Skip to content
Bills from the 2021–22 session

Senate Bill 941

Overseeing the administration of elections. (FE)

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 11, 2022. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 3, 2022

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 21 to 12

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 58 to 32

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Apr 11, 2022.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2022: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill make a number of changes to current law regarding the oversight of elections in this state.

Federal funds The governor is authorized under current law to accept funds from the federal government and to designate the state agency that will receive the funds. Generally, a designated state agency must expend the funds consistent with federal requirements for accepting and spending the funds. Under the bill, before the governor may disburse federal funds to the Elections Commission, the commission must submit a plan for use of the funds to the Joint Committee on Finance. If the committee does not schedule a meeting to review the plan within 14 days of receiving the plan from the commission, the commission may implement the plan and the governor may disburse the funds. If the committee schedules a meeting to review the plan within 14 days of receiving the plan from the commission, the commission may not implement the plan, and the governor may not disburse the funds, without the committee's approval.

Read the full summary

Federal election guidance The bill requires state agencies to submit federal election guidance, and communications from the federal government or the Department of Justice related to that guidance, to the senate majority leader, the senate minority leader, the speaker of the assembly, the assembly minority leader, the chairpersons of the standing committees with jurisdiction concerning elections, and the cochairpersons of the Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules no later than 48 hours after receiving the guidance or communication. Under the bill, a state agency make not take any action to implement federal election guidance without the approval of JCRAR, except that if JCRAR does not schedule a meeting to review the guidance within 30 days of receiving the it, the state agency may implement the guidance.

The bill defines “federal election guidance” as any directive or guidance issued by the federal department of justice or any other executive branch agency of the federal government pertaining to elections, including the times, places, and manner for administering elections in this state.

Registration and voting statistics Under current law, no later than 30 days after an election, each municipal clerk must submit a report to the Elections Commission and to the county clerk of the county where the municipality is located that provides certain registration and voting statistics. The report must provide the number of voters who voted in the election; the number of voters who registered before election day; the number of voters who registered on election day; the number of voters who voted by absentee ballot; and, generally, the results of the postelection audit to verify election day registrations.

Under the bill, the report that the municipal clerk submits to the commission and the county clerk after each election must also include the following:

1. The total number of registered voters residing in the municipality on the day of the election 2. The total number of voters who registered to vote beginning on the day of the immediately preceding election and ending on the day of the most recent election.

3. The total number of voters voting absentee ballots by mail and the total number of voters voting absentee ballots in person.

4. The total number absentee ballots returned by voters that were not counted and the reasons for why such ballots were not counted.

5. The total number of voters casting ballots at the polling place.

6. The total number of voters casting provisional ballots and the number of such ballots they were ultimately not counted.

7. The total number of defective ballots that election officials recreated, with a separate itemization of such ballots cast by military and oversea electors, damaged ballots, and ballots recreated for other reasons.

8. The location of each residential care facility and qualified retirement home to which the municipality dispatched special voting deputies and the total number of ballots cast by residents of the facilities and homes using special voting deputies.

9. The number of voters whose personally identifiable information on the official registration list did not match the personally identifiable information maintained by the Department of Transportation beginning on the day of the immediately preceding election and ending on the day of the most recent election; a description of each mismatch; and the number of such voters whose registration status was changed from eligible to ineligible.

The bill also requires that, no later than 30 days after each election at which a state or national office is filled, each county clerk submit to the Elections Commission a report that indicates the number of ballots that the county clerk ordered for each municipality and distributed to each municipality for the election;

the number of ballots ultimately cast in that election; the number of ballots rejected and the reasons for rejection; the number of unused ballots; any other action that the county performed to reconcile the total number of ballots with the number of votes cast; and an explanation of any discrepancy between the number of ballots ordered and the number distributed and of any discrepancy between the number of ballots distributed and the number cast or rejected.

Under the bill, within seven days after receiving a report from a municipal clerk under current law or from a county clerk under the bill, the Elections Commission must publish the report on the commission's Internet site in a format that is easily accessible to the public. In addition, the commission must submit each county clerk's report to the legislature and the Legislative Audit Bureau within seven days after receiving the report. Under the bill, LAB reviews the report and, within 30 days after receiving the report, submits a report to the legislature with its findings and recommendations, including a description of any discrepancies it found and any explanation of those discrepancies it received from local election officials.

Elections Commission legal counsel Current law requires that all employees of the Elections Commission be nonpartisan. This bill requires that legal counsel for the commission be partisan.

Under the bill, the legislative leadership of one of the two major political parties that received the largest number of votes for president at the most recent presidential election appoints one individual to serve as legal counsel and the legislative leadership of the other such political party appoints one individual to serve as legal counsel.

Archived copy of the registration list Under the bill, on the first day of each month, the Elections Commission must archive an electronic copy of the official registration list as it appeared for the previous month and retain that copy for no less than 22 months.

Who's behind it

3 senators are its ⁠. All 3 are Republicans.

24 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 27 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (24)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 5 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Elections vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 9, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 21 to 12 · Feb 22, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 21, Noes 12”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 21 to 12 · Feb 22, 2022

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 58 to 32 · Feb 24, 2022 · 5 didn't vote

See how each of the 95 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (58)

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 58 to 32 · Feb 24, 2022

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 32”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 17, 2022

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Apr 11, 2022

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Apr 5, 2022

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 24, 2022

    The Assembly passed it too, 58 to 32.

  5. Feb 23, 2022

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Feb 23, 2022

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Feb 22, 2022

    The Senate passed it, 21 to 12.

  8. Feb 16, 2022

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. Feb 9, 2022

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  10. Feb 8, 2022

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  11. Feb 7, 2022

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Feb 3, 2022 to Feb 7, 2022

    2 more senators signed on in support.

  13. Feb 3, 2022

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics.

  14. Feb 3, 2022

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 3, 2022 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators LeMahieu, Darling and Stroebel; cosponsored by Representatives Vos, Armstrong, Behnke, Cabral-Guevara, Dallman, Dittrich, Gundrum, Katsma, Knodl, Krug, Kuglitsch, Magnafici, Murphy, Mursau, Penterman, Plumer, Rozar, Sanfelippo, Steffen, Tusler and Wittke

  2. Feb 3, 2022 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics

  3. Feb 3, 2022 · Senate

    Senator Felzkowski added as a coauthor

  4. Feb 7, 2022 · Senate

    Senator Ballweg added as a coauthor

  5. Feb 7, 2022 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Feb 8, 2022 · Senate

    Representative Schraa added as a cosponsor

  7. Feb 9, 2022 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Feb 9, 2022 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  9. Feb 9, 2022 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Feb 16, 2022 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Feb 18, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-22-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  12. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senators Carpenter, Smith and Ringhand

  13. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Read a second time

  14. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 21, Noes 12

  15. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  17. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 12

  18. Feb 22, 2022 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  20. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  21. Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 8:12 AM on 2-24-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 30

  22. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  23. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Spreitzer, Vruwink, Ohnstad, Hebl, Cabrera, Considine, Andraca, Snodgrass, Shelton, Hong, Conley, Brostoff, Subeck, S. Rodriguez, Haywood, Vining, Shankland, Hesselbein, Baldeh, Doyle, B. Meyers, Anderson, Neubauer, Riemer, Pope, Hintz, Ortiz-Velez and Emerson

  24. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 32

  25. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  26. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  27. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 58, Noes 32, Paired 4

  28. Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. Feb 24, 2022 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  30. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    LRB correction

  31. Mar 2, 2022 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  32. Apr 5, 2022 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2022 by directive of the Majority Leader

  33. Apr 11, 2022 · Senate

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-8-2022

  34. May 17, 2022 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  35. May 17, 2022 · Senate

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote