Skip to content
Bills from the 2023–24 session

Assembly Bill 1065

Prohibiting University of Wisconsin System institutions and technical colleges from using loyalty pledges and requiring them to make certain information publicly available

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Mar 29, 2024. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 2, 2024

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 22, 2024

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 22 to 10

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Mar 29, 2024.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 15, 2024: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill prohibits University of Wisconsin System institutions and technical colleges from conditioning student admission, conditioning the recognition or funding of student organizations, or conditioning faculty hiring, reappointment, annual review, performance review, or promotion on a person's or student organization's pledging allegiance to or making a statement of personal support for or opposition to any political ideology or movement, including a pledge or statement regarding diversity, equity, inclusion, or related topics (loyalty pledge). This prohibition also applies to an institutional review board associated with the UW System institution or technical college, which may not condition research approval for a researcher on a loyalty pledge. The bill also prohibits each UW System institution and technical college from requesting or requiring such a loyalty pledge or, if the institution or technical college receives such a loyalty pledge, from taking action on the basis of the viewpoints expressed in it. The bill provides a private right of action allowing an applicant for admission, student, student organization, faculty member, or prospective faculty member to bring a civil action for a violation against the UW System institution or technical college or its employees whose actions caused or contributed to the violation. The plaintiff may seek injunctive relief and damages in court and, if successful, is entitled to reasonable attorney fees. The bill specifies certain examples of injunctive relief available to plaintiffs, including admission as a student, rehiring, or promotion to tenure. An employee of a UW System institution or technical college whose actions caused a violation must be placed on unpaid leave for the following academic year, except the employee must be terminated if the employee caused a prior violation within the preceding five years. The bill also allows the attorney general to file an injunction action against a violating UW System institution or technical college.

The bill requires each UW System institution and technical college to post and make publicly available on its website all training materials used for students, faculty, and staff, and all policies and guidance, on all matters of nondiscrimination, diversity, equity, inclusion, race, ethnicity, sex, or bias.

Who's behind it

9 representatives are its ⁠. All 9 are Republicans.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 10 names

Authors (9)

Signed on in support (1)

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities vote to recommend it

Passed, 10 to 4 · Feb 14, 2024

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 10, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Universities and Revenue vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 3 · Mar 8, 2024

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Universities and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 22 to 10 · Mar 12, 2024

See how each of the 32 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 15, 2024

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Mar 29, 2024

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Mar 26, 2024

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 12, 2024

    The Senate passed it too, 22 to 10.

  5. Mar 8, 2024

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 3.

  6. Mar 6, 2024

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Feb 26, 2024

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Universities and Revenue.

  8. Feb 23, 2024

    The Senate received it.

  9. Feb 22, 2024

    The Assembly passed it.

  10. Feb 14, 2024

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  11. Feb 14, 2024

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 4.

  12. Feb 6, 2024

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Feb 2, 2024

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities.

  14. Feb 2, 2024

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 2, 2024 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Moses, Murphy, Nedweski, Callahan, O'Connor, Brandtjen, Dittrich, Green and Maxey; cosponsored by Senator Nass

  2. Feb 2, 2024 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Colleges and Universities

  3. Feb 6, 2024 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 8, 2024 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Feb 14, 2024 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 10, Noes 4

  6. Feb 14, 2024 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. Feb 20, 2024 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 10:57 AM on 2-22-2024 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 28

  8. Feb 22, 2024 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  9. Feb 22, 2024 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  10. Feb 22, 2024 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  11. Feb 22, 2024 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  12. Feb 22, 2024 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  13. Feb 23, 2024 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  14. Feb 26, 2024 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Universities and Revenue

  15. Mar 6, 2024 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  16. Mar 7, 2024 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  17. Mar 8, 2024 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Universities and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  18. Mar 8, 2024 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  19. Mar 11, 2024 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-12-2024 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  20. Mar 12, 2024 · Senate

    Read a second time

  21. Mar 12, 2024 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Mar 12, 2024 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  23. Mar 12, 2024 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 22, Noes 10

  24. Mar 12, 2024 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Mar 12, 2024 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  26. Mar 19, 2024 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-19-2024

  27. Mar 26, 2024 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 3-26-2024

  28. Mar 29, 2024 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-29-2024

  29. May 14, 2024 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-14-2024 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  30. May 15, 2024 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote