Skip to content

Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session

SB 365

Vetoed Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: the broadband expansion grant program. (FE)

Data processing Public service commission Telecommunications

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, stopped here
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill makes various changes to the broadband expansion grant program.

Current law requires the Public Service Commission to administer the

broadband expansion grant program, under which PSC designates as “underserved”

areas of the state that are served by fewer than two broadband service providers and

awards grants to eligible applicants for the purpose of constructing broadband

infrastructure in underserved areas. This bill changes the purpose of the grant

program to constructing broadband infrastructure in “unserved areas.” Under

current law, “unserved areas” are areas not served by an Internet service provider

(ISP) that is a fixed wireless service or wired service and that provides service at

actual speeds of at least 20 percent of the upload and download speeds for advanced

telecommunications capability as designated by the Federal Communications

Commission. The bill changes the speed standard for an unserved area to be at least

actual download speeds of 100 megabits per second and upload speeds of 20 megabits

per second.

Current law requires PSC to establish criteria for evaluating applications and

awarding grants under the broadband expansion grant program and requires that

the criteria give priority to projects meeting various standards, such as including

matching funds and involving public-private partnerships. Under the bill, the

criteria must require that projects serve unserved areas. The bill specifies that the

criteria must prioritize projects with 50 percent or more matching funds and projects

that are capable of offering service with either combined download speeds and

upload speeds of 900 megabits per second or greater, or download speeds of 450

megabits per second or greater and upload speeds of 450 megabits per second or

greater. When evaluating a grant application, the bill requires PSC to consider all

federal broadband grant program project areas related to the proposed project. The

bill prohibits PSC from awarding grants for projects that do not include at least 40

percent matching funds or for projects that are not capable of offering download

speeds of 100 megabits per second or greater and upload speeds of 20 megabits per

second or greater (minimum download and upload speeds).

The bill adds a procedure by which an ISP in or near to a project area proposed

in an application for a broadband expansion grant may challenge the awarding of

that grant. An ISP may challenge the grant if that ISP currently provides or will

complete construction to provide broadband service to that area at minimum

download and upload speeds or if that ISP commits to completing construction of

broadband infrastructure and providing broadband service to that area at minimum

download and upload speeds no later than 24 months after the date grants are made

for the grant cycle under which the application was submitted. The bill requires PSC

to evaluate the challenge and prohibits it from funding the project if it determines

as credible the challenging ISP's commitment to provide broadband service that

meets the requirements.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Ballweg (R) , Bernier (R) , Cowles (R) , Darling (R) , Felzkowski (R) , Feyen (R) , Marklein (R) , Nass (R) , Wimberger (R)

23 cosponsors

Armstrong (R) , Cabral-Guevara (R) , Callahan (R) , Dallman (R) , Horlacher (R) , James (R) , Kurtz (R) , Magnafici (R) , Moses (R) , Oldenburg (R) , Petryk (R) , Plumer (R) , Pronschinske (R) , Ramthun (R) , Rozar (R) , Schraa (R) , Spiros (R) , Summerfield (R) , Swearingen (R) , Tauchen (R) , Tranel (R) , Tusler (R) , VanderMeer (R)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Utilities, Technology and Telecommunications, Ayes 3, Noes 2

Passed 3–2 Feb 11, 2022 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Utilities, Technology and Telecommunications, Ayes 3, Noes 2

Passed 3–2 Feb 11, 2022 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted, Ayes 20, Noes 12

Passed 20–12 Feb 15, 2022 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: CONCURRENCE

Passed 60–36 Feb 23, 2022 official source full page

Aye · 60

Not voting · 1

Full history

  1. May 25, 2021 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Marklein, Ballweg, Bernier, Cowles, Darling, Feyen, Nass, Wimberger and Felzkowski; cosponsored by Representatives Summerfield, Oldenburg, Armstrong, Cabral-Guevara, Callahan, Dallman, James, Magnafici, Moses, Petryk, Plumer, Pronschinske, Ramthun, Rozar, Schraa, Spiros, Swearingen, Tauchen, Tranel, Tusler, VanderMeer and Horlacher

  2. May 25, 2021 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Utilities, Technology and Telecommunications

  3. Jun 10, 2021 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jun 22, 2021 · Senate

    Representative Kurtz added as a cosponsor

  5. Jan 26, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Marklein

  6. Feb 2, 2022 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  7. Feb 11, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-15-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  8. Feb 11, 2022 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  9. Feb 11, 2022 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Utilities, Technology and Telecommunications, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  10. Feb 11, 2022 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Utilities, Technology and Telecommunications, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  11. Feb 11, 2022 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. Feb 15, 2022 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Feb 15, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted, Ayes 20, Noes 12

  14. Feb 15, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Feb 15, 2022 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  16. Feb 15, 2022 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 20, Noes 12

  17. Feb 15, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Feb 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  19. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  20. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 9:46 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29

  21. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 60, Noes 36, Paired 2

  25. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Feb 23, 2022 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    LRB correction (Senate Substitute Amendment 1)

  28. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  29. Apr 14, 2022 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-14-2022

  30. Apr 15, 2022 · Senate

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-15-2022

  31. May 17, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  32. May 17, 2022 · Senate

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82