Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session
Relating to: no-knock search warrants and certain expenditures of federal moneys by first class cities. (FE)
Federal aid Milwaukee — City Milwaukee — School Police Search warrant
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law as provided in the U.S. Supreme Court case
Richards v.
Wisconsin
, a law enforcement officer may execute a search warrant without knocking
and announcing his or her presence if he or she has a reasonable suspicion that
knocking and announcing his or her presence, under the particular circumstances,
would be dangerous or futile or would inhibit the effective investigation of the crime.
This bill creates a statutory provision that provides that right to law enforcement
officers and further provides that:
1. No city, village, town, or county may adopt an ordinance or policy that
restricts a law enforcement officer's ability to execute an unannounced search
warrant.
2. No board of fire and police commissioners may prescribe rules or regulations
that restrict a law enforcement officer's ability to execute an unannounced search
warrant.
3. No sheriff or chief of a law enforcement agency may adopt a policy that
restricts a law enforcement officer's ability to execute an unannounced search
warrant.
4. No mayor or common council may issue an order that restricts a law
enforcement officer's ability to execute an unannounced search warrant.
The bill also requires a first class city (currently, only the city of Milwaukee) to
expend a portion of the moneys it receives under the federal American Rescue Plan
Act of 2021 to fund operations of the city's police department. The portion that must
be expended for these purposes is the total amount of ARPA funds received by the
city multiplied by the result of dividing the amount that the city expended in 2021
for law enforcement purposes by the total amount expended by the city from its
general fund in 2021 for all purposes. The bill also requires that in any year that a
first class city receives ARPA funds, the city must expend at least as much from its
general fund for the city's police department as it did in 2021.
Sponsors
Introduced by: Jacque (R) , Wanggaard (R)
25 cosponsors
Armstrong (R) , Born (R) , Brandtjen (R) , Callahan (R) , Dallman (R) , Dittrich (R) , Edming (R) , Gundrum (R) , James (R) , Kitchens (R) , Knodl (R) , Krug (R) , Kuglitsch (R) , Kurtz (R) , Macco (R) , Murphy (R) , Novak (R) , Petersen (R) , Plumer (R) , Skowronski (R) , Steffen (R) , Swearingen (R) , Tittl (R) , Tusler (R) , Wichgers (R)
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 2
Passed 5–2 Mar 2, 2022 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jan 21, 2022 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Wanggaard and Jacque; cosponsored by Representatives Tusler, Edming, Armstrong, Callahan, Steffen, Dittrich, Petersen, Brandtjen, Tittl, Gundrum, Novak, Kurtz, Krug, Knodl, James, Plumer, Skowronski, Kuglitsch, Macco, Born, Murphy, Kitchens, Swearingen and Dallman
- Jan 21, 2022 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
- Feb 11, 2022 · Senate
Representative Wichgers added as a cosponsor
- Feb 17, 2022 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 2, 2022 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 2, 2022 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 2
- Mar 2, 2022 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 15, 2022 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1