Skip to content

Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session

SB 678

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: nitrates under the well compensation program; eligibility for producer-led watershed, lake, and river protection grants; and the annual allocation plan for county conservation grants. (FE)

Agriculture trade and consumer protection department of Farmer Lakes Natural resources department of — Environmental protection Soil and soil conservation Water supply Waterways and water power Waterworks Wells Wild turkey

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill expands eligibility for nitrate-contaminated wells under the well

compensation grant program; expands eligibility for producer-led watershed

protection grants, lake protection grants, and river protection grants; and creates a

factor to be considered during preparation of the annual allocation plan for soil and

water resource conservation grants to counties.

Nitrates under the well compensation grant program

The bill makes changes to the well compensation grant program administered

by the Department of Natural Resources. Under the program currently, an

individual owner or renter of a contaminated private well, subject to eligibility

requirements, may apply for a grant from DNR to cover a portion of the costs to treat

the water, reconstruct the well, construct a new well, connect to a public water

supply, or fill and seal the well.

Under current law, a well that is contaminated only by nitrates, and not by any

other substance, is eligible for a grant only if the well is a water supply for livestock,

is used at least three months in each year, provides more than 100 gallons of water

per day for consumption by livestock, and contains nitrates in excess of 40 parts per

million. The bill removes the requirements that a water supply contaminated only

by nitrates be used for livestock, provide more than 100 gallons of water per day, and

contain nitrates in excess of 40 parts per million in order to be eligible for a grant

under the program. Under the bill, a well that is contaminated only by nitrates is

eligible for a grant if the well is used at least three months in each year.

Current law requires DNR to allocate money for payments of claims under the

program according to the order in which claims are received. The bill retains this

requirement but provides that, among claims for contamination only by nitrates,

DNR must allocate payments according to a specified priority ranking based on

levels of nitrate contamination.

Also under current law, a residential well that is contaminated only by bacteria

is not eligible for a grant unless the well is in an area that is contaminated by fecal

bacteria and the contamination is caused by livestock. The bill eliminates this

restriction.

The bill also requires DNR to award grants under the program only for the

remediation method that is most effective for the health and welfare of the claimant.

Finally, the bill requires DNR to report to the Joint Committee on Finance after the

end of each fiscal year on the number of applicants under the well compensation

program and the number and amount of grants provided during that fiscal year.

Producer-led watershed protection grants

Under current law, the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer

Protection administers a program to provide watershed protection grants to

producer-led groups made up of farmers located in one watershed. The bill allows

grants under the program to be awarded to producer-led groups that are made up

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Ballweg (R) , Bernier (R) , Cowles (R) , Petrowski (R) , Pfaff (D) , Ringhand (D) , Roys (D) , Smith (D) , Testin (R) , Wimberger (R)

20 cosponsors

Agard (D) , Brostoff (D) , Considine (D) , Hong (D) , Kitchens (R) , Krug (R) , Milroy (D) , Mursau (R) , Neubauer (D) , Novak (R) , Oldenburg (R) , Penterman (R) , Petryk, Subeck and Spiros , Plumer (R) , Pope (D) , Shankland (D) , Spreitzer, Vining, Conley, Ohnstad, Emerson and Tusler , Tauchen (R) , Tranel (R) , Vruwink (D)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Agriculture and Tourism, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Dec 16, 2021 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Agriculture and Tourism, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Dec 16, 2021 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Nov 8, 2021 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Cowles, Testin, Ballweg, Bernier, Petrowski, Pfaff, Ringhand, Roys, Smith and Wimberger; cosponsored by Representatives Kitchens, Novak, Tranel, Shankland, Krug, Hong, Milroy, Mursau, Neubauer, Oldenburg, Penterman, Plumer and Tauchen

  2. Nov 8, 2021 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture and Tourism

  3. Nov 8, 2021 · Senate

    Representatives Petryk, Subeck and Spiros added as cosponsors

  4. Nov 9, 2021 · Senate

    Senator Agard added as a coauthor

  5. Nov 9, 2021 · Senate

    Representative Considine added as a cosponsor

  6. Nov 10, 2021 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  7. Nov 10, 2021 · Senate

    Representative Pope added as a cosponsor

  8. Nov 11, 2021 · Senate

    Representatives Spreitzer, Vining, Conley, Ohnstad, Emerson and Tusler added as cosponsors

  9. Dec 13, 2021 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Cowles

  10. Dec 15, 2021 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Dec 16, 2021 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  12. Dec 16, 2021 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Agriculture and Tourism, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  13. Dec 16, 2021 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Agriculture and Tourism, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  14. Dec 16, 2021 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  15. Jan 4, 2022 · Senate

    Representative Vruwink added as a cosponsor

  16. Jan 21, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-25-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  17. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Read a second time

  18. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  19. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  20. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  21. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  22. Jan 25, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  23. Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  24. Mar 8, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Brostoff added as a cosponsor

  25. Mar 10, 2022 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  26. Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1