Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Senate Bill 937

Status as an indefinitely confined voter for purposes of receiving absentee ballots automatically and providing a penalty

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 11, 2022. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 3, 2022

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 22, 2022

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 55 to 39

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Apr 11, 2022.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2022: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law allows a voter who is indefinitely confined because of age, physical illness, infirmity, or disability to have, by signing a statement to that effect, an absentee ballot sent to the voter automatically every election. The voter is not required to submit a copy of his or her voter identification with the request to receive absentee ballots automatically. Current law requires the voter to notify the municipal clerk when the voter is no longer indefinitely confined. Also, under current law, if a voter fails to vote an absentee ballot the voter receives as a result of his or her indefinitely confined status, the voter must renew his or her application for indefinitely confined status within 30 days or be removed from the indefinitely confined status list. Finally, the municipal clerk must remove a voter from the indefinitely confined status list upon the voter's request or upon receipt of reliable information that the voter no longer qualifies as indefinitely confined.

This bill does all of the following:

Read the full summary

1. Provides that indefinitely confined status may be claimed by a voter who is indefinitely confined and cannot travel independently without significant burden because of frailty, physical illness, or a disability that will last longer than one year.

2. Provides that a voter seeking indefinitely confined status must apply for that status on an application prescribed by the Elections Commission. Under the bill, the application form prescribed by the commission must be separate and distinct from any other absentee ballot application prescribed by the commission.

3. Subject to certain exceptions provided in the bill, requires that an applicant for indefinitely confined status submit proof of identification with his or her application.

4. Specifies that the existence of an outbreak or epidemic of a communicable disease in a voter's community does not qualify the voter as indefinitely confined.

5. Specifies that the penalty for making a false statement for the purpose of qualifying as indefinitely confined is a fine of not more than $1,000 or imprisonment of not more than six months, or both.

6. Provides that a voter who fails to vote a ballot the voter receives as a result of his or her indefinitely confined status may be removed from the indefinitely confined status list only if he or she fails to vote the ballot at the spring or general election.

7. Requires that the municipal clerk remove a voter from the indefinitely confined status list if the voter votes at the polls in any election.

8. Requires the Elections Commission to facilitate the removal of the indefinitely confined status of each voter who received that status between March 12, 2020, and November 3, 2020. A voter whose indefinitely confined status is so removed must submit a new application for indefinitely confined status in order to continue receiving absentee ballots automatically.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report.

Who's behind it

5 senators are its ⁠. All 5 are Republicans.

20 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 25 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (20)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Elections vote on an amendment

Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 16, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Elections vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 16, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 18 to 15 · Feb 22, 2022

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 55 to 39 · Feb 24, 2022 · 3 didn't vote

See how each of the 97 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (55)

No (39)

Didn't vote (3)

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 17, 2022

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Apr 11, 2022

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Apr 5, 2022

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 24, 2022

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  5. Feb 24, 2022

    The Assembly passed it too, 55 to 39.

  6. Feb 23, 2022

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Feb 23, 2022

    The Assembly received it.

  8. Feb 22, 2022

    The Senate passed it, 18 to 15.

  9. Feb 22, 2022

    The Senate adopted it.

  10. Feb 16, 2022

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  11. Feb 16, 2022

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  12. Feb 7, 2022

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Feb 3, 2022

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  14. Feb 3, 2022

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics.

  15. Feb 3, 2022

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 3, 2022 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Bernier, Darling, Felzkowski, Marklein and Wanggaard; cosponsored by Representatives Duchow, Allen, Armstrong, Dallman, Edming, Gundrum, Knodl, Krug, Kuglitsch, Macco, Magnafici, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, Penterman, Pronschinske, Schraa and Spiros

  2. Feb 3, 2022 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics

  3. Feb 3, 2022 · Senate

    Senator Ballweg added as a coauthor

  4. Feb 7, 2022 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 15, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Bernier

  6. Feb 16, 2022 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 16, 2022 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  8. Feb 16, 2022 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  9. Feb 16, 2022 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Feb 18, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Bernier

  11. Feb 18, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-22-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  12. Feb 18, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 3 offered by Senator Bernier

  13. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Read a second time

  14. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  15. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 adopted

  16. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 3 adopted

  17. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  19. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  20. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  22. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  23. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 8:08 AM on 2-24-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 30

  24. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  25. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  26. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  27. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 55, Noes 39, Paired 2

  28. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Representative Steffen added as a cosponsor

  29. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  30. Feb 24, 2022 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  31. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    LRB correction (Senate Amendment 1)

  32. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    LRB correction (Senate Amendment 2)

  33. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  34. Apr 5, 2022 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2022 by directive of the Majority Leader

  35. Apr 11, 2022 · Senate

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-8-2022

  36. May 17, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  37. May 17, 2022 · Senate

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote