Senate Bill 941
Overseeing the administration of elections. (FE)
Vetoed by the governor
Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 11, 2022. Lawmakers did not , so it stands.
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 3, 2022
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed 21 to 12
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 58 to 32
-
Governor, stopped here
Vetoed Apr 11, 2022.
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2022: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill make a number of changes to current law regarding the oversight of elections in this state.
Federal funds The governor is authorized under current law to accept funds from the federal government and to designate the state agency that will receive the funds. Generally, a designated state agency must expend the funds consistent with federal requirements for accepting and spending the funds. Under the bill, before the governor may disburse federal funds to the Elections Commission, the commission must submit a plan for use of the funds to the Joint Committee on Finance. If the committee does not schedule a meeting to review the plan within 14 days of receiving the plan from the commission, the commission may implement the plan and the governor may disburse the funds. If the committee schedules a meeting to review the plan within 14 days of receiving the plan from the commission, the commission may not implement the plan, and the governor may not disburse the funds, without the committee's approval.
Read the full summary Show less
Federal election guidance The bill requires state agencies to submit federal election guidance, and communications from the federal government or the Department of Justice related to that guidance, to the senate majority leader, the senate minority leader, the speaker of the assembly, the assembly minority leader, the chairpersons of the standing committees with jurisdiction concerning elections, and the cochairpersons of the Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules no later than 48 hours after receiving the guidance or communication. Under the bill, a state agency make not take any action to implement federal election guidance without the approval of JCRAR, except that if JCRAR does not schedule a meeting to review the guidance within 30 days of receiving the it, the state agency may implement the guidance.
The bill defines “federal election guidance” as any directive or guidance issued by the federal department of justice or any other executive branch agency of the federal government pertaining to elections, including the times, places, and manner for administering elections in this state.
Registration and voting statistics Under current law, no later than 30 days after an election, each municipal clerk must submit a report to the Elections Commission and to the county clerk of the county where the municipality is located that provides certain registration and voting statistics. The report must provide the number of voters who voted in the election; the number of voters who registered before election day; the number of voters who registered on election day; the number of voters who voted by absentee ballot; and, generally, the results of the postelection audit to verify election day registrations.
Under the bill, the report that the municipal clerk submits to the commission and the county clerk after each election must also include the following:
1. The total number of registered voters residing in the municipality on the day of the election 2. The total number of voters who registered to vote beginning on the day of the immediately preceding election and ending on the day of the most recent election.
3. The total number of voters voting absentee ballots by mail and the total number of voters voting absentee ballots in person.
4. The total number absentee ballots returned by voters that were not counted and the reasons for why such ballots were not counted.
5. The total number of voters casting ballots at the polling place.
6. The total number of voters casting provisional ballots and the number of such ballots they were ultimately not counted.
7. The total number of defective ballots that election officials recreated, with a separate itemization of such ballots cast by military and oversea electors, damaged ballots, and ballots recreated for other reasons.
8. The location of each residential care facility and qualified retirement home to which the municipality dispatched special voting deputies and the total number of ballots cast by residents of the facilities and homes using special voting deputies.
9. The number of voters whose personally identifiable information on the official registration list did not match the personally identifiable information maintained by the Department of Transportation beginning on the day of the immediately preceding election and ending on the day of the most recent election; a description of each mismatch; and the number of such voters whose registration status was changed from eligible to ineligible.
The bill also requires that, no later than 30 days after each election at which a state or national office is filled, each county clerk submit to the Elections Commission a report that indicates the number of ballots that the county clerk ordered for each municipality and distributed to each municipality for the election;
the number of ballots ultimately cast in that election; the number of ballots rejected and the reasons for rejection; the number of unused ballots; any other action that the county performed to reconcile the total number of ballots with the number of votes cast; and an explanation of any discrepancy between the number of ballots ordered and the number distributed and of any discrepancy between the number of ballots distributed and the number cast or rejected.
Under the bill, within seven days after receiving a report from a municipal clerk under current law or from a county clerk under the bill, the Elections Commission must publish the report on the commission's Internet site in a format that is easily accessible to the public. In addition, the commission must submit each county clerk's report to the legislature and the Legislative Audit Bureau within seven days after receiving the report. Under the bill, LAB reviews the report and, within 30 days after receiving the report, submits a report to the legislature with its findings and recommendations, including a description of any discrepancies it found and any explanation of those discrepancies it received from local election officials.
Elections Commission legal counsel Current law requires that all employees of the Elections Commission be nonpartisan. This bill requires that legal counsel for the commission be partisan.
Under the bill, the legislative leadership of one of the two major political parties that received the largest number of votes for president at the most recent presidential election appoints one individual to serve as legal counsel and the legislative leadership of the other such political party appoints one individual to serve as legal counsel.
Archived copy of the registration list Under the bill, on the first day of each month, the Elections Commission must archive an electronic copy of the official registration list as it appeared for the previous month and retain that copy for no less than 22 months.
Who's behind it
3 senators are its . All 3 are Republicans.
24 more lawmakers .
See all 27 names Hide the names
Authors (3)
- Alberta Darling · Republican, Senate
- Devin LeMahieu · Republican, Senate
- Duey Stroebel · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (24)
- Dave Armstrong · Republican, Assembly
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Elijah Behnke · Republican, Assembly
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara · Republican, Senate
- Alex Dallman · Republican, Assembly
- Barbara Dittrich · Republican, Assembly
- Mary Felzkowski · Republican, Senate
- Rick Gundrum · Republican, Assembly
- Terry Katsma · Republican, Assembly
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Krug · Republican, Assembly
- Mike Kuglitsch · Republican, Assembly
- Gae Magnafici · Republican, Assembly
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- Will Penterman · Republican, Assembly
- Jon Plumer · Republican, Assembly
- Donna Rozar · Republican, Assembly
- Joe Sanfelippo · Republican, Assembly
- Michael Schraa · Republican, Assembly
- David Steffen · Republican, Assembly
- Ron Tusler · Republican, Assembly
- Robin Vos · Republican, Assembly
- Bob Wittke · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 5 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Elections vote to recommend it
Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 9, 2022
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 21 to 12 · Feb 22, 2022
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 21, Noes 12”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 21 to 12 · Feb 22, 2022
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (21)
- Alberta Darling (R, 8)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Dale Kooyenga (R, 5)
- Dan Feyen (R, 20)
- Devin LeMahieu (R, 9)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Eric Wimberger (R, 2)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Jerry Petrowski (R, 29)
- Joan Ballweg (R, 14)
- John Jagler (R, 13)
- Julian Bradley (R, 28)
- Kathleen Bernier (R, 23)
- Mary Felzkowski (R, 12)
- Patrick Testin (R, 24)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Rob Stafsholt (R, 10)
- Roger Roth (R, 19)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
No (12)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Brad Pfaff (D, 32)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Janet Bewley (D, 25)
- Janis Ringhand (D, 15)
- Jeff Smith (D, 31)
- Jon Erpenbach (D, 27)
- Kelda Roys (D, 26)
- LaTonya Johnson (D, 6)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Melissa Agard (D, 16)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 58 to 32 · Feb 24, 2022 · 5 didn't vote
See how each of the 95 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (58)
- Adam Neylon (R, 15)
- Alex Dallman (R, 39)
- Amy Loudenbeck (R, 31)
- Barbara Dittrich (R, 99)
- Calvin Callahan (R, 35)
- Chuck Wichgers (R, 84)
- Cindi Duchow (R, 97)
- Clint Moses (R, 92)
- Cody Horlacher (R, 33)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Dave Armstrong (R, 67)
- Dave Murphy (R, 56)
- David Steffen (R, 4)
- Donna Rozar (R, 69)
- Elijah Behnke (R, 6)
- Gae Magnafici (R, 28)
- Gary Tauchen (R, 6)
- James Edming (R, 87)
- Janel Brandtjen (R, 22)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt (R, 52)
- Jesse James (R, 23)
- Jessie Rodriguez (R, 21)
- Jim Steineke (R, 5)
- Joe Sanfelippo (R, 15)
- Joel Kitchens (R, 1)
- John Macco (R, 88)
- John Spiros (R, 86)
- Jon Plumer (R, 42)
- Ken Skowronski (R, 82)
- Kevin Petersen (R, 57)
- Loren Oldenburg (R, 96)
- Mark Born (R, 37)
- Michael Schraa (R, 53)
- Mike Kuglitsch (R, 84)
- Nancy VanderMeer (R, 70)
- Pat Snyder (R, 85)
- Paul Tittl (R, 25)
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara (R, 19)
- Rick Gundrum (R, 58)
- Rob Brooks (R, 59)
- Rob Summerfield (R, 68)
- Rob Swearingen (R, 34)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Ron Tusler (R, 3)
- Samantha Kerkman (R, 61)
- Scott Allen (R, 82)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Shae Sortwell (R, 2)
- Shannon Zimmerman (R, 30)
- Terry Katsma (R, 26)
- Todd Novak (R, 51)
- Tony Kurtz (R, 41)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
- Treig Pronschinske (R, 29)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
- Tyler Vorpagel (R, 27)
- Warren Petryk (R, 93)
No (32)
- Beth Meyers (D, 74)
- Daniel Riemer (D, 7)
- Dave Considine (D, 81)
- David Bowen (D, 10)
- Deb Andraca (D, 23)
- Dianne Hesselbein (D, 27)
- Dora Drake (D, 4)
- Evan Goyke (D, 18)
- Francesca Hong (D, 76)
- Gary Hebl (D, 46)
- Gordon Hintz (D, 54)
- Greta Neubauer (D, 66)
- Jill Billings (D, 95)
- Jimmy Anderson (D, 47)
- Jodi Emerson (D, 91)
- Jonathan Brostoff (D, 19)
- Kalan Haywood (D, 16)
- Kristina Shelton (D, 90)
- LaKeshia Myers (D, 12)
- Lee Snodgrass (D, 52)
- Lisa Subeck (D, 79)
- Mark Spreitzer (D, 15)
- Nick Milroy (D, 73)
- Robyn Vining (D, 13)
- Samba Baldeh (D, 48)
- Sara Rodriguez (D, 13)
- Shelia Stubbs (D, 78)
- Sondy Pope (D, 80)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
- Sue Conley (D, 44)
- Tip McGuire (D, 64)
- Tod Ohnstad (D, 65)
Didn't vote (5)
- Don Vruwink (D, 43)
- Marisabel Cabrera (D, 9)
- Supreme Moore Omokunde (D, 17)
- Sylvia Ortiz-Velez (D, 8)
- Timothy Ramthun (R, 59)
Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 58 to 32 · Feb 24, 2022
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 32”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 17, 2022
The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.
-
Apr 11, 2022
The governor vetoed it.
-
Apr 5, 2022
Sent to the governor.
-
Feb 24, 2022
The Assembly passed it too, 58 to 32.
-
Feb 23, 2022
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 23, 2022
The Assembly received it.
-
Feb 22, 2022
The Senate passed it, 21 to 12.
-
Feb 16, 2022
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 9, 2022
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.
-
Feb 8, 2022
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Feb 7, 2022
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 3, 2022 to Feb 7, 2022
2 more senators signed on in support.
-
Feb 3, 2022
Sent to the Senate Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics.
-
Feb 3, 2022
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 3, 2022 · Senate
Introduced by Senators LeMahieu, Darling and Stroebel; cosponsored by Representatives Vos, Armstrong, Behnke, Cabral-Guevara, Dallman, Dittrich, Gundrum, Katsma, Knodl, Krug, Kuglitsch, Magnafici, Murphy, Mursau, Penterman, Plumer, Rozar, Sanfelippo, Steffen, Tusler and Wittke
- Feb 3, 2022 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics
- Feb 3, 2022 · Senate
Senator Felzkowski added as a coauthor
- Feb 7, 2022 · Senate
Senator Ballweg added as a coauthor
- Feb 7, 2022 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 8, 2022 · Senate
Representative Schraa added as a cosponsor
- Feb 9, 2022 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 9, 2022 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Feb 9, 2022 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 16, 2022 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 18, 2022 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-22-2022 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 22, 2022 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senators Carpenter, Smith and Ringhand
- Feb 22, 2022 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 22, 2022 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 21, Noes 12
- Feb 22, 2022 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 22, 2022 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 22, 2022 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 12
- Feb 22, 2022 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 23, 2022 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 8:12 AM on 2-24-2022 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 30
- Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Spreitzer, Vruwink, Ohnstad, Hebl, Cabrera, Considine, Andraca, Snodgrass, Shelton, Hong, Conley, Brostoff, Subeck, S. Rodriguez, Haywood, Vining, Shankland, Hesselbein, Baldeh, Doyle, B. Meyers, Anderson, Neubauer, Riemer, Pope, Hintz, Ortiz-Velez and Emerson
- Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 32
- Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 58, Noes 32, Paired 4
- Feb 24, 2022 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 24, 2022 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 2, 2022 · Senate
LRB correction
- Mar 2, 2022 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 5, 2022 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2022 by directive of the Majority Leader
- Apr 11, 2022 · Senate
Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-8-2022
- May 17, 2022 · Senate
Placed on calendar 5-17-2022 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
- May 17, 2022 · Senate
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
Terms on this page
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote