School district boundary adjustments for lots in newly created subdivisions and requiring school district boundary mapping that is compatible with the statewide digital map. (FE)

What it would have done

Summary by the Legislative Reference Bureau, the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law requires that various state agencies annually submit to the Department of Administration a plan to integrate land information so that the information is readily available for use by any state, local governmental unit, or public utility. Under current law, DOA must receive the land information integration plans by March 31 of each year. Under the bill, the Department of Public Instruction is also required to annually provide a land information integration plan.

The bill requires the land information officer of each county to annually submit to DPI a digital mapping file of the boundaries of each school district in whole or in part within the county. In addition, the real property lister of each county must assign each lot in a subdivision created after the bill's effective date to the appropriate school district and notify DPI of that assignment. Under the bill, if the lot includes the boundary of two or more school districts, the real property lister must assign the lot to the school district that encompasses more than 50 percent of the lot's property. However, lots created by the subdivision platting process designated as next phase or identified as for future development and being greater than five acres are not subject to school district reassignment by the real property lister.

Who's behind it

7 representatives are its authors⁠. All 7 are Republicans.

2 more lawmakers signed on in support⁠.

What it would cost

State agencies filed a cost estimate. Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

• Fiscal Estimate From DPI