Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Senate Bill 396

Interest on claims of excessive assessment and for recovery of unlawful property taxes. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 14, 2022. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jun 10, 2021

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Jan 25, 2022

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 23, 2022

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2021 Wisconsin Act 162

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 14, 2022: “Published 3-12-2022”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a person may file a claim with the taxation district where the property is located to recover unlawful property taxes. A person who files a claim must allege at least one of the following as the basis for the claim:

1. The taxation district made a clerical error regarding the description of the property or the computation of the tax.

Read the full summary

2. The assessment included real property improvements that did not exist on the date of the assessment.

3. The property is exempt from taxation.

4. The property is not located in the taxation district.

5. The taxation district made a double assessment of the property.

If the taxation district allows the claim, it pays the claimant the amount of property taxes collected and may include interest at the rate of 0.8 percent a month, computed from the date on which the person filed the claim.

Under current law, a person may also file a claim with the taxation district where the property is located alleging that the assessment of the person's property is excessive. If the taxation district allows the claim, it pays the claimant the amount of the excess and may include interest at the average annual discount rate determined by the last auction of six-month U.S. treasury bills before the filing of the claim per day for the period between the time when the tax was due and the date that the claim was paid. This rate is generally lower than the rate of interest paid on claims to recover unlawful property taxes.

This bill changes the interest rate for payments made on a claim to recover unlawful taxes so that it is the same as the payments made on a claim of excessive assessment.

Under current law, when a taxation district rescinds or refunds property taxes paid by a taxpayer in the district, the district may submit a form to the Department of Revenue to collect from each underlying taxing jurisdiction its proportionate share of the rescinded or refunded amount. However, that amount does not include interest paid by the taxation district on claims for excessive assessment or to recover unlawful property taxes. This bill allows the taxation district to collect from each underlying taxing jurisdiction its proportionate share of the interest paid on claims for excessive assessment or to recover unlawful property taxes.

Who's behind it

5 senators are its ⁠. 3 are Republicans and 2 are Democrats.

19 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 24 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (19)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Revenue vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 14, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Revenue vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Jan 14, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 14, 2022

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 14, 2022

    The governor signed it. It became 2021 Wisconsin Act 162.

  3. Mar 10, 2022

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 23, 2022

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  5. Feb 23, 2022

    The Assembly passed it too.

  6. Feb 17, 2022

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Jan 25, 2022

    The Assembly received it.

  8. Jan 25, 2022

    The Senate passed it.

  9. Jan 25, 2022

    The Senate adopted it.

  10. Jan 14, 2022

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  11. Jan 14, 2022

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  12. Jan 11, 2022

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Jul 26, 2021

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  14. Jul 2, 2021

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Jun 17, 2021

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  16. Jun 10, 2021

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Revenue.

  17. Jun 10, 2021

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jun 10, 2021 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Petrowski, Ballweg, Cowles, Ringhand and L. Taylor; cosponsored by Representatives Brooks, Gundrum, Schraa, Armstrong, Subeck, Brandtjen, Edming, Novak, Spiros, Allen, Kuglitsch, Tittl, Knodl, James, VanderMeer and Tusler

  2. Jun 10, 2021 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Financial Institutions and Revenue

  3. Jun 17, 2021 · Senate

    Representative Dittrich added as a cosponsor

  4. Jul 1, 2021 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Petrowski

  5. Jul 2, 2021 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Jul 26, 2021 · Senate

    Representative Steffen added as a cosponsor

  7. Jan 6, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Petrowski

  8. Jan 11, 2022 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  9. Jan 13, 2022 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  10. Jan 14, 2022 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Jan 14, 2022 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  12. Jan 14, 2022 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  13. Jan 21, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-25-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  14. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Read a second time

  15. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 adopted

  16. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  17. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  18. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  19. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  20. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  21. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  22. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 9:47 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29

  23. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  24. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  26. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  27. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Skowronski added as a cosponsor

  28. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. Feb 23, 2022 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  30. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  31. Mar 10, 2022 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-10-2022

  32. Mar 14, 2022 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-11-2022. 2021 Wisconsin Act 162

  33. Mar 14, 2022 · Senate

    Published 3-12-2022

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote