Senate Bill 629
A shovel-ready workforce housing development site program. (FE)
Vetoed by the governor
Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 15, 2022. Lawmakers did not , so it stands.
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 20, 2021
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Feb 22, 2022
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 24, 2022
-
Governor, stopped here
Vetoed Apr 15, 2022.
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2022: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill requires the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation to implement a program under which it must certify residential real estate developments as shovel-ready. Under the bill, a site is eligible for certification if all of the following apply:
1. The site is zoned for residential development and has clear title.
Read the full summary Show less
2. The residential development, or prospective residential development, includes at least 20 new single-family dwelling units each of which is on a lot that is no larger than one-quarter acre or includes a multifamily dwelling that has at least 16 dwelling units with at least eight dwelling units per acre.
3. Any preliminary environmental assessments of the site are complete.
4. Site maps, including a U.S. geological survey topographical map, and aerial photographs are complete.
5. Sufficient planning, surveys, title work, and soil analyses for the site are complete.
6. Public utilities and infrastructure are in place.
7. Any appropriate site studies, including a wetland delineation study, are complete.
8. The site developer attests that the development fee for the project will not exceed $5,000 per dwelling unit.
9. All required permits are in place or will be in place no later than 60 days after WEDC certifies the site as shovel-ready.
The bill also requires WEDC to establish procedures to expedite permits for sites certified as shovel-ready and requires local governmental units and executive branch state agencies to give priority to, and use all reasonable means to expedite, permits required for sites certified as shovel-ready.
Who's behind it
Dan Feyen, a Republican, is its .
8 more lawmakers .
See all 9 names Hide the names
Author (1)
- Dan Feyen · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (8)
- Dave Armstrong · Republican, Assembly
- Alex Dallman · Republican, Assembly
- Barbara Dittrich · Republican, Assembly
- James Edming · Republican, Assembly
- Joel Kitchens · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Krug · Republican, Assembly
- Clint Moses · Republican, Assembly
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Economic and Workforce Development vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 9, 2022
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Economic and Workforce Development, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Economic and Workforce Development vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 9, 2022
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Economic and Workforce Development, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 17, 2022
The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.
-
Apr 15, 2022
The governor vetoed it.
-
Apr 14, 2022
Sent to the governor.
-
Feb 24, 2022
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Feb 23, 2022
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 23, 2022
The Assembly received it.
-
Feb 22, 2022
The Senate passed it.
-
Feb 22, 2022
The Senate adopted it.
-
Feb 9, 2022
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Feb 9, 2022
“Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Economic and Workforce Development, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Jan 26, 2022
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Nov 11, 2021
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Oct 27, 2021
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 26, 2021
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Oct 20, 2021
Sent to the Senate Committee on Economic and Workforce Development.
-
Oct 20, 2021
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 20, 2021 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Feyen; cosponsored by Representatives Dallman, Armstrong, Dittrich, Kitchens, Moses and Edming
- Oct 20, 2021 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Economic and Workforce Development
- Oct 26, 2021 · Senate
Representative Krug added as a cosponsor
- Oct 27, 2021 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 28, 2021 · Senate
LRB correction
- Nov 11, 2021 · Senate
Representative Murphy added as a cosponsor
- Jan 26, 2022 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 3, 2022 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Feyen
- Feb 9, 2022 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 9, 2022 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Economic and Workforce Development, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 9, 2022 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Economic and Workforce Development, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 9, 2022 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 18, 2022 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-22-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 22, 2022 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 22, 2022 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 22, 2022 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 22, 2022 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 22, 2022 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 22, 2022 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 8:04 AM on 2-24-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 30
- Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 24, 2022 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 2, 2022 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 14, 2022 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-14-2022
- Apr 15, 2022 · Senate
Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-15-2022
- May 17, 2022 · Senate
Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
- May 17, 2022 · Senate
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
Terms on this page
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote