Bills · 2023-2024 Regular Session
Relating to: extreme risk protection temporary restraining orders and injunctions and providing a penalty. (FE)
Court — Procedure Crime and criminals — Felony Firearms and dangerous weapons Legislature — Criminal penalties joint review committee on
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a person is prohibited from possessing a firearm, and must
surrender all firearms, if the person is subject to a domestic abuse injunction, a child
abuse injunction, or, in certain cases, a harassment or an individuals-at-risk
injunction. If a person surrenders a firearm because the person is subject to one of
those injunctions, the firearm may not be returned to the person until a court
determines that the injunction has been vacated or has expired and that the person
is not otherwise prohibited from possessing a firearm. A person who is prohibited
from possessing a firearm under such an injunction is guilty of a Class G felony for
violating the prohibition.
This bill creates an extreme risk protection temporary restraining order and
injunction to prohibit a person from possessing a firearm. Under the bill, either a
law enforcement officer or a family or household member of the person may file a
petition with a court to request an extreme risk protection injunction. The petition
must allege facts that show that the person is substantially likely to injure himself
or herself or another if the person possesses a firearm.
Under the bill, the petitioner may request the court to consider first granting
a temporary restraining order. If the petitioner does request a TRO, the petitioner
must include evidence that there is an immediate and present danger that the person
may injure himself or herself or another if the person possesses a firearm and that
waiting for the injunction hearing increases the immediate and present danger.
If the petitioner requests a TRO, the court must hear the petition in an
expedited manner. The judge must issue a TRO if, after questioning the petitioner
and witnesses or relying on affidavits, the judge determines that it is substantially
likely that the petition for an injunction will be granted and the judge finds good
cause to believe there is an immediate and present danger that the person will injure
himself or herself or another if the person has a firearm and that waiting for the
injunction hearing may increase the immediate and present danger. If the judge
issues a TRO, the TRO is in effect until the injunction hearing, which must occur
within 14 days of the TRO issuance. The TRO must require a law enforcement officer
to personally serve the person with the order and to require the person to
immediately surrender all firearms in his or her possession. If a law enforcement
officer is unable to personally serve the person, then the TRO requires the person to
surrender within 24 hours all firearms to a law enforcement officer or a firearms
dealer and to provide the court a receipt indicating the surrender occurred.
At the injunction hearing, the court may grant an extreme risk protection
injunction ordering the person to refrain from possessing a firearm and, if the person
was not subject to a TRO, to surrender all firearms he or she possesses if the court
finds by clear and convincing evidence that the person is substantially likely to injure
himself or herself or another if the person possesses a firearm. An extreme risk
protection injunction is effective for up to one year and may be renewed. A person
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Andraca (D) , Baldeh (D) , Bare (D) , Billings (D) , C. Anderson (D) , Cabrera (D) , Conley (D) , Considine (D) , Donovan (R) , Doyle (D) , Drake (D) , Goyke (D) , Hong (D) , J. Anderson (D) , Jacobson (D) , Joers (D) , Moore Omokunde (D) , Myers (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Ortiz-Velez (D) , Palmeri (D) , Ratcliff (D) , Shelton (D) , Sinicki (D) , Snodgrass (D) , Stubbs (D) , Subeck (D) , Vining (D)
Full history
- Jul 17, 2023 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Andraca, Stubbs, C. Anderson, J. Anderson, Baldeh, Bare, Billings, Cabrera, Conley, Considine, Donovan, Doyle, Goyke, Hong, Jacobson, Joers, Moore Omokunde, Myers, Ohnstad, Palmeri, Ratcliff, Shelton, Sinicki, Snodgrass, Subeck, Vining, Drake and Ortiz-Velez; cosponsored by Senators Taylor, Agard, L. Johnson, Carpenter, Hesselbein, Larson, Roys, Smith and Spreitzer
- Jul 17, 2023 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary
- Jul 25, 2023 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 24, 2023 · Assembly
Senator Wirch added as a cosponsor
- Sep 27, 2023 · Assembly
Representative Haywood added as a coauthor
- Feb 14, 2024 · Assembly
Representative Emerson added as a coauthor
- Mar 7, 2024 · Assembly
Representative Neubauer added as a coauthor
- Apr 15, 2024 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1