Assembly Bill 152
Various changes to the unemployment insurance law and authorizing the secretary of administration to transfer employees from any executive branch agency to the Department of Workforce Development for certain purposes. (FE)
Vetoed by the governor
Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Aug 4, 2023. Lawmakers did not , so it stands.
-
Introduced, passed
Apr 7, 2023
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 59 to 35
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Jun 7, 2023
-
Governor, stopped here
Vetoed Aug 4, 2023.
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, May 15, 2024: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
Terms on this page
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Unemployment insurance This bill makes various changes in the unemployment insurance (UI) law, which is administered by the Department of Workforce Development. Significant changes include all of the following:
Identity proofing The bill requires DWD to implement identity-proofing measures for UI claimants who are engaging in benefit-related transactions with DWD that 1) require a claimant to verify his or her identity prior to filing an initial claim for benefits and when engaging in other transactions with DWD, and 2) achieve the IAL2 and AAL2 standards adopted in the National Institute of Standards and Technology's Digital Identity Guidelines.
Read the full summary Show less
Education and informational materials Current law requires DWD to compile and provide to employers certain information about how the UI system works, including a handbook on the UI system for employers and information concerning the financing of the UI system that is published on DWD's website. The bill requires DWD to also provide certain training materials for employers and claimants on the UI system. The bill requires DWD to publish training videos on its website and also to provide live training seminars for employing units that are free of charge and provided on a quarterly basis.
Assistance call center The bill requires DWD to operate a call center to assist claimants for UI benefits or similar federal payments. Under the bill, if the volume of calls has increased by 300 percent or more over the same week during the previous year or if there is a declared state of emergency for the state that causes or relates to an increase in UI claims, DWD is required to increase the hours for the call center to include evening hours after 5 p.m. and weekend hours.
Database comparisons The bill requires DWD to perform a comparison of state and national databases that track death records, employment records, and prison records against recipients of UI benefits for the purposes of detecting fraud or erroneous payments. The bill requires DWD to perform the comparison on at least a weekly basis. The bill provides that DWD may also make such comparisons with other databases.
Other changes Transfer of employees to DWD The bill authorizes the secretary of administration to temporarily transfer employees from any executive branch agency to DWD to assist in deciding UI appeals. Under the bill, DWD must pay all salary and fringe benefit costs of that employee during the time the employee is at DWD.
Who's behind it
18 representatives are its . All 18 are Republicans.
7 more lawmakers .
See all 25 names Hide the names
Authors (18)
- Elijah Behnke · Republican, Assembly
- Janel Brandtjen · Republican, Assembly
- Rob Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- James Edming · Republican, Assembly
- Rick Gundrum · Republican, Assembly
- Gus Gustafson · Republican, Assembly
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- John Macco · Republican, Assembly
- Clint Moses · Republican, Assembly
- Amanda Nedweski · Republican, Assembly
- Jerry O'Connor · Republican, Assembly
- Kevin Petersen · Republican, Assembly
- Warren Petryk · Republican, Assembly
- Jon Plumer · Republican, Assembly
- Nik Rettinger · Republican, Assembly
- Donna Rozar · Republican, Assembly
- Shae Sortwell · Republican, Assembly
- Chuck Wichgers · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (7)
- Mary Felzkowski · Republican, Senate
- Dan Feyen · Republican, Senate
- Joel Kitchens · Republican, Assembly
- Steve Nass · Republican, Senate
- Schraa and Duchow
- David Steffen · Republican, Assembly
- Duey Stroebel · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 5 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Workforce Development and Economic Opportunities vote to recommend it
Passed, 10 to 5 · Apr 18, 2023
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Workforce Development and Economic Opportunities, Ayes 10, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 59 to 35 · Apr 25, 2023 · 5 didn't vote
See how each of the 99 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (59)
- Adam Neylon (R, 15)
- Alex Dallman (R, 39)
- Amanda Nedweski (R, 32)
- Amy Binsfeld (R, 27)
- Angie Sapik (R, 73)
- Barbara Dittrich (R, 99)
- Bob Donovan (R, 61)
- Bob Wittke (R, 63)
- Calvin Callahan (R, 35)
- Chanz Green (R, 74)
- Chuck Wichgers (R, 84)
- Cindi Duchow (R, 97)
- Clint Moses (R, 92)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Dave Armstrong (R, 67)
- Dave Maxey (R, 83)
- Dave Murphy (R, 56)
- David Steffen (R, 4)
- Donna Rozar (R, 69)
- Elijah Behnke (R, 6)
- Ellen Schutt (R, 31)
- Gae Magnafici (R, 28)
- Gus Gustafson (R, 55)
- James Edming (R, 87)
- Janel Brandtjen (R, 22)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jerry O'Connor (R, 60)
- Jessie Rodriguez (R, 21)
- Joel Kitchens (R, 1)
- John Macco (R, 88)
- John Spiros (R, 86)
- Jon Plumer (R, 42)
- Joy Goeben (R, 5)
- Karen Hurd (R, 69)
- Kevin Petersen (R, 57)
- Loren Oldenburg (R, 96)
- Mark Born (R, 37)
- Michael Schraa (R, 53)
- Nancy VanderMeer (R, 70)
- Nik Rettinger (R, 83)
- Pat Snyder (R, 85)
- Paul Tittl (R, 25)
- Peter Schmidt (R, 6)
- Rob Summerfield (R, 68)
- Rob Swearingen (R, 34)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Ron Tusler (R, 3)
- Scott Johnson (R, 33)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Shae Sortwell (R, 2)
- Shannon Zimmerman (R, 30)
- Terry Katsma (R, 26)
- Todd Novak (R, 51)
- Tom Michalski (R, 13)
- Tony Kurtz (R, 41)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
- Ty Bodden (R, 59)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
- Warren Petryk (R, 93)
No (35)
- Alex Joers (D, 81)
- Christine Sinicki (D, 20)
- Clint Anderson (D, 45)
- Daniel Riemer (D, 7)
- Darrin Madison (D, 10)
- Dave Considine (D, 81)
- Deb Andraca (D, 23)
- Dora Drake (D, 4)
- Evan Goyke (D, 18)
- Francesca Hong (D, 76)
- Greta Neubauer (D, 66)
- Jenna Jacobson (D, 50)
- Jill Billings (D, 95)
- Jimmy Anderson (D, 47)
- Jodi Emerson (D, 91)
- Kalan Haywood (D, 16)
- Katrina Shankland (D, 71)
- Kristina Shelton (D, 90)
- LaKeshia Myers (D, 12)
- Lee Snodgrass (D, 52)
- Lisa Subeck (D, 79)
- Lori Palmeri (D, 54)
- Marisabel Cabrera (D, 9)
- Melissa Ratcliff (D, 16)
- Mike Bare (D, 80)
- Robyn Vining (D, 13)
- Ryan Clancy (D, 19)
- Samba Baldeh (D, 48)
- Shelia Stubbs (D, 78)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
- Sue Conley (D, 44)
- Supreme Moore Omokunde (D, 17)
- Sylvia Ortiz-Velez (D, 8)
- Tip McGuire (D, 64)
- Tod Ohnstad (D, 65)
Didn't vote (5)
- Rick Gundrum (R, 58)
- Rob Brooks (R, 59)
- Scott Allen (R, 82)
- Treig Pronschinske (R, 29)
- Will Penterman (R, 38)
Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges vote to recommend it
Passed, 4 to 2 · May 26, 2023
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges, Ayes 4, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 3 to 2 · Jun 5, 2023
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 22 to 11 · Jun 7, 2023
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (22)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Cory Tomczyk (R, 29)
- Dan Feyen (R, 20)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Devin LeMahieu (R, 9)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Eric Wimberger (R, 2)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Jesse James (R, 23)
- Joan Ballweg (R, 14)
- John Jagler (R, 13)
- Julian Bradley (R, 28)
- Mary Felzkowski (R, 12)
- Patrick Testin (R, 24)
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara (R, 19)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Rob Hutton (R, 5)
- Rob Stafsholt (R, 10)
- Romaine Quinn (R, 25)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
No (11)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Brad Pfaff (D, 32)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dianne Hesselbein (D, 27)
- Jeff Smith (D, 31)
- Kelda Roys (D, 26)
- LaTonya Johnson (D, 6)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Mark Spreitzer (D, 15)
- Melissa Agard (D, 16)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 15, 2024
The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.
-
Mar 13, 2024
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Aug 4, 2023
The governor vetoed it.
-
Aug 2, 2023
Sent to the governor.
-
Jun 7, 2023
“Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)
-
Jun 7, 2023
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Jun 7, 2023
The Senate passed it too, 22 to 11.
-
Jun 7, 2023
The Senate adopted it.
-
Jun 5, 2023
“Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)
-
May 26, 2023
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 2.
-
May 2, 2023
Sent to the Senate Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges.
-
Apr 26, 2023
The Senate received it.
-
Apr 25, 2023
The Assembly passed it, 59 to 35.
-
Apr 24, 2023
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Apr 18, 2023
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Apr 18, 2023
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 5.
-
Apr 17, 2023
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Apr 12, 2023
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Apr 10, 2023 to Apr 11, 2023
3 more representatives signed on in support.
-
Apr 7, 2023
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Workforce Development and Economic Opportunities.
-
Apr 7, 2023
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Apr 7, 2023 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives O'Connor, Gundrum, Brooks, Rozar, Petryk, Sortwell, Edming, Behnke, Moses, Nedweski, Plumer, Knodl, Macco, Brandtjen, Petersen, Wichgers, Gustafson and Rettinger; cosponsored by Senators Feyen, Stroebel, Nass and Felzkowski
- Apr 7, 2023 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Workforce Development and Economic Opportunities
- Apr 10, 2023 · Assembly
Representative Steffen added as a coauthor
- Apr 11, 2023 · Assembly
- Apr 12, 2023 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 17, 2023 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 17, 2023 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 18, 2023 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 18, 2023 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Workforce Development and Economic Opportunities, Ayes 10, Noes 5
- Apr 18, 2023 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 20, 2023 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 4-25-2023 by Committee on Rules
- Apr 24, 2023 · Assembly
Representative Kitchens added as a coauthor
- Apr 25, 2023 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 25, 2023 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 25, 2023 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 25, 2023 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 59, Noes 35
- Apr 25, 2023 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 26, 2023 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- May 2, 2023 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges
- May 24, 2023 · Senate
Executive action taken
- May 26, 2023 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges, Ayes 4, Noes 2
- May 26, 2023 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jun 5, 2023 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Feyen
- Jun 5, 2023 · Senate
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Jun 5, 2023 · Senate
Placed on calendar 6-7-2023 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Jun 7, 2023 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jun 7, 2023 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 adopted
- Jun 7, 2023 · Senate
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
- Jun 7, 2023 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jun 7, 2023 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 22, Noes 11
- Jun 7, 2023 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jun 7, 2023 · Assembly
Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate amendment 1 adopted)
- Jun 7, 2023 · Assembly
Senate Amendment 1 concurred in
- Jun 7, 2023 · Assembly
Action ordered immediately messaged
- Jun 12, 2023 · Assembly
LRB correction
- Jun 12, 2023 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 6-12-2023
- Aug 2, 2023 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 8-2-2023
- Aug 4, 2023 · Assembly
Report vetoed by the Governor on 8-4-2023
- Mar 13, 2024 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- May 14, 2024 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 5-14-2024 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
- May 15, 2024 · Assembly
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
Terms on this page
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote