Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session
Relating to: expanding the treatment alternatives and diversion programs. (FE)
Alcohol and other drug abuse Justice department of Mental health
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the Department of Justice, in collaboration with the
Department of Corrections and the Department of Health Services, awards grants
to counties and tribes that have established qualifying treatment alternatives and
diversion (TAD) programs that offer alcohol or drug treatment services as
alternatives to prosecution or incarceration in order to reduce recidivism, promote
public safety, and reduce prison and jail populations.
Under the bill, a program funded by a TAD grant need not focus solely on alcohol
and other drug treatment, but may provide treatment programs for a person who has
any mental illness.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Ballweg (R) , Carpenter (D) , Jacque (R) , Johnson (D) , Larson (D) , Marklein (R) , Ringhand (D) , Roys (D) , Wirch (D)
32 cosponsors
Andraca (D) , Armstrong (R) , Bowen (D) , Brostoff (D) , Conley (D) , Considine (D) , Emerson (D) , Goyke (D) , Hebl (D) , J. Rodriguez (R) , Krug (R) , Kurtz (R) , Milroy (D) , Murphy (R) , Mursau (R) , Neubauer (D) , Novak (R) , Pope (D) , Riemer (D) , Schraa (R) , Shankland (D) , Shelton (D) , Sinicki (D) , Snyder (R) , Spiros (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Steffen (R) , Stubbs (D) , Tittl (R) , Vining (D) , Vruwink (D) , Wichgers (R)
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 7, Noes 0
Passed 7–0 Feb 9, 2022 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Fiscal estimate requested from the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, by the committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 96 (1), Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 11, 2022 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Dec 17, 2021 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Jacque, Ringhand, Carpenter, Johnson, Larson, Marklein, Roys, Wirch and Ballweg; cosponsored by Representatives Tittl, Goyke, Andraca, Armstrong, Bowen, Brostoff, Conley, Considine, Emerson, Hebl, Krug, Kurtz, Milroy, Murphy, Mursau, Neubauer, Novak, Pope, Riemer, J. Rodriguez, Schraa, Shankland, Shelton, Sinicki, Snyder, Spiros, Spreitzer, Steffen, Stubbs, Vining, Vruwink and Wichgers
- Dec 17, 2021 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
- Jan 20, 2022 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 8, 2022 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 9, 2022 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Feb 9, 2022 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 11, 2022 · Senate
Fiscal estimate requested from the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, by the committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 96 (1), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 11, 2022 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-15-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 15, 2022 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 15, 2022 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 15, 2022 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 15, 2022 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 15, 2022 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 15, 2022 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 15, 2022 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 10, 2022 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 15, 2022 · Assembly
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1