Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session
Relating to: use of fill in commercial waterways and establishing shorelines of Great Lakes waters. (FE)
Lakes Land use planning and control Waterways and water power Waterworks
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, stopped here
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill provides for the lawful public or private use of land that has been above
the ordinary high water mark of a commercial waterway or a Great Lakes water
since December 9, 1977. Under current law, all permanent alterations, deposits, or
structures, other than boathouses, that affect navigable waters are presumed in
conformity with the law if they were constructed before December 9, 1977, and did
not require a permit at the time of construction.
Historic fill in commercial waterways
The bill applies, in part, to fill placed prior to 1977 that created land above the
ordinary high water mark of a commercial waterway, which is a specified list of rivers
and harbors. If the fill is unauthorized fill for which the Department of Natural
Resources has not initiated an enforcement action or is within an authorized
bulkhead line and not specifically restricted by a submerged land lease, the owner
of the fill may use the fill for any purpose.
Establishing the shorelines of Great Lakes waters
The bill applies, in part, to property that 1) includes land that may have been
part of the submerged bed of a Great Lakes water at the time of statehood; 2) includes
portions of land that are upland, which is defined to mean land that has been above
the ordinary high water mark since December 9, 1977; 3) is within a municipality;
and 4) is not subject to a lake bed grant or a submerged land lease and is not landward
of the statutorily established shoreline in the city of Milwaukee.
The record title holder of applicable land may submit a proposed shoreline to
to the municipality in which the land is located. The municipality must approve the
proposed shoreline if the municipality determines the proposed shoreline is in the
public interest and the proposed uses will promote the interests of the public. If a
municipality approves a proposed shoreline, the municipality must submit the
approval to DNR for review.
Following a public notice and comment period, DNR must adopt the shoreline
approved by the municipality unless DNR determines that a portion of the area
landward of the shoreline is not upland or there is not substantial evidence that the
shoreline as proposed is in the public interest. A determination by DNR establishes
the shoreline for purposes of determining the boundary of title between land held in
trust by the state and land held in fee title ownership.
The bill also prohibits the commencement of any action affecting the possession
or title of any real estate based on an assertion that the property includes portions
of land that may have at one time been submerged beneath a Great Lakes water if
the portions of land are upland and not subject to a lake bed grant or a submerged
land lease.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2
Passed 3–2 Feb 17, 2022 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2
Passed 3–2 Feb 17, 2022 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 1, 2022 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Stroebel, Ballweg, Jacque and Felzkowski; cosponsored by Representatives Wittke, Katsma, Vorpagel, Kuglitsch and Murphy
- Feb 1, 2022 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection
- Feb 8, 2022 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 14, 2022 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 16, 2022 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Stroebel
- Feb 17, 2022 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 17, 2022 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Feb 17, 2022 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Feb 17, 2022 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 18, 2022 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senators Stroebel and Cowles
- Feb 18, 2022 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-22-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 22, 2022 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 22, 2022 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 22, 2022 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 22, 2022 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 22, 2022 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 22, 2022 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 8:55 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 23, 2022 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 2, 2022 · Senate
LRB correction (Senate Substitute Amendment 1)
- Mar 2, 2022 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 14, 2022 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-14-2022
- Apr 15, 2022 · Senate
Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-15-2022
- May 17, 2022 · Senate
Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
- May 17, 2022 · Senate
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82