Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Senate Bill 935

Certain kinds of election fraud, private resources and contracts for election administration, who may perform tasks related to election administration, defects on absentee ballot certificates, returning absentee ballots to the office of the municipal clerk, appointment of election officials, allowing an employee of a residential care facility or qualified retirement home to serve as a personal care voting assistant during a public health emergency or an incident of infectious disease, and providing a penalty. (FE)

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 11, 2022. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 3, 2022

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 19 to 14

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 56 to 38

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Apr 11, 2022.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2022: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Retirement homes and residential care facilities Personal care voting assistants Under current law, absentee voting in person inside residential care facilities and qualified retirement homes may be conducted only if the municipal clerk or board of election commissioners adopts procedures allowing voters residing in such a facility or home to apply for, receive, and complete an absentee ballot by means of special voting deputies dispatched to the facility or home for that purpose. A municipality that appoints special voting deputies must appoint at least two special voting deputies for the municipality and the deputies must be eligible voters of the county where the municipality is located. In addition, the two deputies designated to visit each qualified retirement home and residential care facility must be affiliated with different political parties whenever deputies representing different parties are available. Current law prohibits individuals employed at a residential care facility or qualified retirement home in the municipality, or any member of the individual's immediate family, from serving as a special voting deputy.

Under this bill, during a public health emergency or an incident of infectious disease that results in restricting entry to a residential care facility or qualified retirement home, the municipal clerk or board of election commissioners may appoint any individual who is employed at a residential care facility or qualified retirement home in the municipality to serve as a personal care voting assistant. A personal care voting assistant need not be an eligible voter of the county, but must be an eligible voter of this state. A personal care voting assistant must complete a two-hour online training prescribed by the Elections Commission and take the same oath of office as a special voting deputy appointed under current law. In addition, the two personal care voting assistants appointed to each facility or home must be affiliated with different political parties whenever assistants representing different parties are available. The bill also prohibits a personal care voting assistant from assisting in or facilitating the registration of any resident of a residential care facility or qualified retirement home.

Read the full summary

Under the bill, an employee of the facility or home acting as a personal care voting assistant must complete documentation, on a form prescribed by the Elections Commission, that provides the assistant's name, the name of the voter, and the type of assistance provided to the voter. The form must be separate from the absentee ballot certificate, but the information contained on the form must also be included on the absentee ballot return envelope. The administrator of the home or facility must deliver the forms to the municipal clerk or board of election commissioners and may arrange for an election official, other than a personal care voting assistant, to collect and return the absentee ballots to the clerk or board. Otherwise, all absentee ballots completed with the assistance of a personal care voting assistant must be mailed to the clerk or board.

Entry to a facility The bill prohibits residential care facilities and qualified retirement homes from denying entry to special voting deputies appointed under current law, except when the facility or home is closed to the public during a public health emergency or an incident of infectious disease. Under the bill, if a home or facility is closed to the public during such an emergency or incident, the home or facility must allow personal care voting assistants to supervise the absentee voting procedure used by occupants of the home or facility.

In addition, under the bill, no administrator of a qualified retirement home or residential care facility may deny a special voting deputy from entering the home or facility unless the governor declares a public health emergency within 60 days preceding the election for which the deputies are appointed or the Department of Health Services or the federal Centers for Medicare or Medicaid Services recommends that the family members of the occupants of a home or facility be denied access to the home or facility.

Visits to facilities Under current law, the special voting deputies must, not later than 5 p.m. on the sixth working day preceding an election, arrange with the administrator of the qualified retirement home or residential care facility one or more convenient times to visit the home or facility. The administrator of the home or facility may, upon the request of a relative of an occupant of the home or facility notify the relative of the time or times at which special voting deputies will conduct absentee voting at the home or facility. Current law also requires that the visits may be no earlier than the fourth Monday preceding the election and no later than 5 p.m. on the Monday preceding the election Under the bill, the special voting deputies must make arrangements to visit the qualified retirement homes or residential care facilities no later than 5 p.m. on the 11th working day preceding the election, and the visits may be no earlier than the fourth Monday preceding the election and no later than 5 p.m. on the sixth working day preceding the election. This bill also requires the administrator to provide notice of the dates and times when the deputies or absentee voting assistants will be assisting voters at the home or facility to the relatives for whom the home or facility has contact information.

Under current law, if an eligible voter at a residential care facility or qualified retirement home is not able to cast his or her ballot on two separate visits by special voting deputies to the home or facility, the deputies must notify the municipal clerk or board of election commissioners. The clerk or board may then send the voter an absentee ballot no later than the Friday before the election. Under the bill, if an eligible voter of a facility or home is not able to cast his or her ballot on two separate visits by the special voting deputies because access to the home or facility is restricted due to a public health emergency or incident of infectious disease, the deputies must notify the municipal clerk or board of election commissioners. The clerk or board may then send the voter an absentee ballot as provided under current law.

Penalty Finally, the bill provides that an employee of a qualified retirement home or residential care facility who coerces an occupant of the home or facility to apply for or not apply for an absentee ballot or to cast or refrain from casting a ballot or who coerces an occupant to cast a ballot for or against a particular candidate or ballot question is guilty of a Class I felony. In addition, an employee of a qualified retirement home or residential care facility who coerces an occupant of the home or facility to register or not register to vote is guilty of a Class I felony.

Use of private resources for election administration Under the bill, no official or agent of a state agency, county, city, village, or town may apply for or accept any donation or grant of moneys, equipment, materials, or personnel from an individual or nongovernmental entity for purposes of election administration, except as expressly authorized under the statutes relating to elections. Additionally, the bill provides that no official or agent of a state agency, county, city, village, or town may enter into a contract related to election administration that includes any of the following:

1. Any requirement governing election administration.

2. The transfer of any duty or power related to election administration to a person not having that duty or power under Wisconsin law.

Under the bill, whoever violates one of the prohibitions described above is guilty of a Class I felony, the penalty for which is a fine not to exceed $10,000 or imprisonment not to exceed three years and six months, or both.

The bill also makes it a Class I felony for any person to assist in counting or tabulating votes at an election unless the person is a resident of this state, is an election official who is trained to the extent provided by law, and has signed the official oath and returned it to the municipal clerk with respect to that election.

Additionally, under the bill, it is a Class I felony for any individual other than an election official or a vendor of an electronic voting system to perform any task in election administration.

Election fraud Current law prohibits election officials from committing certain kinds of election fraud, including permitting a person to register to vote or vote when the election official knows the person is not qualified to do so. The bill provides further that no election official may do any of the following:

1. Intentionally assist or cause the casting or counting of a vote or the receipt of a registration that the election official knows is invalid.

2. Intentionally assist or cause a vote or registration to be rejected when the election official knows the vote or registration is valid.

3. Intentionally fail to promptly report election fraud committed by another election official.

Under the bill, election officials violating the prohibitions described above are subject to a Class I felony.

Absentee ballot certificates Under current law, absentee ballot envelopes include a printed certificate that must be completed, signed by the voter and a qualified witness, and returned to the municipal clerk with the completed ballot so that it is delivered to the polling place no later than 8 p.m. on election day. By completing and signing the certificate, the voter certifies that he or she is entitled to vote in the election and that the voter completed his or her absentee ballot in the presence of the witness. The witness certificate includes the witness's printed name and address in addition to his or her signature. If a municipal clerk receives an absentee ballot with an improperly completed certificate or with no certificate, the clerk may, but is not required to, return the ballot to the voter whenever time permits so that the voter may correct the defect. If a certificate is missing the address of the witness, the ballot may not be counted.

Under the bill, if a municipal clerk receives an absentee ballot with an improperly completed certificate or with no certificate, in addition to being authorized to return the ballot to the elector, the clerk is required to post a notification of the defect on the voter's voter information page on the Internet site that is used by voters for original registration, currently titled MyVote Wisconsin.

Additionally, under the bill, the clerk may attempt to notify the voter of the defect by other means.

Additionally, under the bill, an absentee ballot with no certificate or with a certificate that does not include all of the following may not be counted:

1. The voter 's printed first name.

2. The voter's printed last name.

3. The voter's house or apartment number.

4. The voter's street name.

5. The voter's municipality.

6. The voter's signature.

7. The witness's printed first name.

8. The witness's printed last name.

9. The witness's house or apartment number.

10. The witness's street name.

11. The witness's municipality.

12. The witness's signature.

Finally, the bill prohibits any person other than the voter, or the witness with respect to the witness certificate, from correcting a defect in the voter's absentee ballot certificate. Whoever violates that prohibition is subject to fine not to exceed $500 or imprisonment not to exceed 30 days, or both.

Down Down /2021/related/proposals/sb935 true proposaltext /2021/related/proposals/sb935 proposaltext/2021/REG/SB935 proposaltext/2021/REG/SB935 section true Menu » 2021 » Related Documents » Proposal Text » SB935: Bill Text × Details for PDF view Link (Permanent link) Bookmark this location View toggle Go to top of document Search in this chapter Search in this section Search in this agency Search in this chapter group Search in this chapter Search in this section Cross references for section Acts affecting this section References to this 1970 Statutes Annotations Appellate Court Citations Administrative Code Index Reference lines Clear highlighting $(document).ready(function () {

$('[data-toggle=tooltip]').tooltip({ container: 'body' });

});

Who's behind it

6 senators are its ⁠. All 6 are Republicans.

17 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 23 names

Authors (6)

Signed on in support (17)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 5 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Elections vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 16, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 18, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Fiscal estimate requested from the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, by the committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 96 (1), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 21 to 12 · Feb 22, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 21, Noes 12”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 19 to 14 · Feb 22, 2022

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 56 to 38 · Feb 24, 2022 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 95 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (56)

No (38)

Didn't vote (1)

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 17, 2022

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Apr 11, 2022

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Apr 5, 2022

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 1, 2022

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Feb 24, 2022

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  6. Feb 24, 2022

    The Assembly passed it too, 56 to 38.

  7. Feb 23, 2022

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  8. Feb 23, 2022

    The Assembly received it.

  9. Feb 22, 2022

    The Senate passed it, 19 to 14.

  10. Feb 18, 2022

    “Fiscal estimate requested from the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, by the committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 96 (1), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  11. Feb 16, 2022

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  12. Feb 7, 2022

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Feb 3, 2022

    1 more representative and 1 senator signed on in support.

  14. Feb 3, 2022

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics.

  15. Feb 3, 2022

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 3, 2022 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Bernier, Cowles, Darling, Stroebel, Felzkowski and Marklein; cosponsored by Representatives Macco, Armstrong, Edming, Gundrum, Knodl, Krug, Kuglitsch, Magnafici, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, Penterman, Schraa and Spiros

  2. Feb 3, 2022 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics

  3. Feb 3, 2022 · Senate

    Representative Allen added as a cosponsor

  4. Feb 3, 2022 · Senate

    Senator Ballweg added as a coauthor

  5. Feb 7, 2022 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Feb 16, 2022 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 16, 2022 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  8. Feb 16, 2022 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Feb 18, 2022 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate requested from the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, by the committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 96 (1), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Feb 18, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-22-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senators Carpenter, Smith, Agard and Ringhand

  12. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 21, Noes 12

  14. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  16. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 19, Noes 14

  17. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  19. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  20. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 8:06 AM on 2-24-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 30

  21. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 56, Noes 38, Paired 4

  25. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Steffen added as a cosponsor

  26. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  27. Feb 24, 2022 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  28. Mar 1, 2022 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  29. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    LRB correction

  30. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  31. Apr 5, 2022 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2022 by directive of the Majority Leader

  32. Apr 11, 2022 · Senate

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-8-2022

  33. May 17, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  34. May 17, 2022 · Senate

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote