Senate Bill 720
Changes to the administration of the code of ethics, as recommended by the Ethics Commission
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 15, 2022. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Nov 19, 2021
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Feb 15, 2022
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 23, 2022
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2021 Wisconsin Act 267
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 15, 2022: “Published 4-16-2022”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill bill makes various changes to the administration of the code of ethics, as recommended by the Ethics Commission.
The bill eliminates a requirement that the Ethics Commission compile and post on its Internet site for access by the public information received by the commission from state agencies and related to certain pending contracts and orders with the agencies. The bill also eliminates a requirement that the commission regularly, during the course of a legislative session, give reports to the legislature that provide information about licensed lobbyists, principals, and their lobbying activities.
Read the full summary Show less
The bill changes the definition of “security” as that term is used in connection with the types of financial information an individual required to file with the Ethics Commission must disclose on his or her statement of economic interests. Current law requires state public office holders and certain state employees to annually file a statement of economic interests and to identify the employers, investments, real estate, commercial clients, and creditors of the individual and his or her family members.
Current law requires a state public official to file a statement of economic interests with the commission no later than April 30 of any year in which the individual held office on January 1 of that year. The bill modifies current law so that an official must file the statement only if he or she held office on January 1 and for at least 14 days. The bill also requires an official to file a statement no later than 21 days following the date on which the official leaves office. The individual is then not required to file another statement of economic interests until such time as the individual again becomes a state public official.
Under the bill, if a state or local public official receives an item that the code of ethics does not permit the official to accept or retain, the official must do one of the following:
1. Give the item to the official's agency to use or sell, except that the agency may not sell the item to any government employee or official.
2. Give the item to another state or local agency or to a public institution, such as a local school, library, or museum, that can use the item.
3. Give the item to a charitable organization, not including a charitable organization to which the official or his or her immediate family is associated.
4. Return the item to the donor.
5. If the donor is neither a lobbyist nor a principal (a person who employs a lobbyist), purchase the item at its full retail value and keep the item.
This provision codifies the guideline issued by the Ethics Commission for the disposition of gifts received by state and local public officials.
Finally, the bill repeals a provision that prohibits an officer or employee of a state agency from requesting appropriations for that agency in excess of the appropriations already requested. The U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Wisconsin, in Barnett v. State Ethics Board , 817 F. Supp. 67 (1993), found this to be an unconstitutional infringement on free speech.
Who's behind it
Kathleen Bernier, a Republican, is its .
4 more lawmakers .
See all 5 names Hide the names
Author (1)
- Kathleen Bernier · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (4)
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara · Republican, Senate
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- John Spiros · Republican, Assembly
- Chuck Wichgers · Republican, Assembly
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Elections vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 9, 2022
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Elections vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 9, 2022
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 15, 2022
The new law was published.
-
Apr 15, 2022
The governor signed it. It became 2021 Wisconsin Act 267.
-
Apr 14, 2022
Sent to the governor.
-
Feb 23, 2022
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Feb 17, 2022
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 15, 2022
The Assembly received it.
-
Feb 15, 2022
The Senate passed it.
-
Feb 15, 2022
The Senate adopted it.
-
Feb 9, 2022
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Feb 9, 2022
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Dec 14, 2021
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Nov 19, 2021
Sent to the Senate Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics.
-
Nov 19, 2021
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Nov 19, 2021 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Bernier; cosponsored by Representatives Wichgers, Cabral-Guevara, Murphy and Spiros
- Nov 19, 2021 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics
- Dec 14, 2021 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 25, 2022 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Bernier
- Feb 9, 2022 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 9, 2022 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 9, 2022 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 9, 2022 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 11, 2022 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-15-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 15, 2022 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 15, 2022 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 15, 2022 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 15, 2022 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 15, 2022 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 15, 2022 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 15, 2022 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 17, 2022 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 8:49 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 23, 2022 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 2, 2022 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 14, 2022 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-14-2022
- Apr 15, 2022 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-15-2022. 2021 Wisconsin Act 267
- Apr 15, 2022 · Senate
Published 4-16-2022
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote