Skip to content

Bills · 2021-2022 Regular Session

SB 906

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: the amount of benefits received under the unemployment insurance law. (FE)

Unemployment insurance

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill changes the maximum number of weeks of regular unemployment

insurance (UI) benefits payable to an eligible claimant who is totally unemployed to

an amount that varies depending upon the seasonally adjusted statewide average

unemployment rate for the first or third calendar quarter immediately preceding the

beginning of the claimant's benefit year.

Currently, the maximum number of weeks of regular UI benefits payable to an

eligible claimant who is totally unemployed and who earns sufficient wages to

qualify for those benefits is fixed at 26 weeks.

SB906,2,69

Under the bill, the maximum number of weeks for claimants whose benefit

years begin during the first half of a given year is based upon the unemployment rate

for the third quarter of the preceding year, and the maximum number of weeks for

claimants whose benefit years begin during the second half of a given year is based

upon the unemployment rate for the first quarter of that year. Once a claimant

begins a benefit year, the claimant's maximum number of weeks of regular benefits

is fixed for that benefit year. Because the maximum number of weeks of state

supplemental benefits payable to a claimant is calculated in part based upon the

maximum number of weeks of regular benefits payable to a claimant, the change also

affects the maximum number of weeks of state supplemental benefits payable to a

claimant. Under the bill, the maximum number of weeks of regular benefits for total

unemployment is determined as follows:

-

See PDF for table

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Bernier (R) , Felzkowski (R) , Feyen (R) , Marklein (R) , Stroebel (R)

31 cosponsors

Allen (R) , Armstrong (R) , August (R) , Born (R) , Brandtjen (R) , Cabral-Guevara (R) , Callahan (R) , Dallman (R) , Dittrich (R) , Duchow (R) , Edming (R) , James (R) , Katsma (R) , Kitchens (R) , Knodl (R) , Krug (R) , Kuglitsch (R) , Magnafici (R) , Moses (R) , Murphy (R) , Penterman (R) , Petersen (R) , Plumer (R) , Schraa (R) , Snyder (R) , Sortwell (R) , Steffen (R) , Tusler (R) , Vorpagel (R) , Wittke (R) , Zimmerman (R)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Economic and Workforce Development, Ayes 3, Noes 2

Passed 3–2 Feb 14, 2022 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 1, 2022 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Feyen, Bernier, Felzkowski, Marklein and Stroebel; cosponsored by Representatives Dallman, Vorpagel, Wittke, Allen, Armstrong, August, Brandtjen, Cabral-Guevara, Callahan, Dittrich, Duchow, Edming, James, Katsma, Kitchens, Knodl, Krug, Kuglitsch, Magnafici, Moses, Penterman, Petersen, Plumer, Schraa, Snyder, Sortwell, Steffen, Tusler, Zimmerman and Born

  2. Feb 1, 2022 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Economic and Workforce Development

  3. Feb 3, 2022 · Senate

    Representative Murphy added as a cosponsor

  4. Feb 9, 2022 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 10, 2022 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Feb 14, 2022 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 14, 2022 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Economic and Workforce Development, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  8. Feb 14, 2022 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Mar 15, 2022 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1