Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session
Relating to: intrastate telecommunications service and video communication service initiated from a telephone or video communication device designated for use by inmates in a jail or state prison, extending the time limit for emergency rule procedures, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Administrative rules Corrections department of County Jail Prison Telecommunications Telephone
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill prohibits the Department of Corrections and counties from entering
into contracts for intrastate telecommunications service or video communication
service that is initiated from a telephone or video communication device designated
for use by inmates in a jail or state prison (inmate telephone or video communication
service) if those contracts do not comply with rules promulgated by DOC.
The bill requires DOC to promulgate rules regarding the rates, tolls, and
charges and the terms and conditions of inmate telephone or video communication
service. Under the bill, these rules must follow the principle that inmates, whether
convicted or awaiting trial, who place telephone calls or initiate video
communication, and persons receiving telephone calls or video communication from
inmates, should not be subject to rates, tolls, and charges that exceed those that
major, national prepaid wireless telephone providers charge their customers. The
bill also prohibits any rate, toll, or charge from being imposed for a telephone call or
video communication with an inmate's attorney placed from a telephone or video
communication device designated for use by inmates.
Before a county may enter into a contract for inmate telephone or video
communication service, the bill requires the county to submit the contract to DOC
for approval. Under the bill, DOC may not approve such a contract unless it complies
with its rules. The bill provides that a county contract entered into without prior
DOC approval is void.
Under the bill, a DOC contract for inmate telephone or video communication
service that violates DOC rules is void.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Agard (D) , Carpenter (D) , Johnson (D) , Roys (D)
26 cosponsors
Anderson (D) , Andraca (D) , Baldeh (D) , Brostoff (D) , Cabral-Guevara (R) , Conley (D) , Considine (D) , Drake (D) , Emerson (D) , Goyke (D) , Haywood (D) , Hebl (D) , Hong (D) , L. Myers (D) , Moore Omokunde (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Ortiz-Velez (D) , Pope (D) , Shelton (D) , Sinicki (D) , Snodgrass (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Stubbs (D) , Subeck (D) , Vining (D) , Vruwink (D)
Full history
- Dec 17, 2021 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Johnson, Agard, Carpenter and Roys; cosponsored by Representatives Baldeh, Goyke, Hong, Stubbs, Conley, Andraca, Snodgrass, Shelton, Anderson, Brostoff, Cabral-Guevara, Considine, Drake, Emerson, Haywood, Hebl, Moore Omokunde, L. Myers, Ohnstad, Ortiz-Velez, Pope, Sinicki, Spreitzer, Subeck, Vining and Vruwink
- Dec 17, 2021 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
- Mar 15, 2022 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
- Apr 4, 2022 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received