Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Senate Bill 494

Aquatic plant management plans and permit exemptions

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 15, 2022. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Aug 5, 2021

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Jan 25, 2022

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 23, 2022

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Apr 15, 2022.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2022: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes numerous changes relating to the control of aquatic plants using chemicals or biological agents.

Current law requires the Department of Natural Resources to establish a program for the waters of this state that meet several goals, including implementing efforts to protect and develop native aquatic plants and regulate how aquatic plants are managed. The bill requires that DNR efforts to protect native aquatic plants rely on widely accepted methods supported by peer-reviewed science to suppress or eradicate invasive or nuisance aquatic plants. The bill also requires that DNR plans to regulate aquatic plants ensure invasive and nuisance aquatic plants are suppressed or eradicated to the greatest extent possible.

Read the full summary

Under current law, subject to exceptions, a person may not control aquatic plants in waters of the state by the use of chemicals or the introduction of biological agents without a valid aquatic plant management permit issued by DNR. As a condition of receiving an aquatic plant management permit, DNR may require the applicant to submit a plan for how aquatic plants will be introduced, removed, or controlled. The bill provides that DNR must give equal consideration to plans that will suppress or eradicate invasive or nuisance aquatic plants by use of chemicals and provides that the plan requirements may not impose an undue financial burden on permit applicants or property owners.

The bill also creates exemptions from the permit requirement for the introduction of chemicals or biological agents to a private pond, which the bill defines as “a surface water less than 10 acres in size that is surrounded by the private property of one or more owners, with no public access to the water, and that has either no surface water discharge or surface water discharge that can be controlled.” Under the bill, a person who applies a chemical treatment to a private pond to suppress or eradicate invasive or nuisance aquatic plants is exempt if the person is certified as a commercial applicator by the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection in the aquatic and mosquito pest control category and follows U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency standards for chemical type and use. The bill also exempts a person who applies to a private pond a biological agent to improve water quality at a concentration that does not cause acute or chronic toxicity for aquatic organisms or a dye that is not labeled for herbicide use.

Who's behind it

8 senators are its ⁠. All 8 are Republicans.

12 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 20 names

Authors (8)

Signed on in support (12)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Energy vote on an amendment

Passed, 3 to 2 · Jan 19, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Natural Resources and Energy, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Energy vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Jan 19, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Natural Resources and Energy, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 21 to 12 · Jan 25, 2022

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 17, 2022

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Apr 15, 2022

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Apr 14, 2022

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 23, 2022

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Feb 17, 2022

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Jan 25, 2022

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Jan 25, 2022

    The Senate passed it, 21 to 12.

  8. Jan 25, 2022

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Jan 19, 2022

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  10. Jan 19, 2022

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Natural Resources and Energy, Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  11. Aug 25, 2021

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  12. Aug 18, 2021

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Aug 5, 2021

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Energy.

  14. Aug 5, 2021

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Aug 5, 2021 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Feyen, Ballweg, Cowles, Felzkowski, Jacque, Marklein, Stafsholt and Stroebel; cosponsored by Representatives Steineke, Kitchens, Knodl, Kuglitsch, Loudenbeck, Murphy, Mursau, Rozar, Schraa, Tittl and Tusler

  2. Aug 5, 2021 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Natural Resources and Energy

  3. Aug 18, 2021 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Aug 25, 2021 · Senate

    Representative Dallman added as a cosponsor

  5. Jan 4, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Feyen

  6. Jan 13, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Feyen

  7. Jan 18, 2022 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Jan 19, 2022 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Natural Resources and Energy, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  9. Jan 19, 2022 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Natural Resources and Energy, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  10. Jan 19, 2022 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  11. Jan 21, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-25-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  12. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 adopted

  14. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  16. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 12

  17. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  19. Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  20. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 8:15 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29

  21. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  25. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Feb 23, 2022 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Feb 25, 2022 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  28. Apr 14, 2022 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-14-2022

  29. Apr 15, 2022 · Senate

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-15-2022

  30. May 17, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  31. May 17, 2022 · Senate

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote