Assembly Bill 483
Expenditure of $927,428.70 from the general fund in payment of a claim against the state made by Zenith Tech, Inc. (FE)
Stopped in committee
It never got a , so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 12, 2023
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. No public hearing was held.
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 15, 2024: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on State Affairs. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill directs expenditure of $927,428.70 from the general fund in payment of a claim against the Department of Transportation by Zenith Tech, Inc. The claimant entered into a contract with DOT to remove and reconstruct the West Milwaukee Street Stock River Bridge in Janesville, Wisconsin. The claimant asserts that the water levels on site were dangerously high throughout much of the project and created site conditions materially different than those indicated in the contract documents and that the changed conditions resulted in delays and additional expenses. Due to site conditions, the claimant requested DOT delay the start of the project which DOT refused. DOT maintains that the claimant should not have relied on the hydraulic information in the project specification, that the claimant should not have relied on specific river conditions that were subject to change, and that the claimant was responsible for choosing the means and methods for performing its work. The claimant asserted it is entitled to an equitable adjustment in the contract price and requested $471,926.70 for additional costs, $276,902.00 for winter inefficiency costs, and reversal of $165,600.00 in liquidated damages imposed by DOT. On September 7, 2021, the claims board denied the claim because it concluded that the claimant did not demonstrate the criteria necessary to justify a change in work order under the contract, and that the claimant has raised questions of fact regarding its request to delay the project's start date that are better evaluated by a court of law (see 2021 Assembly Journal , p. 488).
Who's behind it
Alex Dallman, a Republican, is its .
See all the details Hide the names
Author (1)
- Alex Dallman · Republican, Assembly
What happened
-
Apr 15, 2024
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Oct 12, 2023
Sent to the Assembly Committee on State Affairs.
-
Oct 12, 2023
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 12, 2023 · Assembly
Introduced by Representative Dallman
- Oct 12, 2023 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs
- Apr 15, 2024 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis