Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Senate Bill 714

Public access to records concerning the conduct of law enforcement officers. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 19, 2021

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 15, 2022: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill creates a number of requirements under Wisconsin's public records law in connection with certain records relating to law enforcement officers.

Under the bill, all of the following records are subject to disclosure under the public records law without prior notice to the record subject:

Read the full summary

1. Any record relating to the report, investigation, or findings of any incident involving the discharge of a firearm at a person by a law enforcement officer or an incident in which the use of force by a law enforcement officer against a person resulted in death or in great bodily harm.

2. Any record relating to an incident in which a sustained finding was made that a law enforcement officer engaged in sexual assault involving a member of the public. The bill defines “sustained finding” to mean “a final determination by an investigating agency, commission, board, hearing officer, or arbitrator, following an investigation and opportunity for an administrative appeal, if applicable, that the conduct of a law enforcement officer violated law or law enforcement agency policy.” 3. Any record relating to an incident in which a sustained finding was made that a law enforcement officer used unreasonable or excessive force.

4. Any record relating to an incident in which a sustained finding was made that a law enforcement officer failed to intervene against another officer using force that was clearly unreasonable or excessive.

5. Any record relating to an incident in which a sustained finding was made of dishonesty by a law enforcement officer directly relating to the reporting, investigation, or prosecution of a crime, or directly relating to the reporting or investigation of misconduct by another law enforcement officer, including any sustained finding of perjury, false statements, filing false reports, or the destruction, falsification, or concealment of evidence.

6. Any record relating to an incident in which a sustained finding was made that a law enforcement officer engaged in conduct, including verbal statements, writings, online posts, recordings, or gestures, involving prejudice or discrimination against a person on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military or veteran status.

7. Any record relating to an incident in which a sustained finding was made that a law enforcement officer made an unlawful arrest or conducted an unlawful search.

Under the bill, subject to a number of exceptions, a record of an incident specified above that is the subject of an active criminal or administrative investigation may be withheld.

Under the bill, records subject to disclosure above may be withheld or redacted for any of the following purposes:

1. To remove the home address, home e-mail address, home telephone number, or social security number of a law enforcement officer.

2. To preserve the anonymity of whistleblowers, complainants, victims, and witnesses.

3. To protect confidential medical, financial, or other information of which disclosure is specifically prohibited by federal law or would cause an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy that clearly outweighs the strong public interest in disclosure of records about misconduct and serious use of force by law enforcement officers.

4. To protect the safety of an individual identified in a record in a case in which there is a specific, articulable, and particularized reason to believe that disclosure of the record would pose a significant danger to that individual.

Finally, under the bill, if criminal charges are filed related to an incident in which misconduct by a law enforcement officer occurred or in which force was used, the disclosure of records otherwise subject to disclosure under the bill may be delayed until a verdict on those charges is returned at trial or, if a plea of guilty or no contest is entered, the time to withdraw the plea. Also, the bill prohibits the disclosure of records regarding a civilian complaint against a law enforcement officer if the complaint is unfounded or frivolous.

Who's behind it

4 senators are its ⁠. All 4 are Democrats.

12 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 16 names

Authors (4)

Signed on in support (12)

What happened

  1. Mar 15, 2022

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Nov 19, 2021

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.

  3. Nov 19, 2021

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 19, 2021 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Larson, Roys, Johnson and Agard; cosponsored by Representatives Brostoff, Bowen, Hong, Moore Omokunde, Anderson, Baldeh, Drake, Hebl, L. Myers, Cabrera, Stubbs and Spreitzer

  2. Nov 19, 2021 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  3. Mar 15, 2022 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor