Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session
Relating to: censorship on social media platforms and providing a penalty. (FE)
Court — Procedure Damage personal injury Data processing Data processing — Privacy issues Deaf and hearing impaired
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill creates requirements and prohibitions for social media platforms in
the regulation of users and user content. The bill defines “social media platform” as
an Internet site or Internet-based software application, a primary purpose of which,
from the perspective of a user, is to allow users to create personalized pages,
accounts, profiles, or handles for the purpose of sharing information and content and
communicating with other users and the public. A “social media platform” is limited
to a platform that does business in this state and that either has annual gross
revenues of more than $100,000,000, or that has at least 20,000 global users who use
the social media platform per month.
The bill prohibits a social media platform from using post prioritization
(prioritizing certain content ahead of, below, or in a more or less prominent position
than others in a newsfeed, feed, view, or search results) on content or material posted
by or about a candidate for state or local office or an elected official who holds a state,
local, or national office. The bill also prohibits a social media platform from
knowingly censoring, deplatforming (deleting or banning from the social media
platform for more than 60 days), or shadow banning (limiting or eliminating the
exposure of a user, or content posted by a user, to other users of the social media
platform) a candidate for state or local office or an elected official who holds a state,
local, or national office. This prohibition applies only to official pages, accounts,
profiles, or handles relating to a candidate's campaign or an elected official's office
and does not apply to any personal pages, accounts, profiles, or handles. Nor does
the prohibition apply to post prioritization that is based on payments to the social
media platform by the affected candidate or elected official or by a third party. The
bill requires a social media platform to provide users with a method to identify
themselves as candidates or elected officials. The bill also provides that the
prohibition on censorship does not apply to content or material that is obscene or that
constitutes a credible threat to another person. In addition, the bill provides that an
action by a social media platform employee creates a rebuttable presumption that
the social media platform acted knowingly.
Under the bill, a social media platform must notify a user if the platform
knowingly censors the user's content or knowingly deplatforms the user, unless the
censored content is obscene or constitutes a credible threat. The bill also requires
a social media platform to allow a user who has been deplatformed to access or
retrieve all of the user's information, content, material, and data for at least 60 days
after being deplatformed.
Under the bill, a social media platform must publish the standards it uses for
determining how to censor, deplatform, and shadow ban users on the platform. A
social media platform must apply censorship, deplatforming, and shadow banning
standards in a consistent manner among its users on the platform.
The bill also requires a social media platform to inform each user about any
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Bradley (R) , Darling (R) , Nass (R) , Stroebel (R) , Testin (R)
21 cosponsors
Allen (R) , Armstrong (R) , Brandtjen (R) , Cabral-Guevara (R) , Callahan (R) , Dittrich (R) , Edming (R) , Gundrum (R) , Horlacher (R) , Knodl (R) , Kuglitsch (R) , Macco (R) , Magnafici (R) , Moses (R) , Penterman (R) , Rozar (R) , Schraa (R) , Steffen (R) , Tusler (R) , VanderMeer (R) , Wichgers (R)
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2
Passed 3–2 Nov 4, 2021 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Aug 26, 2021 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Bradley, Nass, Darling, Stroebel and Testin; cosponsored by Representatives Horlacher, Callahan, Allen, Armstrong, Brandtjen, Cabral-Guevara, Dittrich, Edming, Gundrum, Knodl, Kuglitsch, Macco, Magnafici, Moses, Penterman, Rozar, Schraa, Tusler, VanderMeer, Wichgers and Steffen
- Aug 26, 2021 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection
- Oct 26, 2021 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 29, 2021 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 4, 2021 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Nov 4, 2021 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Nov 4, 2021 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 15, 2022 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1