Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Senate Bill 936

The resolution of complaints filed with the Elections Commission, submitting to the legislature copies of complaints filed with the Elections Commission, reports concerning possible violations of election laws, postelection audits of electronic voting systems, printing absentee ballot applications for recounts, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 15, 2022. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 3, 2022

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 22, 2022

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 59 to 35

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Apr 15, 2022.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2022: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Formal complaints concerning election law violations Under current law, any person may file a complaint with the Elections Commission alleging a violation of election laws by a voter or an election official. The commission may only initiate an investigation of an alleged violation of election laws based on a sworn complaint filed with the commission. Neither the commission nor the members or employees of the commission, including the administrator, may file a sworn complaint for purposes of initiating an investigation. In addition, current law authorizes any eligible voter to file a complaint with the commission requesting the commission to compel an election official to conform his or her conduct to the law or to restrain the official from taking any action inconsistent with the law. Current law also authorizes a person to file a complaint with the commission indicating that the person believes a violation of the federal Help America Vote Act regarding an election for a national office in this state occurred, is occurring, or is proposed to occur.

Current law prohibits public access to records obtained or prepared by the Elections Commission in connection with an investigation, including the full text of any complaint filed with the commission, with certain exceptions. For example, the commission must provide such records to the Joint Committee on Finance in order to receive supplemental funds for an ongoing investigation. In addition, the commission must provide investigatory records to the Legislative Audit Bureau to the extent necessary for the bureau to carry out its duties.

Read the full summary

This bill requires that the Elections Commission resolve each complaint filed with the commission no later than 60 days after receiving the complaint unless the commission, by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the members, approves extending that time by an additional 60-day period. The bill allows the commission to adopt more than one 60-day extension. Under the bill, during the 60-day period and any extension of that period, the commission must determine, by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the members, whether to dismiss the complaint; initiate an investigation; or grant the relief, in whole or in part, requested by the complainant.

If the commission fails to dismiss a complaint, the commission must initiate an investigation or refer the matter to the attorney general or to a district attorney.

Finally, under the bill, a person who alleges that an action of the commission violated or resulted in the violation of election laws may file a complaint and commence suit in the circuit court for any county where the alleged violation occurred.

The bill also requires the Elections Commission to provide a copy of the full text of any complaint received by the commission, along with documentation specifying how the complaint was resolved, to the representative of the assembly of the assembly district and the senator of the senate district where the violation alleged in the complaint occurred, is occurring, or is proposed to occur and to the cochairpersons of the legislative standing committees with jurisdiction over elections no later than 30 days after the complaint was resolved. The bill requires the commission to redact the names of individuals from the complaints and documentation so provided.

Reports concerning election law violations This bill requires the Elections Commission to submit to the legislature and the governor no later than January 31 each year a report that includes all of the following:

1. The number of formal complaints filed with the commission in the previous year, a description of each complaint, and a description of all actions the commission took to address the complaint.

2. The total number of investigations the commission conducted in the previous year and a description of the nature of each investigation.

3. The number of informal reports of possible violations of election laws, including violations of election laws or other misconduct alleged to have been committed by election officials, that the commission received the previous year, including reports received on the toll-free hotline current law requires the commission to maintain for voters to report possible violations of election laws. The commission's report must include a description of each general category of concerns reported to the commission and an explanation of each such category.

The bill additionally requires the Elections Commission to promulgate rules establishing procedures for the commission's consideration and handling of both formal complaints and informal reports of possible violations of election laws, including violations of election laws or other misconduct alleged to have been committed by election officials.

Postelection audits of electronic voting systems Under current law, after each general election, the Elections Commission is required to perform an audit of electronic voting systems used in the election and take remedial actions if the audit yields an error rate exceeding that which is permitted under standards established by the Federal Election Commission.

Under the bill, each such audit must be completed no later than November 30 after each general election and must include all of the following:

1. Electronic voting system equipment used in at least four reporting units in the city of Milwaukee, at least four reporting units in the city of Madison, at least one reporting unit in each of the 20 other largest municipalities in Wisconsin, and at least 5 percent of the reporting units in all other municipalities combined.

2. At least one piece of electronic voting system equipment used in each county in the state.

3. At least five reporting units that used each type of electronic voting system approved for use in the state.

The bill also requires the Elections Commission to promulgate rules that do all of the following:

1. Establish an error rate for purposes of the postelection audits. The bill eliminates the requirement that the error rate not exceed that permitted under standards established by the Federal Election Commission.

2. Establish a process for the postelection audits that provides for the random selection of reporting units and that, except with respect to audits conducted in the cities of Milwaukee and Madison and the 20 other largest municipalities in Wisconsin, as specified above, ensures reporting units are selected for audit from geographic areas throughout Wisconsin.

Finally, the bill requires the Legislative Audit Bureau to analyze the postelection audits conducted after each general election and make recommendations to the legislature for improving the audit process and for improving the accuracy of voting systems, if it determines that improvements are needed. The bill requires LAB to submit its report no later than the January 15 following each general election. Under current law, the chairperson of the Elections Commission, or the chairperson's designee, is required to canvass and certify the results of the general election on or before December 1 following election.

Printing absentee ballot applications for recounts Under this bill, in the event of a recount, the municipal clerk is required to print and make available for purposes of the recount paper copies of all absentee ballot applications received electronically for the election.

Who's behind it

7 senators are its ⁠. All 7 are Republicans.

16 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 23 names

Authors (7)

Signed on in support (16)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Elections vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 9, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 21 to 12 · Feb 22, 2022

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 59 to 35 · Feb 24, 2022 · 3 didn't vote

See how each of the 97 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (59)

Didn't vote (3)

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 17, 2022

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Apr 15, 2022

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Apr 14, 2022

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 24, 2022

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  5. Feb 24, 2022

    The Assembly passed it too, 59 to 35.

  6. Feb 23, 2022

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Feb 23, 2022

    The Assembly received it.

  8. Feb 22, 2022

    The Senate passed it, 21 to 12.

  9. Feb 22, 2022

    The Senate adopted it.

  10. Feb 10, 2022

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Feb 9, 2022

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  12. Feb 7, 2022

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Feb 3, 2022

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  14. Feb 3, 2022

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics.

  15. Feb 3, 2022

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 3, 2022 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Bernier, Cowles, Darling, Stroebel, Felzkowski, Marklein and Wanggaard; cosponsored by Representatives Macco, Armstrong, Edming, Gundrum, Knodl, Krug, Kuglitsch, Magnafici, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, Penterman, Schraa and Spiros

  2. Feb 3, 2022 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics

  3. Feb 3, 2022 · Senate

    Senator Ballweg added as a coauthor

  4. Feb 7, 2022 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 9, 2022 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 9, 2022 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  7. Feb 9, 2022 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Feb 10, 2022 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Feb 18, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-22-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  10. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Bernier

  11. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  13. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  15. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 12

  16. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  19. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 8:07 AM on 2-24-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 30

  20. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  21. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  23. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 59, Noes 35, Paired 2

  24. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Steffen added as a cosponsor

  25. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Feb 24, 2022 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  28. Apr 14, 2022 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-14-2022

  29. Apr 15, 2022 · Senate

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-15-2022

  30. May 17, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  31. May 17, 2022 · Senate

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote