Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session
Relating to: nitrates under the well compensation program; eligibility for producer-led watershed, lake, and river protection grants; and the annual allocation plan for county conservation grants. (FE)
Agriculture trade and consumer protection department of Farmer Lakes Natural resources department of — Environmental protection Soil and soil conservation Water supply Waterways and water power Waterworks Wells Wild turkey
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill expands eligibility for nitrate-contaminated wells under the well
compensation grant program; expands eligibility for producer-led watershed
protection grants, lake protection grants, and river protection grants; and creates a
factor to be considered during preparation of the annual allocation plan for soil and
water resource conservation grants to counties.
Nitrates under the well compensation grant program
The bill makes changes to the well compensation grant program administered
by the Department of Natural Resources. Under the program currently, an
individual owner or renter of a contaminated private well, subject to eligibility
requirements, may apply for a grant from DNR to cover a portion of the costs to treat
the water, reconstruct the well, construct a new well, connect to a public water
supply, or fill and seal the well.
Under current law, a well that is contaminated only by nitrates, and not by any
other substance, is eligible for a grant only if the well is a water supply for livestock,
is used at least three months in each year, provides more than 100 gallons of water
per day for consumption by livestock, and contains nitrates in excess of 40 parts per
million. The bill removes the requirements that a water supply contaminated only
by nitrates be used for livestock, provide more than 100 gallons of water per day, and
contain nitrates in excess of 40 parts per million in order to be eligible for a grant
under the program. Under the bill, a well that is contaminated only by nitrates is
eligible for a grant if the well is used at least three months in each year.
Current law requires DNR to allocate money for payments of claims under the
program according to the order in which claims are received. The bill retains this
requirement but provides that, among claims for contamination only by nitrates,
DNR must allocate payments according to a specified priority ranking based on
levels of nitrate contamination.
Also under current law, a residential well that is contaminated only by bacteria
is not eligible for a grant unless the well is in an area that is contaminated by fecal
bacteria and the contamination is caused by livestock. The bill eliminates this
restriction.
The bill also requires DNR to award grants under the program only for the
remediation method that is most effective for the health and welfare of the claimant.
Finally, the bill requires DNR to report to the Joint Committee on Finance after the
end of each fiscal year on the number of applicants under the well compensation
program and the number and amount of grants provided during that fiscal year.
Producer-led watershed protection grants
Under current law, the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer
Protection administers a program to provide watershed protection grants to
producer-led groups made up of farmers located in one watershed. The bill allows
grants under the program to be awarded to producer-led groups that are made up
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Ballweg (R) , Bernier (R) , Cowles (R) , Petrowski (R) , Pfaff (D) , Ringhand (D) , Roys (D) , Smith (D) , Testin (R) , Wimberger (R)
20 cosponsors
Agard (D) , Brostoff (D) , Considine (D) , Hong (D) , Kitchens (R) , Krug (R) , Milroy (D) , Mursau (R) , Neubauer (D) , Novak (R) , Oldenburg (R) , Penterman (R) , Petryk, Subeck and Spiros , Plumer (R) , Pope (D) , Shankland (D) , Spreitzer, Vining, Conley, Ohnstad, Emerson and Tusler , Tauchen (R) , Tranel (R) , Vruwink (D)
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Agriculture and Tourism, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Dec 16, 2021 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Agriculture and Tourism, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Dec 16, 2021 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Nov 8, 2021 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Cowles, Testin, Ballweg, Bernier, Petrowski, Pfaff, Ringhand, Roys, Smith and Wimberger; cosponsored by Representatives Kitchens, Novak, Tranel, Shankland, Krug, Hong, Milroy, Mursau, Neubauer, Oldenburg, Penterman, Plumer and Tauchen
- Nov 8, 2021 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture and Tourism
- Nov 8, 2021 · Senate
Representatives Petryk, Subeck and Spiros added as cosponsors
- Nov 9, 2021 · Senate
Senator Agard added as a coauthor
- Nov 9, 2021 · Senate
Representative Considine added as a cosponsor
- Nov 10, 2021 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Nov 10, 2021 · Senate
Representative Pope added as a cosponsor
- Nov 11, 2021 · Senate
Representatives Spreitzer, Vining, Conley, Ohnstad, Emerson and Tusler added as cosponsors
- Dec 13, 2021 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Cowles
- Dec 15, 2021 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 16, 2021 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Dec 16, 2021 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Agriculture and Tourism, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Dec 16, 2021 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Agriculture and Tourism, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Dec 16, 2021 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 4, 2022 · Senate
Representative Vruwink added as a cosponsor
- Jan 21, 2022 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-25-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Jan 25, 2022 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jan 25, 2022 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 adopted
- Jan 25, 2022 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 25, 2022 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Jan 25, 2022 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Jan 25, 2022 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 25, 2022 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Mar 8, 2022 · Assembly
Representative Brostoff added as a cosponsor
- Mar 10, 2022 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1