Skip to content

Bills · 2023-2024 Regular Session

AB 275

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: damages claims relating to delayed relocation of utilities in a highway right-of-way and modifying administrative rules promulgated by the Department of Transportation. (FE)

Administrative rules — Revisions Claims Collective bargaining Contractor Electric utility Road — Construction and repair Transportation department of — Roads

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill creates a process for a highway improvement contractor to seek

damages for project delays that are the result of an uncompleted relocation or

adjustment of a utility facility located in the right-of-way of the highway. “Utility

facility” means any pipe, pipeline, duct, wire line, conduit, pole, tower, equipment,

or other structure used for transmission, distribution, or delivery of electrical power,

light, heat, water, gas, sewer, telegraph, or telecommunication services.

Under current law, if a utility facility is within the right-of-way of a proposed

highway project, the Department of Transportation must notify the owner, who must

then provide DOT with a description and general location of each utility facility. DOT

must then provide the owner with a set of plans for the proposed project. The owner

must submit a work plan to DOT proposing any relocations or adjustments to utility

facilities required by the proposed project. DOT must review work plans for

compliance with permit requirements and, once approved, notify the owner when

utility facility relocation work may begin.

Under the bill, a contractor that incurs costs as a result of a utility relocation

delay may file a utility delay damages claim with the department. “Utility relocation

delay” means a change in operations of a contractor or the rescheduling of work by

a contractor that is caused by the uncompleted relocation or adjustment of a utility

facility located in the right-of way, regardless of whether the relocation or

adjustment of the utility facility is identified in a plan.

The bill requires DOT to notify the owner of the relevant utility facility upon

receipt of a damages claim. The owner may respond to the claim by providing

additional information related to the claim. DOT must consider all information

provided and, if DOT determines that a utility relocation delay occurred, must

compensate the contractor for costs incurred as a result.

Under the bill, if a utility relocation delay was caused by a utility facility

owner's failure to complete a relocation in accordance with an approved plan, the

utility facility owner is liable to DOT for any compensation paid to a contractor as

a result of a utility relocation delay. The owner must make payment to DOT within

60 days, subject to the right to appeal DOT's determination. If the owner fails to

make the required payment, DOT may seek remedy by filing a civil suit against the

owner.

The bill requires DOT to submit a report to the Joint Committee on Finance

within four years providing specified information about utility relocation damages

claims received by DOT. Within six months of receipt of the report, JFC must make

a recommendation as to whether the process created by the bill should be amended

or repealed.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Bodden (R) , Edming (R) , Green (R) , Maxey (R) , Mursau (R) , Plumer (R) , Rettinger (R) , Schmidt (R) , Spiros (R) , Steffen (R) , Swearingen (R) , VanderMeer (R) , Wittke (R)

4 cosponsors

Cowles (R) , James (R) , Testin (R) , Tomczyk (R)

Full history

  1. May 17, 2023 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Steffen, Edming, Bodden, Green, Maxey, Mursau, Plumer, Rettinger, Schmidt, Spiros, Swearingen, VanderMeer and Wittke; cosponsored by Senators Tomczyk, Cowles, Testin and James

  2. May 17, 2023 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation

  3. May 22, 2023 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Steffen

  4. May 23, 2023 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. May 23, 2023 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Aug 22, 2023 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Steffen

  7. Apr 15, 2024 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1