Skip to content
Bills from the 2023–24 session

Assembly Bill 150

Various changes to the unemployment insurance law, federal Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment grants, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Aug 4, 2023. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 7, 2023

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 60 to 35

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 22 to 11

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Aug 4, 2023.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 15, 2024: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes various changes in the unemployment insurance (UI) law, which is administered by the Department of Workforce Development. Significant changes include all of the following:

Program name change The bill changes references in the statutes to “unemployment insurance” to “reemployment assistance” and requires the program and its benefits to be known as reemployment assistance. The bill also requires DWD to have a division known as the Division of Reemployment Assistance and requires the reemployment assistance law to be administered by that division.

Read the full summary

General qualifying requirements Under current law, a claimant for UI benefits is generally required to 1) register for work, 2) be able to work and available for work, and 3) conduct a work search for each week in order to remain eligible. A claimant is required to conduct at least four work search actions each week, and DWD may require, by rule, that an individual conduct more than four work search actions per week. Finally, if a claimant is claiming benefits for a week other than an initial week, the claimant must provide information or job application materials that are requested by DWD and participate in a public employment office workshop or training program or in similar reemployment services required by DWD.

The bill does the following:

1. Requires, for the third and subsequent weeks of a claimant's benefit year, that at least two of the required weekly work search actions be direct contacts with potential employers.

2. Requires a claimant who resides in this state, for each week other than an initial week, to submit and keep posted on the DWD's job center website a current resume.

3. Requires, when a claimant is claiming benefits with less than three weeks of benefits left, that the claimant complete a reemployment counseling session.

Additionally, current law allows DWD to use information or job application materials described above to assess a claimant's efforts, skills, and ability to find or obtain work and to develop a list of potential opportunities for a claimant to obtain suitable work. However, current law provides that a claimant who otherwise satisfies the required weekly work search requirement is not required to apply for any specific positions on the list of potential opportunities in order to satisfy the work search requirement. The bill requires, instead of allows, DWD to provide this assistance. The bill also repeals the language in current law providing that a claimant who otherwise satisfies the weekly work search requirement is not required to apply for specific positions provided by DWD and requires DWD to provide each claimant with at least four potential opportunities each week, one or more of which may be opportunities with a temporary help company.

Finally, current law allows DWD to require a claimant to participate in a public employment office workshop or training program. The bill provides that DWD must require a claimant to participate in a public employment office workshop or training program if the claimant is likely to exhaust regular UI benefits. DWD may also require other claimants to participate in a public employment office workshop or training program, but must prioritize claimants more likely to have difficulty obtaining reemployment.

Drug testing Current state law requires DWD to establish a program that is consistent with federal law to test certain claimants who apply for UI benefits for the presence of controlled substances. A claimant who tests positive for a controlled substance for which the claimant does not have a prescription is ineligible for UI benefits until certain requalification criteria are satisfied or unless he or she enrolls in a substance abuse treatment program and undergoes a job skills assessment, and a claimant who declines to submit to a test is simply ineligible for benefits until he or she requalifies.

Claimants who are required to undergo drug testing include individuals for whom suitable work is only available in occupations for which drug testing is regularly conducted in this state. However, current law provides that these provisions do not apply until DWD promulgates rules to implement the requirements and those rules take effect, including rules identifying occupations for which drug testing is regularly conducted in this state.

The bill requires DWD to immediately promulgate the required rules.

Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment grants Under federal law, the United States Department of Labor (USDOL) operates the Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment (RESEA) program, whereby grants are awarded to states to provide reemployment services to claimants.

Participation in the RESEA program is voluntary and requires that a state submit a state plan to USDOL that outlines how the state intends to conduct a program of reemployment services and eligibility assessments.

The bill requires that DWD act to continue to participate in the RESEA program and requires DWD to provide certain RESEA services to all UI claimants.

Who's behind it

29 representatives are its ⁠. All 29 are Republicans.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 34 names

Authors (29)

Signed on in support (5)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 5 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Labor and Integrated Employment vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 3 · Apr 19, 2023

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Labor and Integrated Employment, Ayes 5, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 60 to 35 · Apr 25, 2023 · 4 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (60)

Didn't vote (4)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 2 · May 26, 2023

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges, Ayes 4, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Jun 5, 2023

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 22 to 11 · Jun 7, 2023

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 15, 2024

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Mar 13, 2024

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Dec 8, 2023

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  4. Aug 4, 2023

    The governor vetoed it.

  5. Aug 2, 2023

    Sent to the governor.

  6. Jun 7, 2023

    The Senate passed it too, 22 to 11.

  7. Jun 5, 2023

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  8. May 26, 2023

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 2.

  9. May 2, 2023

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges.

  10. Apr 26, 2023

    The Senate received it.

  11. Apr 25, 2023

    The Assembly passed it, 60 to 35.

  12. Apr 24, 2023

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  13. Apr 19, 2023

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  14. Apr 19, 2023

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 3.

  15. Apr 17, 2023

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Apr 12, 2023

    The committee held a public hearing.

  17. Apr 10, 2023

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  18. Apr 7, 2023

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Labor and Integrated Employment.

  19. Apr 7, 2023

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 7, 2023 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Petryk, Allen, Armstrong, Behnke, Bodden, Born, Brooks, Dallman, Dittrich, Duchow, Edming, Green, Gundrum, Macco, Magnafici, Michalski, Moses, Mursau, Nedweski, O'Connor, Oldenburg, Penterman, Petersen, Plumer, Rettinger, Schmidt, Wichgers, Wittke and Pronschinske; cosponsored by Senators Quinn and Felzkowski

  2. Apr 7, 2023 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Labor and Integrated Employment

  3. Apr 10, 2023 · Assembly

    Representative Steffen added as a coauthor

  4. Apr 12, 2023 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Apr 17, 2023 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Apr 19, 2023 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Apr 19, 2023 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Labor and Integrated Employment, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  8. Apr 19, 2023 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Apr 20, 2023 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-25-2023 by Committee on Rules

  10. Apr 24, 2023 · Assembly

    Representative Kitchens added as a coauthor

  11. Apr 25, 2023 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  12. Apr 25, 2023 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Apr 25, 2023 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  14. Apr 25, 2023 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 60, Noes 35

  15. Apr 25, 2023 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Apr 26, 2023 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  17. May 2, 2023 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges

  18. May 24, 2023 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  19. May 26, 2023 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges, Ayes 4, Noes 2

  20. May 26, 2023 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  21. Jun 5, 2023 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  22. Jun 5, 2023 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 6-7-2023 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  23. Jun 7, 2023 · Senate

    Read a second time

  24. Jun 7, 2023 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Jun 7, 2023 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  26. Jun 7, 2023 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 22, Noes 11

  27. Jun 7, 2023 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Jun 7, 2023 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  29. Jun 9, 2023 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 6-9-2023

  30. Aug 2, 2023 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 8-2-2023

  31. Aug 4, 2023 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 8-4-2023

  32. Dec 8, 2023 · Assembly

    Representative Gustafson added as a coauthor

  33. Mar 13, 2024 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  34. May 14, 2024 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-14-2024 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  35. May 15, 2024 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote