Skip to content
Bills from the 2023–24 session

Assembly Bill 149

Various changes to the unemployment insurance law. (FE)

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Aug 4, 2023. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 7, 2023

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 60 to 35

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 22 to 11

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Aug 4, 2023.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 15, 2024: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes various changes regarding the unemployment insurance (UI) law, which is administered by the Department of Workforce Development.

Suitable work; work search Current law requires that, as a condition of being eligible for UI benefits for a given week, a claimant must 1) be able to work and available for work; 2) register for work in the manner prescribed by DWD; and 3) conduct a reasonable search for suitable work. Separately, current law also makes a claimant ineligible for UI benefits if a claimant fails, without good cause, to accept suitable work when offered.

Read the full summary

The bill provides that an employer may report to DWD whenever 1) an individual declines a job interview or job offer; 2) an individual fails to respond to a job interview offer or job offer; 3) an individual fails to attend a scheduled job interview without attempting to reschedule the job interview; 4) a UI claimant is unavailable for, or unable to perform, work actually available within a given week;

or 5) under certain circumstances, the employer recalls a former employee receiving UI benefits who fails to return to work. The bill requires DWD to consider these reports in determining claimants' attachment to the labor market. The bill also provides that a UI claimant is not considered to have conducted a reasonable search for suitable work in a given week, and is therefore ineligible for benefits for that week, if the claimant had one or more credible reports without good cause of declining a job interview, failing to respond to a job interview offer, or failing to attend a job interview in that week. The bill, however, provides that the first such credible report is to be disregarded and allows subsequent reports to be disregarded upon certain showings by a claimant. The bill requires DWD to investigate each such report as needed to determine its effect on claimants' eligibility for benefits.

The bill requires DWD to include information on reports submitted by employers under the bill in its annual UI fraud report made to the Council on Unemployment Insurance, including actions taken by DWD in response to the reports and their effect on claimants' eligibility for benefits. In addition, the bill requires that this annual fraud report be submitted to the appropriate standing committees of the legislature.

The bill requires DWD to have in effect methods to address any circumstances in which a claimant for UI benefits fails to return to work or to accept suitable work without good cause or is unavailable for work or unable to work, including reporting methods for employers and a notice from DWD to claimants about the laws governing such circumstances.

Recovery of overpayments Current law allows DWD to act to recover overpayments in certain circumstances and allows overpayments to be required to be repaid in cases where an individual makes misrepresentations to obtain benefits in the name of another person. This bill makes such recoveries mandatory, instead of permissive.

Who's behind it

28 representatives are its ⁠. All 28 are Republicans.

9 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 37 names

Authors (28)

Signed on in support (9)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 5 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Workforce Development and Economic Opportunities vote to recommend it

Passed, 10 to 5 · Apr 18, 2023

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Workforce Development and Economic Opportunities, Ayes 10, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 60 to 35 · Apr 25, 2023 · 4 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (60)

Didn't vote (4)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 2 · May 26, 2023

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges, Ayes 4, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Jun 5, 2023

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 22 to 11 · Jun 7, 2023

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 15, 2024

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Mar 13, 2024

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Aug 4, 2023

    The governor vetoed it.

  4. Aug 2, 2023

    Sent to the governor.

  5. Jun 7, 2023

    The Senate passed it too, 22 to 11.

  6. Jun 5, 2023

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  7. May 26, 2023

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 2.

  8. May 2, 2023

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges.

  9. Apr 26, 2023

    The Senate received it.

  10. Apr 25, 2023

    The Assembly passed it, 60 to 35.

  11. Apr 24, 2023

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  12. Apr 18, 2023

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  13. Apr 18, 2023

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 5.

  14. Apr 17, 2023

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Apr 12, 2023

    The committee held a public hearing.

  16. Apr 11, 2023

    1 more representative and 1 senator signed on in support.

  17. Apr 7, 2023

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Workforce Development and Economic Opportunities.

  18. Apr 7, 2023

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 7, 2023 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Plumer, Moses, Penterman, Behnke, Binsfeld, Bodden, Brandtjen, Brooks, Dallman, Dittrich, Donovan, Edming, Green, Gundrum, Gustafson, Knodl, Magnafici, Murphy, Nedweski, O'Connor, Petersen, Petryk, Rettinger, Rozar, Schmidt, Snyder, Sortwell and Steffen; cosponsored by Senators Tomczyk, Cabral-Guevara, Felzkowski, Marklein, Nass and Stroebel

  2. Apr 7, 2023 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Workforce Development and Economic Opportunities

  3. Apr 11, 2023 · Assembly

    Senator Ballweg added as a cosponsor

  4. Apr 11, 2023 · Assembly

    Representative Michalski added as a coauthor

  5. Apr 12, 2023 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Apr 17, 2023 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Apr 18, 2023 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Apr 18, 2023 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Workforce Development and Economic Opportunities, Ayes 10, Noes 5

  9. Apr 18, 2023 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Apr 20, 2023 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-25-2023 by Committee on Rules

  11. Apr 24, 2023 · Assembly

    Representative Kitchens added as a coauthor

  12. Apr 25, 2023 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Apr 25, 2023 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Apr 25, 2023 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  15. Apr 25, 2023 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 60, Noes 35

  16. Apr 25, 2023 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Apr 26, 2023 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  18. May 2, 2023 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges

  19. May 24, 2023 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  20. May 26, 2023 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges, Ayes 4, Noes 2

  21. May 26, 2023 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  22. Jun 5, 2023 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  23. Jun 5, 2023 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 6-7-2023 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  24. Jun 7, 2023 · Senate

    Read a second time

  25. Jun 7, 2023 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  26. Jun 7, 2023 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  27. Jun 7, 2023 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 22, Noes 11

  28. Jun 7, 2023 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. Jun 7, 2023 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  30. Jun 12, 2023 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 6-12-2023

  31. Aug 2, 2023 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 8-2-2023

  32. Aug 4, 2023 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 8-4-2023

  33. Mar 13, 2024 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  34. May 14, 2024 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-14-2024 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  35. May 15, 2024 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote