Skip to content

Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session

SB 68

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: farmland preservation implementation grants, agreements, and tax credits and making an appropriation. (FE)

Agriculture trade and consumer protection department of Farmland preservation

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill makes the following changes involving farmland preservation

implementation grants and agreements and farmland preservation tax credits:

1. Decreases the minimum required length of a farmland preservation

agreement between the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection

and a farmland owner to 10 years from 15 years. Under current law, a farmland

owner who enters into a farmland preservation agreement with DATCP may be

eligible to receive farmland preservation tax credits for his or her qualifying acres

of farmland.

2. Requires DATCP to include in a report submitted to the Board of Agriculture,

Trade and Consumer Protection, the Joint Committee on Finance, the standing

committees of the legislature with jurisdiction over agriculture, the Department of

Revenue, and the Department of Administration a review of the tax credit amounts

for qualifying acres for the farmland preservation tax credit and recommendations

for the tax credit levels for qualifying acres of farmland. Current law requires

DATCP to submit a report about farmland and the farmland preservation program

once every two years to the board, DOR, and DOA.

3. Under the farmland preservation tax credit, increases from $7.50 to $10 the

amount that may be claimed, per qualifying acre, for qualifying acres that are located

in a farmland preservation zoning district but are not subject to a farmland

preservation agreement.

4. Under the farmland preservation tax credit, increases from $5 to $10 the

amount that may be claimed, per qualifying acre, for qualifying acres that are subject

to a farmland preservation agreement but are not located in a farmland preservation

zoning district.

5. Under the farmland preservation tax credit, increases from $10 to $12.50 the

amount that may be claimed, per qualifying acre, for qualifying acres that are located

in a farmland preservation zoning district and are subject to a farmland preservation

agreement.

6. Adds a new category of farmland that qualifies for the farmland preservation

tax credit. A credit of $10 per acre may be claimed for farmland that is located in a

farmland preservation area, but only to the extent that the acres are covered by an

agricultural conservation easement.

7. Authorizes DATCP to award grants to cities, villages, towns, counties,

regional planning commissions, and tribal governments for various purposes related

to implementing a county's certified farmland preservation plan. Under the bill,

DATCP must enter into a contract with a grant recipient before distributing grant

funds, and the contract must identify costs eligible for reimbursement through the

grant for the following activities: 1) certifying a farmland preservation zoning

ordinance for the first time; 2) enrolling land in farmland preservation agreements;

3) designating an agricultural enterprise area or facilitating agricultural

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: L. Taylor (D) , Pfaff (D) , Ringhand (D) , Smith (D) , Testin (R)

26 cosponsors

Allen (R) , Anderson (D) , B. Meyers (D) , Baldeh (D) , Bowen (D) , Cabrera (D) , Considine (D) , Drake (D) , Emerson (D) , Hebl (D) , Moses (R) , Mursau (R) , Neubauer (D) , Novak (R) , Oldenburg (R) , Penterman (R) , Plumer and Kitchens , Rozar (R) , Shankland (D) , Skowronski (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Subeck (D) , Tittl (R) , Tranel (R) , VanderMeer (R) , Vruwink (D)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Agriculture and Tourism, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Feb 11, 2021 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 5, 2021 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Testin, L. Taylor, Pfaff, Ringhand and Smith; cosponsored by Representatives Oldenburg, Novak, Spreitzer, Anderson, Baldeh, Bowen, Cabrera, Considine, Drake, Emerson, Hebl, B. Meyers, Moses, Mursau, Rozar, Shankland, Skowronski, Subeck, Tranel, VanderMeer and Vruwink

  2. Feb 5, 2021 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture and Tourism

  3. Feb 9, 2021 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 11, 2021 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  5. Feb 11, 2021 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Agriculture and Tourism, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  6. Feb 11, 2021 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  7. Feb 11, 2021 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Feb 25, 2021 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Mar 9, 2021 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Mar 10, 2021 · Senate

    Representatives Plumer and Kitchens added as cosponsors

  11. Apr 7, 2021 · Senate

    Representative Allen added as a cosponsor

  12. Apr 13, 2021 · Senate

    Representative Neubauer added as a cosponsor

  13. Apr 14, 2021 · Senate

    Representative Tittl added as a cosponsor

  14. Oct 14, 2021 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Testin

  15. Feb 3, 2022 · Senate

    Representative Penterman added as a cosponsor

  16. Mar 15, 2022 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1