Senate Bill 608
The prior year pupil attendance requirement to participate in the Racine Parental Choice Program or the statewide parental choice program and allowing a pupil who changes residence to transfer from the Racine Parental Choice Program or Milwaukee Parental Choice Program to the statewide parental choice program. (FE)
Vetoed by the governor
Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 15, 2022. Lawmakers did not , so it stands.
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 11, 2021
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed 20 to 12
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 22, 2022
-
Governor, stopped here
Vetoed Apr 15, 2022.
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2022: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Prior year pupil attendance requirement Under current law, a pupil must meet at least one of the following criteria to be eligible to participate in the statewide parental choice program (also known as the Wisconsin Parental Choice Program) or the Racine Parental Choice Program: 1) the pupil was enrolled in a public school in the previous school year; 2) the pupil was not enrolled in school in the previous school year; 3) the pupil attended a private school in the WPCP, RPCP, or Milwaukee Parental Choice Program in the previous school year; 4) the pupil was on a waiting list to attend a private school in the WPCP, RPCP, or MPCP in the previous school year; 5) the pupil attended school in another state in the previous school year; or 6) the pupil is enrolling in kindergarten, first grade, or ninth grade in the current school year. This requirement is known as the prior year pupil attendance requirement.
Under the bill, a pupil who attended a private school under the Special Needs Scholarship Program in the previous school year satisfies the prior year pupil attendance requirement to participate in the WPCP or RPCP.
Read the full summary Show less
Pupil transfers from the RPCP or MPCP to the WPCP This bill creates an exception to the application period for the WPCP for a pupil 1) who was participating in the RPCP or MPCP; 2) whose residence changed from the Racine Unified School District or Milwaukee Public Schools school district to a school district in this state other than RUSD or MPS; and 3) who, after the change in residence, wants to participate in the WPCP.
Under current law, a private school participating in the WPCP may accept applications for the following school year between the first weekday in February and the third Thursday in April. Current law provides an exception to this application period that allows the Department of Public Instruction, between the first weekday in August and the third Friday in August, to transfer a pupil's application from one private school participating in the WPCP to another private school participating in the WPCP if all of the following apply:
1. The pupil applied to participate in the WPCP during the immediately preceding application period.
2. A private school participating in the WPCP accepted the pupil's application and verified that the pupil is eligible to participate in the WPCP.
3. The pupil's residence changed after the end of the immediately preceding application period and on or before the third Friday in August, and, after the change, the pupil resides in a school district in this state other than RUSD or MPS.
4. The private school to which the pupil's application is transferred has space available in the pupil's grade.
5. After the change, the pupil resides in a school district that has not exceeded its pupil participation limit in the WPCP.
The bill provides a similar exception to the WPCP application period for a pupil whose residence changes from the RUSD or MPS school district to a school district in this state other than RUSD or MPS after the last weekday in July. Specifically, the bill allows DPI to transfer a pupil's application from a private school participating in the RPCP or MPCP to a private school participating in the WPCP if all of the following apply:
1. The pupil applied to participate in the RPCP or MPCP for the current school year no later than the last weekday in July of the current school year.
2. A private school participating in the RPCP or MPCP accepted the pupil's application and verified that the pupil is eligible to participate in the RPCP or MPCP.
3. If the pupil was required to meet the family income eligibility requirement for the RPCP or MPCP, the private school to which the pupil's application is transferred verifies that the pupil also meets the family income eligibility requirement for the WPCP.
4. The pupil's residence changed after the last weekday in April, after the pupil's application was submitted, and on or before the third Friday in August, and, after the change, the pupil resides in a school district in this state other than RUSD or MPS.
5. The private school to which the pupil's application is transferred has space available in the pupil's grade.
6. After the change, the pupil resides in a school district that has not exceeded its pupil participation limit in the WPCP.
The bill also specifies that, for all of the transfer options described above, 1) the deadline for DPI to transfer an application is the third Friday in September; and 2) the private school to which an application is transferred must, between the first weekday in August and the third Friday in August, notify DPI of the pupil's change in residence and verify that the other conditions for transfer apply.
In addition, the bill provides a similar exception during the 2021-22 school year that allows DPI to transfer a pupil's application from a private school participating in the RPCP or MPCP to a private school participating in the WPCP if 1) the pupil's application was submitted no later than April 20, 2021; 2) the pupil's residence changed from the RUSD or MPS school district to a school district in this state other than RUSD or MPS after April 20, 2021, and on or before August 20, 2021; and 3) the private school to which the pupil's application is transferred notifies DPI between November 1, 2021, and November 12, 2021, of the pupil's change in residence and verifies that the other conditions for transfer apply.
Who's behind it
John Jagler, a Republican, is its .
2 more lawmakers .
See all 3 names Hide the names
Author (1)
- John Jagler · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (2)
- Michael Schraa · Republican, Assembly
- Chuck Wichgers · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Education vote to recommend it
Passed, 4 to 3 · Oct 21, 2021
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 4, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 20 to 12 · Oct 25, 2021 · 1 didn't vote
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (20)
- Alberta Darling (R, 8)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Dale Kooyenga (R, 5)
- Dan Feyen (R, 20)
- Devin LeMahieu (R, 9)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Eric Wimberger (R, 2)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Jerry Petrowski (R, 29)
- Joan Ballweg (R, 14)
- John Jagler (R, 13)
- Julian Bradley (R, 28)
- Kathleen Bernier (R, 23)
- Mary Felzkowski (R, 12)
- Patrick Testin (R, 24)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Rob Stafsholt (R, 10)
- Roger Roth (R, 19)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
No (12)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Brad Pfaff (D, 32)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Janet Bewley (D, 25)
- Janis Ringhand (D, 15)
- Jeff Smith (D, 31)
- Jon Erpenbach (D, 27)
- Kelda Roys (D, 26)
- LaTonya Johnson (D, 6)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Melissa Agard (D, 16)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
Didn't vote (1)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 17, 2022
The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.
-
Apr 15, 2022
The governor vetoed it.
-
Apr 14, 2022
Sent to the governor.
-
Feb 22, 2022
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Dec 7, 2021
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Oct 25, 2021
The Assembly received it.
-
Oct 25, 2021
The Senate passed it, 20 to 12.
-
Oct 22, 2021
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 22, 2021
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Oct 21, 2021
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 3.
-
Oct 14, 2021
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 11, 2021
Sent to the Senate Committee on Education.
-
Oct 11, 2021
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 11, 2021 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Jagler; cosponsored by Representative Schraa
- Oct 11, 2021 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Education
- Oct 14, 2021 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 21, 2021 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 21, 2021 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 4, Noes 3
- Oct 21, 2021 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Oct 22, 2021 · Senate
Representative Wichgers added as a cosponsor
- Oct 22, 2021 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 22, 2021 · Senate
Placed on calendar 10-25-2021 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Oct 25, 2021 · Senate
Read a second time
- Oct 25, 2021 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 25, 2021 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Oct 25, 2021 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 20, Noes 12
- Oct 25, 2021 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 25, 2021 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Dec 7, 2021 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-22-2022 by Committee on Rules
- Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
- Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 22, 2022 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Feb 25, 2022 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 14, 2022 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-14-2022
- Apr 15, 2022 · Senate
Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-15-2022
- May 17, 2022 · Senate
Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
- May 17, 2022 · Senate
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
Terms on this page
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote