Skip to content

Bills · 2023-2024 Regular Session

AB 544

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: court-issued criminal complaints if the person's actions were in self-defense.

Court — Procedure Crime and criminals District attorney Evidence

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a district attorney has the discretion as to whether or not

to issue a complaint to charge a person with a crime. Current law also provides that,

if a district attorney refuses to issue a complaint against a person, a judge may

conduct a hearing to determine if there is probable cause to believe that the person

committed a crime and, if so, issue a complaint.

Under this bill, if the district attorney refused to issue the complaint because

the person has a defense of self-defense, the court may not conduct a hearing or issue

a complaint unless the court has new evidence that the person's actions were not

self-defense under the law.

Under current law, a person is privileged to threaten or intentionally use force

against an actor to prevent or terminate what the person reasonably believes to be

an unlawful interference with himself or herself or another person by the actor. The

person may intentionally use only force or threat as the person believes is necessary

to prevent or terminate the interference. Certain presumptions apply if the person

is in his or her house, business, or vehicle. In addition, if the person engaged in

unlawful conduct that was likely to provoke an attack and does provoke an attack,

the person generally loses the privilege of self-defense.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Bodden (R) , Brandtjen (R) , Dittrich (R) , Donovan (R) , Gundrum (R) , Moses (R) , Mursau (R) , O'Connor (R) , Rettinger (R) , Rozar (R) , Schutt (R) , Wichgers (R)

7 cosponsors

Bradley (R) , Felzkowski (R) , Hutton (R) , James (R) , Maxey (R) , Nass (R) , Wanggaard (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 5, Noes 2

Passed 5–2 Feb 7, 2024 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Oct 18, 2023 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Moses, Rettinger, Donovan, Schutt, O'Connor, Dittrich, Rozar, Gundrum, Mursau, Wichgers, Bodden and Brandtjen; cosponsored by Senators Hutton, Bradley, Wanggaard, James, Felzkowski and Nass

  2. Oct 18, 2023 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  3. Jan 11, 2024 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 16, 2024 · Assembly

    Representative Maxey added as a coauthor

  5. Jan 24, 2024 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 7, 2024 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 5, Noes 2

  7. Feb 7, 2024 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Feb 13, 2024 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-15-2024 by Committee on Rules

  9. Feb 15, 2024 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  10. Apr 15, 2024 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1