Skip to content

Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session

SB 900

Vetoed Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: use of fill in commercial waterways and establishing shorelines of Great Lakes waters. (FE)

Lakes Land use planning and control Waterways and water power Waterworks

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, stopped here
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill provides for the lawful public or private use of land that has been above

the ordinary high water mark of a commercial waterway or a Great Lakes water

since December 9, 1977. Under current law, all permanent alterations, deposits, or

structures, other than boathouses, that affect navigable waters are presumed in

conformity with the law if they were constructed before December 9, 1977, and did

not require a permit at the time of construction.

Historic fill in commercial waterways

The bill applies, in part, to fill placed prior to 1977 that created land above the

ordinary high water mark of a commercial waterway, which is a specified list of rivers

and harbors. If the fill is unauthorized fill for which the Department of Natural

Resources has not initiated an enforcement action or is within an authorized

bulkhead line and not specifically restricted by a submerged land lease, the owner

of the fill may use the fill for any purpose.

Establishing the shorelines of Great Lakes waters

The bill applies, in part, to property that 1) includes land that may have been

part of the submerged bed of a Great Lakes water at the time of statehood; 2) includes

portions of land that are upland, which is defined to mean land that has been above

the ordinary high water mark since December 9, 1977; 3) is within a municipality;

and 4) is not subject to a lake bed grant or a submerged land lease and is not landward

of the statutorily established shoreline in the city of Milwaukee.

The record title holder of applicable land may submit a proposed shoreline to

to the municipality in which the land is located. The municipality must approve the

proposed shoreline if the municipality determines the proposed shoreline is in the

public interest and the proposed uses will promote the interests of the public. If a

municipality approves a proposed shoreline, the municipality must submit the

approval to DNR for review.

Following a public notice and comment period, DNR must adopt the shoreline

approved by the municipality unless DNR determines that a portion of the area

landward of the shoreline is not upland or there is not substantial evidence that the

shoreline as proposed is in the public interest. A determination by DNR establishes

the shoreline for purposes of determining the boundary of title between land held in

trust by the state and land held in fee title ownership.

The bill also prohibits the commencement of any action affecting the possession

or title of any real estate based on an assertion that the property includes portions

of land that may have at one time been submerged beneath a Great Lakes water if

the portions of land are upland and not subject to a lake bed grant or a submerged

land lease.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Ballweg (R) , Felzkowski (R) , Jacque (R) , Stroebel (R)

5 cosponsors

Katsma (R) , Kuglitsch (R) , Murphy (R) , Vorpagel (R) , Wittke (R)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2

Passed 3–2 Feb 17, 2022 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2

Passed 3–2 Feb 17, 2022 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 1, 2022 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Stroebel, Ballweg, Jacque and Felzkowski; cosponsored by Representatives Wittke, Katsma, Vorpagel, Kuglitsch and Murphy

  2. Feb 1, 2022 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection

  3. Feb 8, 2022 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 14, 2022 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 16, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Stroebel

  6. Feb 17, 2022 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 17, 2022 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  8. Feb 17, 2022 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Legal Review and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  9. Feb 17, 2022 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Feb 18, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senators Stroebel and Cowles

  11. Feb 18, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-22-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  12. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

  14. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  16. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  17. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  19. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  20. Feb 22, 2022 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 8:55 AM on 2-23-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29

  21. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  25. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Feb 23, 2022 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    LRB correction (Senate Substitute Amendment 1)

  28. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  29. Apr 14, 2022 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-14-2022

  30. Apr 15, 2022 · Senate

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-15-2022

  31. May 17, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  32. May 17, 2022 · Senate

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82