Bills · 2023-2024 Regular Session
Relating to: statutory changes to implement the constitutional amendment relating to conditions of release.
Constitutional amendments — Second consideration Court — Procedure Crime and criminals — Felony Statutes — Revision Sterilization
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under the Wisconsin Constitution, a person accused of a crime is eligible for
release before conviction under reasonable conditions designed to do any of the
following: 1) assure that he or she will appear in court; 2) protect members of the
community from serious bodily harm; or 3) prevent the intimidation of witnesses.
The conditions of release may include monetary bail only if the court finds that there
is a reasonable basis to believe that bail is necessary to assure that the defendant will
appear in court. The Wisconsin Statutes relating to preconviction release contain the
same language as the constitution.
A proposed amendment to the Wisconsin Constitution, to be given second
consideration by the 2023 legislature for submittal to the voters in April 2023,
changes these provisions. This bill changes the statutes relating to preconviction
release to conform to the changes in the proposed constitutional amendment. The bill
will take effect when the amendment is ratified by the voters and will be void if the
amendment is not ratified by the voters.
Conditions of preconviction release
The proposed constitutional amendment provides that a defendant is eligible
for release before conviction under reasonable conditions designed to protect
members of the community from “serious harm as defined by the legislature by law,”
not just “serious bodily harm.” The bill defines “serious harm,” as required by the
amendment, and harmonizes the statutes with the amended constitutional
provision to allow the court to set reasonable conditions designed to protect members
of the community from serious harm. Under the bill, “serious harm” is defined as any
of the following: 1) personal physical pain or injury, illness, any impairment of
physical condition, or death, including mental anguish or emotional harm attendant
to the personal physical pain or injury, illness, or death; 2) damage to property over
$2,500 in value; or 3) economic loss over $2,500 in value.
When bail may be imposed
The proposed constitutional amendment also expands the reasons why a court
may impose monetary bail on a defendant as a condition of release. Under current
law, monetary bail may be imposed only if the court finds that there is a reasonable
basis to believe bail is necessary to assure that the defendant will appear in court.
The proposed constitutional amendment adds that, if the defendant is accused of a
violent crime as defined by the legislature by law, monetary bail may be imposed if
the court finds that there is a reasonable basis to believe that bail is necessary based
on the totality of the circumstances. The proposed amendment provides that, when
considering the totality of the circumstances, the court may take into account
whether the defendant has a previous conviction for a violent crime as defined by the
legislature by law; the probability that the defendant will fail to appear; the need to
protect members of the community from serious harm as defined by the legislature
by law; the need to prevent the intimidation of witnesses; and the potential
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 6, Noes 1
Passed 6–1 Mar 13, 2023 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 20, 2023 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Duchow, Behnke, Brooks, Dittrich, Donovan, Edming, Kitchens, Magnafici, Michalski, Murphy, Novak, O'Connor, Rettinger, Rodriguez, Rozar, Spiros, Steffen, Wichgers and Wittke; cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard, Bradley, Stroebel, Cowles, Marklein and Tomczyk
- Feb 20, 2023 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary
- Mar 2, 2023 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 7, 2023 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 13, 2023 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 6, Noes 1
- Mar 13, 2023 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 14, 2023 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 3-22-2023 by Committee on Rules
- Mar 22, 2023 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Neubauer
- Mar 22, 2023 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Apr 15, 2024 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1