Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session
Relating to: extending the life and tax increment allocation and project cost expenditure periods for Tax Incremental District Number 1 in the village of Marathon City. (FE)
Marathon county Marriage and family therapist Property tax Property tax — Assessment
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill extends the life and the periods during which tax increments may be
allocated and expenditures for project costs may be made for a tax incremental
district (TID) in the village of Marathon City.
Under current law, when a city or village creates a TID, the Department of
Revenue calculates the “tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the
equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at its creation. If the
development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the base
value, a “value increment" is created. The portion of the property taxes received from
the TID that is attributable to the TID's value increment is called a “tax increment.”
The tax increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the
TID project costs. DOR authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID
terminates or, generally, 20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created,
depending on the type of TID and the year in which it was created. Also under
current law, a city or village may not generally make expenditures for project costs
later than five years before the TID's unextended termination date.
Under this bill, tax increments may be allocated for Tax Incremental District
Number 1 in the village of Marathon City until January 3, 2035, which is 33 years
after the TID's creation, expenditures may be made for project costs through January
3, 2023, and the life of the TID is extended for seven years.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Oct 26, 2021 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jun 10, 2021 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Petrowski; cosponsored by Representative Spiros
- Jun 10, 2021 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection
- Sep 29, 2021 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 12, 2021 · Senate
Representative Ramthun added as a cosponsor
- Oct 26, 2021 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 26, 2021 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 26, 2021 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 15, 2022 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1