Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Senate Bill 900

Use of fill in commercial waterways and establishing shorelines of Great Lakes waters. (FE)

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 15, 2022. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 1, 2022

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 22, 2022

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 23, 2022

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Apr 15, 2022.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2022: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill provides for the lawful public or private use of land that has been above the ordinary high water mark of a commercial waterway or a Great Lakes water since December 9, 1977. Under current law, all permanent alterations, deposits, or structures, other than boathouses, that affect navigable waters are presumed in conformity with the law if they were constructed before December 9, 1977, and did not require a permit at the time of construction.

Historic fill in commercial waterways The bill applies, in part, to fill placed prior to 1977 that created land above the ordinary high water mark of a commercial waterway, which is a specified list of rivers and harbors. If the fill is unauthorized fill for which the Department of Natural Resources has not initiated an enforcement action or is within an authorized bulkhead line and not specifically restricted by a submerged land lease, the owner of the fill may use the fill for any purpose.

Read the full summary

Establishing the shorelines of Great Lakes waters The bill applies, in part, to property that 1) includes land that may have been part of the submerged bed of a Great Lakes water at the time of statehood; 2) includes portions of land that are upland, which is defined to mean land that has been above the ordinary high water mark since December 9, 1977; 3) is within a municipality;

and 4) is not subject to a lake bed grant or a submerged land lease and is not landward of the statutorily established shoreline in the city of Milwaukee.

The record title holder of applicable land may submit a proposed shoreline to to the municipality in which the land is located. The municipality must approve the proposed shoreline if the municipality determines the proposed shoreline is in the public interest and the proposed uses will promote the interests of the public. If a municipality approves a proposed shoreline, the municipality must submit the approval to DNR for review.

Following a public notice and comment period, DNR must adopt the shoreline approved by the municipality unless DNR determines that a portion of the area landward of the shoreline is not upland or there is not substantial evidence that the shoreline as proposed is in the public interest. A determination by DNR establishes the shoreline for purposes of determining the boundary of title between land held in trust by the state and land held in fee title ownership.

The bill also prohibits the commencement of any action affecting the possession or title of any real estate based on an assertion that the property includes portions of land that may have at one time been submerged beneath a Great Lakes water if the portions of land are upland and not subject to a lake bed grant or a submerged land lease.

Who's behind it

4 senators are its ⁠. All 4 are Republicans.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 9 names

Authors (4)

Signed on in support (5)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Government Operations vote on an amendment

Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 17, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Government Operations vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 17, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 17, 2022

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Apr 15, 2022

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Apr 14, 2022

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 23, 2022

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Feb 22, 2022

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Feb 22, 2022

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Feb 22, 2022

    The Senate passed it.

  8. Feb 22, 2022

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Feb 17, 2022

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  10. Feb 17, 2022

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  11. Feb 14, 2022

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Feb 8, 2022

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Feb 1, 2022

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection.

  14. Feb 1, 2022

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 1, 2022 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Stroebel, Ballweg, Jacque and Felzkowski; cosponsored by Representatives Wittke, Katsma, Vorpagel, Kuglitsch and Murphy

  2. Feb 1, 2022 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection

  3. Feb 8, 2022 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 14, 2022 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 16, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Stroebel

  6. Feb 17, 2022 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 17, 2022 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  8. Feb 17, 2022 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  9. Feb 17, 2022 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Feb 18, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-22-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Feb 18, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senators Stroebel and Cowles

  12. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

  14. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  16. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  17. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  19. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  20. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 8:55 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29

  21. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  25. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Feb 23, 2022 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    LRB correction (Senate Substitute Amendment 1)

  28. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  29. Apr 14, 2022 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-14-2022

  30. Apr 15, 2022 · Senate

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-15-2022

  31. May 17, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  32. May 17, 2022 · Senate

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote