Assembly Bill 1164
Expenditure of $213,302.77 from the general fund in payment of a claim against the state made by JRT Top Notch Roofs, LLC. (FE)
Stopped in committee
It never got a , so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Mar 22, 2024
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. No public hearing was held.
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 15, 2024: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on State Affairs. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill directs the expenditure of $213,302.77 from the general fund in payment of a claim against the Department of Administration by JRT Top Notch Roofs, LLC. The claimant entered into a contract with DOA to replace the roof of Esker Hall at the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater. The claimant asserts that the bid documents stated that the project would begin “on or before” a date provided in the notice to proceed and that the notice to proceed stated that the project would begin “on or before” May 17, 2021. The claimant claims that the claimant submitted a tentative schedule with a start date of April 5, 2021, which was rejected by DOA.
The claimant asserts that the later start date affected its ability to acquire project materials in a timely manner and that DOA refused to negotiate the start date in good faith. The claimant claims that, despite its best efforts to meet DOA demands, DOA stopped communicating with the claimant and terminated the contract. The claimant asserts that the schedules it proposed were contractually compliant and that DOA had no right to terminate the contract. The claimant demands that DOA rescind the contract termination and reinstate the claimant on the project.
Read the full summary Show less
Alternatively, if the claimant is not allowed to complete the project, the claimant requests $213,302.77 in lost revenue. DOA concedes that the notice to proceed inadvertently stated that work would begin “on or before” May 17, 2021. However, DOA maintains that the contract signed by the claimant stated that work was to begin “on or after” the date specified in the notice to proceed, that the bid documents clearly stated that mobilization was not scheduled to take place until June 2021, and that any alleged confusion was resolved when DOA informed the claimant that it would not be permitted to mobilize until May 17, 2021. To the extent there was any confusion in the bid documents, DOA asserts that bidders were to notify DOA prior to the bid opening, which the claimant did not do. In response to the claimant's concerns about procuring materials, DOA asserts that it proposed extending the completion deadline by 16 days. DOA further notes that the contract allowed the claimant to obtain and request reimbursement for offsite materials storage. DOA maintains that any difficulties obtaining project materials were caused by the claimant's failure to purchase those materials in a timely manner. On July 21, 2022, the claims board denied the claim because it concluded that the claim raises questions of fact that are better evaluated by a court of law (see 2021 Senate Journal , p. 975).
Who's behind it
Rob Brooks, a Republican, is its .
See all the details Hide the names
Author (1)
- Rob Brooks · Republican, Assembly
What happened
-
Apr 15, 2024
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Mar 22, 2024
Sent to the Assembly Committee on State Affairs.
-
Mar 22, 2024
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Mar 22, 2024 · Assembly
Introduced by Representative Brooks
- Mar 22, 2024 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs
- Apr 15, 2024 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis