply within three miles of a site or facility known to contain PFAS or to have caused a PFAS discharge; provide a temporary emergency water supply, a water treatment system, or bulk water to replace water contaminated with PFAS; conduct emergency, interim, or remedial actions to mitigate, treat, dispose of, or remove PFAS contamination; remove or treat PFAS in public water systems in areas where PFAS levels exceed the maximum contaminant level for PFAS in drinking water or an enforcement standard for PFAS in groundwater or in areas where the state has issued a health advisory for PFAS; or pay the costs of a mediator to negotiate between municipalities for an alternate source of clean drinking water.
An applicant that receives a grant under this program must contribute matching funds equal to at least 20 percent of the amount of the grant. The applicant must apply for a grant on a form prescribed by DNR and must include any information that DNR finds is necessary to determine the eligibility of the project, identify the funding requested, determine the priority of the project, and calculate the amount of a grant. In awarding grants under this program, DNR must consider the applicant's demonstrated commitment to performing and completing eligible activities, including the applicant's financial commitment and ability to successfully administer grants; the degree to which the project will have a positive impact on public health and the environment; and any other criteria that DNR finds necessary to prioritize the funds available for awarding grants.
County PFAS well testing grant program The bill also creates a grant program, under which DNR provides grants to counties to provide sampling and testing services to private well owners to sample and test for PFAS, nitrates, bacteria, and lead. The bill provides $2,000,000 per fiscal year and creates one additional position at DNR for this purpose.
PFAS under the Safe Drinking Water Loan Program Under current law, the Department of Administration and DNR administer the Safe Drinking Water Loan Program (SDWLP), which provides financial assistance from the environmental improvement program to municipalities, and to the private owners of community water systems that serve municipalities, for projects that will help the municipality comply with federal drinking water standards. DNR establishes a funding priority list for SDWLP projects, and DOA allocates funding for those projects.
The bill requires DNR, when ranking the priority of SDWLP projects, to rank a project relating to PFAS in the same manner as if a maximum contaminant level for PFAS had been attained or exceeded, if DHS has recommended an enforcement standard for the type of PFAS involved in the project.
Mediator for municipalities seeking alternate water sources due to PFAS The bill creates an option for DNR to appoint a neutral, third-party mediator to help negotiate between municipalities and responsible parties when one municipality needs to obtain an alternate water source or connect to a water source within a different municipality as a result of PFAS contamination.
Under the bill, the mediator may assist the parties in coming to an agreement or, if no agreement is reached, recommend a solution. The parties to the mediation are responsible for the costs of mediation, as determined by the mediator. The mediator may add additional parties to the negotiation if necessary, and DNR must provide the mediator with technical assistance.
PFAS fire fighting foam regulation The bill includes several provisions that were included in DNR emergency rule 2045 and partially suspended by the Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules. Specifically, the bill:
1. Defines the term “foam” to include any material that contains PFAS that is generated as a result of foam storage, containment, or treatment, including treatment media, equipment used to clean up fire fighting foams, booms, filters, infrastructure, or other debris.
2. Defines the term “treatment” in a way that requires the immobilization, removal, or destruction of the contaminant.
3. Requires a person responsible for treatment of foam who uses a treatment other than incineration or thermal destruction to monitor and sample any treated wastewater for certain specific indicator parameters; requires treated wastewater samples to be collected at least weekly during periods of discharge; and specifies response actions that must be taken if the concentration of PFAS in a wastewater sample exceeds a specified treatment indicator parameter action level.
4. Requires the notification to DNR that is required under current law to be done according to ch. NR 706, Wis. Adm. Code.
PFAS in food packaging The bill also prohibits, beginning January 1, 2025, the distribution, sale, or offering for sale of any food packaging that contains intentionally added PFAS. A violation of this requirement would be subject to the same penalty for general environmental violations under current law, which is a civil forfeiture of between $10 and $5,000 for each violation.
Access to information on solid or hazardous waste In addition, the bill requires a person who generates solid or hazardous waste at a site or facility under investigation by DNR to provide DNR with access to information relating to any transportation to or treatment, storage, or disposal at another site, facility, or location.
Proof of financial responsibility for PFAS contamination The bill also provides that DNR may, if it determines doing so is necessary to protect human health or the environment, require a person who possesses or controls or who causes the discharge of PFAS to provide proof of financial responsibility for remediation and long-term care to address contamination by a potential discharge of PFAS or environmental pollution that may be caused by a discharge of PFAS. This financial responsibility requirement does not apply to a municipality, fire department, fire district, water utility, wastewater utility, agricultural producer, or the state.
Statewide PFAS biomonitoring studies The bill requires DHS to conduct biomonitoring studies across the state to assess PFAS exposure levels and better understand the factors that affect PFAS levels in residents of different communities. As part of these studies, DHS must survey participants, test blood samples for PFAS, and analyze the results. The bill authorizes 5.0 additional FTE positions in DHS to conduct these studies and provides $630,000 in annual funding for this purpose.
Longitudinal PFAS and human health study The bill also requires the Division of Extension at the University of Wisconsin-Madison to undertake a longitudinal human health study to assess the possible human health effects of PFAS. As part of this study, the Division of Extension must conduct an extensive, long-term health survey of participants, test blood and urine samples for PFAS and for markers of health effects, and analyze the results. The bill provides $1,000,000 in annual funding for this purpose. The bill also requires the Division of Extension to make any data generated from the study available to DHS.
Criteria for certifying labs for PFAS testing Down Down /2021/related/proposals/sb361 true proposaltext /2021/related/proposals/sb361 proposaltext/2021/REG/SB361 proposaltext/2021/REG/SB361 section true Menu » 2021 » Related Documents » Proposal Text » SB361: Bill Text × Details for PDF view Link (Permanent link) Bookmark this location View toggle Go to top of document Search in this chapter Search in this section Search in this agency Search in this chapter group Search in this chapter Search in this section Cross references for section Acts affecting this section References to this 1970 Statutes Annotations Appellate Court Citations Administrative Code Index Reference lines Clear highlighting $(document).ready(function () {
$('[data-toggle=tooltip]').tooltip({ container: 'body' });
});
Who's behind it
12 senators are its . All 12 are Democrats.
35 more lawmakers .
See all 47 names Hide the names
Authors (12)
- Melissa Agard · Democrat, Senate
- Janet Bewley · Democrat, Senate
- Tim Carpenter · Democrat, Senate
- Jon Erpenbach · Democrat, Senate
- LaTonya Johnson · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Chris Larson · Democrat, Senate
- Brad Pfaff · Democrat, Senate
- Janis Ringhand · Democrat, Senate
- Kelda Roys · Democrat, Senate
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
- Bob Wirch · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (35)
- Jimmy Anderson · Democrat, Assembly
- Deb Andraca · Democrat, Assembly
- Beth Meyers · Democrat, Assembly
- Samba Baldeh · Democrat, Assembly
- Jill Billings · Democrat, Assembly
- David Bowen · Democrat, Assembly
- Jonathan Brostoff · Democrat, Assembly
- Marisabel Cabrera · Democrat, Assembly
- Sue Conley · Democrat, Assembly
- Dave Considine · Democrat, Assembly
- Steve Doyle · Democrat, Assembly
- Dora Drake · Democrat, Senate
- Jodi Emerson · Democrat, Assembly
- Evan Goyke · Democrat, Assembly
- Gary Hebl · Democrat, Assembly
- Dianne Hesselbein · Democrat, Senate
- Gordon Hintz · Democrat, Assembly
- Francesca Hong · Democrat, Assembly
- Nick Milroy · Democrat, Assembly
- Supreme Moore Omokunde · Democrat, Assembly
- Greta Neubauer · Democrat, Assembly
- Tod Ohnstad · Democrat, Assembly
- Sylvia Ortiz-Velez · Democrat, Assembly
- Sondy Pope · Democrat, Assembly
- Daniel Riemer · Democrat, Assembly
- Sara Rodriguez · Democrat, Assembly
- Katrina Shankland · Democrat, Assembly
- Kristina Shelton · Democrat, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Lee Snodgrass · Democrat, Assembly
- Mark Spreitzer · Democrat, Senate
- Shelia Stubbs · Democrat, Assembly
- Lisa Subeck · Democrat, Assembly
- Robyn Vining · Democrat, Assembly
- Don Vruwink · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Senate vote
Failed, 11 to 19 · Mar 8, 2022
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Refused to withdraw from the committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform, Ayes 11, Noes 19”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 15, 2022
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Sep 8, 2021
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Jul 28, 2021
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jul 26, 2021
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jun 10, 2021
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jun 8, 2021
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
May 25, 2021
Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform.
-
May 25, 2021
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- May 25, 2021 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Agard, Pfaff, Smith, Roys, Larson, Carpenter, Erpenbach, Wirch, L. Taylor, Johnson, Ringhand and Bewley; cosponsored by Representatives Baldeh, Hebl, Shankland, Shelton, Billings, Sinicki, Neubauer, Hong, Snodgrass, Andraca, Conley, Considine, Subeck, Brostoff, Pope, S. Rodriguez, Cabrera, Anderson, Emerson, Doyle, Hesselbein, Drake, Vining, Vruwink, Bowen, Stubbs, Ohnstad, Spreitzer, B. Meyers, Ortiz-Velez, Riemer, Milroy and Moore Omokunde
- May 25, 2021 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform
- Jun 8, 2021 · Senate
Representative Hintz added as a cosponsor
- Jun 10, 2021 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 26, 2021 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 28, 2021 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 8, 2021 · Senate
Representative Goyke added as a cosponsor
- Mar 8, 2022 · Senate
Refused to withdraw from the committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform, Ayes 11, Noes 19
- Mar 15, 2022 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote