Skip to content
Bills from the 2023–24 session

Assembly Bill 144

Preliminary health care credentials granted to previously unlicensed individuals. (FE)

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 6, 2023

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 15, 2024: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill requires the Department of Safety and Professional Services to grant preliminary credentials to certain individuals who have recently completed the requirements to obtain a health care credential.

Under the bill, DSPS must grant a preliminary credential to an individual who attests to meeting all of the requirements for a corresponding permanent or training credential, including having completed all education, training, supervised experience, and similar requirements within the previous two-year period. The individual must also attest that he or she does not, to the best of his or her knowledge, have a disqualifying arrest or conviction record, and that he or she has been engaged by a health care employer to provide services that are within the scope of the credential that he or she is seeking. Finally, the individual must have also submitted an application for the permanent or training credential that remains pending.

Read the full summary

The health care employer must submit to DSPS the employer's national provider identifier and attest to having engaged the individual to provide the aforementioned services. The health care employer must also attest that the individual has, to the best of the health care employer's knowledge and with a reasonable degree of certainty, completed the required education, training, and supervised experience necessary for the corresponding permanent or training credential within the two years preceding the submission of the application for the preliminary credential, has passed required examinations, and has passed a background check performed by the health care employer.

The preliminary credential becomes effective upon the submission of the attestation by the health care employer or on a later date specified therein. The preliminary credential expires on the date that the application for the permanent or training credential is granted or denied. While providing services under a preliminary credential, the person is subject to all responsibilities and limitations of the corresponding permanent or training credential.

Who's behind it

21 representatives are its ⁠. All 21 are Republicans.

7 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 28 names

Authors (21)

Signed on in support (7)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 4 · Oct 19, 2023

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 5, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 4 · Oct 19, 2023

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 5, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 15, 2024

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Oct 19, 2023

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Oct 19, 2023

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 4.

  4. Jun 9, 2023

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Apr 12, 2023

    The committee held a public hearing.

  6. Apr 6, 2023

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform.

  7. Apr 6, 2023

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 6, 2023 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Goeben, Sortwell, Armstrong, Behnke, Bodden, Born, Dittrich, Donovan, Gustafson, Kitchens, Kurtz, Murphy, Mursau, O'Connor, Oldenburg, Penterman, Rozar, Schmidt, Schraa, Tittl and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Cabral-Guevara, Cowles, Felzkowski, Feyen, Jacque, Marklein and Stroebel

  2. Apr 6, 2023 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform

  3. Apr 12, 2023 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Jun 9, 2023 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Oct 9, 2023 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Sortwell

  6. Oct 11, 2023 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Oct 19, 2023 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 5, Noes 4

  8. Oct 19, 2023 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 5, Noes 4

  9. Oct 19, 2023 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Nov 2, 2023 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Goeben

  11. Jan 11, 2024 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-16-2024 by Committee on Rules

  12. Jan 16, 2024 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  13. Apr 15, 2024 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote