Assembly Bill 570
Certain kinds of election fraud, defects on absentee ballot certificates, returning absentee ballots to the office of the municipal clerk, appointment of election officials, allowing an employee of a residential care facility or qualified retirement home to serve as a personal care voting assistant during a public health emergency or an incident of infectious disease, and providing a penalty. (FE)
Vetoed by the governor
Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Mar 21, 2024. Lawmakers did not , so it stands.
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 26, 2023
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Nov 9, 2023
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed 21 to 11
-
Governor, stopped here
Vetoed Mar 21, 2024.
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, May 15, 2024: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
Terms on this page
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Retirement homes and residential care facilities Personal care voting assistants Under current law, absentee voting in person inside residential care facilities and qualified retirement homes may be conducted only if the municipal clerk or board of election commissioners adopts procedures allowing voters residing in such a facility or home to apply for, receive, and complete an absentee ballot by means of special voting deputies dispatched to the facility or home for that purpose. A municipality that appoints special voting deputies must appoint at least two special voting deputies for the municipality, and the deputies must be eligible voters of the county where the municipality is located. In addition, the two deputies designated to visit each qualified retirement home and residential care facility must be affiliated with different political parties whenever deputies representing different parties are available. Current law prohibits individuals employed at a residential care facility or qualified retirement home in the municipality, or any member of the individual's immediate family, from serving as a special voting deputy.
Under this bill, during a public health emergency or an incident of infectious disease that results in restricting entry to a residential care facility or qualified retirement home, the municipal clerk or board of election commissioners may appoint any individual who is employed at a residential care facility or qualified retirement home in the municipality to serve as a personal care voting assistant. A personal care voting assistant need not be an eligible voter of the county but must be an eligible voter of this state. A personal care voting assistant must complete a two-hour online training prescribed by the Elections Commission and take the same oath of office as a special voting deputy appointed under current law. In addition, the two personal care voting assistants appointed to each facility or home must be affiliated with different political parties whenever assistants representing different parties are available. The bill also prohibits a personal care voting assistant from assisting in or facilitating the registration of any resident of a residential care facility or qualified retirement home.
Read the full summary Show less
Under the bill, an employee of the facility or home acting as a personal care voting assistant must complete documentation, on a form prescribed by the Elections Commission, that provides the assistant's name, the name of the voter, and the type of assistance provided to the voter. The form must be separate from the absentee ballot certificate, but the information contained on the form must also be included on the absentee ballot return envelope. The administrator of the home or facility must deliver the forms to the municipal clerk or board of election commissioners and may arrange for an election official, other than a personal care voting assistant, to collect and return the absentee ballots to the clerk or board. Otherwise, all absentee ballots completed with the assistance of a personal care voting assistant must be mailed to the clerk or board.
Entry to a facility The bill prohibits residential care facilities and qualified retirement homes from denying entry to special voting deputies appointed under current law, except when the facility or home is closed to the public during a public health emergency or an incident of infectious disease. Under the bill, if a home or facility is closed to the public during such an emergency or incident, the home or facility must allow personal care voting assistants to supervise the absentee voting procedure used by occupants of the home or facility.
In addition, under the bill, no administrator of a qualified retirement home or residential care facility may deny a special voting deputy from entering the home or facility unless the governor declares a public health emergency.
Visits to facilities Under current law, the special voting deputies must, not later than 5 p.m. on the sixth working day preceding an election, arrange with the administrator of the qualified retirement home or residential care facility one or more convenient times to visit the home or facility. Current law also requires that the visits be no earlier than the fourth Monday preceding the election and no later than 5 p.m. on the Monday preceding the election.
Under the bill, the special voting deputies must make arrangements to visit the qualified retirement homes or residential care facilities no later than 5 p.m. on the 11th working day preceding the election, and the visits may be no earlier than the fourth Monday preceding the election and no later than 5 p.m. on the sixth working day preceding the election.
Under current law, if an eligible voter at a residential care facility or qualified retirement home is not able to cast his or her ballot on two separate visits by special voting deputies to the home or facility, the deputies must notify the municipal clerk or board of election commissioners. The clerk or board may then send the voter an absentee ballot no later than the Friday before the election. Under the bill, if an eligible voter of a facility or home is not able to cast his or her ballot on two separate visits by the special voting deputies because access to the home or facility is restricted due to a public health emergency or incident of infectious disease, the deputies must notify the municipal clerk or board of election commissioners. The clerk or board may then send the voter an absentee ballot as provided under current law.
Penalty Finally, the bill provides that an employee of a qualified retirement home or residential care facility who coerces an occupant of the home or facility to apply for or not apply for an absentee ballot or to cast or refrain from casting a ballot or who coerces an occupant to cast a ballot for or against a particular candidate or ballot question is guilty of a Class I felony. In addition, an employee of a qualified retirement home or residential care facility who coerces an occupant of the home or facility to register or not register to vote is guilty of a Class I felony.
Election fraud Current law prohibits election officials from committing certain kinds of election fraud, including permitting a person to register to vote or vote when the election official knows the person is not qualified to do so. The bill provides further that no election official may do any of the following:
1. Intentionally assist or cause the casting or counting of a vote or the receipt of a registration that the election official knows is invalid.
2. Intentionally assist or cause a vote or registration to be rejected when the election official knows the vote or registration is valid.
3. Intentionally fail to promptly report election fraud committed by another election official.
Under the bill, election officials violating the prohibitions described above are guilty of a Class I felony.
Absentee ballot certificates Under current law, absentee ballot envelopes include a printed certificate that must be completed, signed by the voter and a qualified witness, and returned to the municipal clerk with the completed ballot so that it is delivered to the polling place no later than 8 p.m. on election day. By completing and signing the certificate, the voter certifies that he or she is entitled to vote in the election and that the voter completed his or her absentee ballot in the presence of the witness. The witness certificate includes the witness's printed name and address in addition to his or her signature. If a municipal clerk receives an absentee ballot with an improperly completed certificate or with no certificate, the clerk may, but is not required to, return the ballot to the voter whenever time permits so that the voter may correct the defect. If a certificate is missing the address of the witness, the ballot may not be counted.
Under the bill, if a municipal clerk receives an absentee ballot with an improperly completed certificate or with no certificate, in addition to being authorized to return the ballot to the elector, the clerk is required to post a notification of the defect on the voter's voter information page on the website that is used by voters for original registration, currently titled MyVote Wisconsin.
Additionally, under the bill, the clerk may attempt to notify the voter of the defect by other means.
Additionally, under the bill, an absentee ballot with no certificate or with a certificate that does not include all of the following may not be counted:
1. The voter 's printed first name.
2. The voter's printed last name.
3. The voter's house or apartment number.
4. The voter's street name.
5. The voter's municipality.
6. The voter's signature.
7. The witness's printed first name.
8. The witness's printed last name.
9. The witness's house or apartment number.
10. The witness's street name.
11. The witness's municipality.
12. The witness's signature.
Finally, the bill prohibits any person other than the voter, or the witness with respect to the witness certificate, from correcting a defect in the voter's absentee ballot certificate. Whoever violates that prohibition is subject to a fine not to exceed $500 or imprisonment not to exceed 30 days, or both.
Appointment of poll workers The bill prohibits the appointment of any poll worker who is an employee of any of the following:
1. A candidate committee, legislative campaign committee, political action committee, independent expenditure committee, political party, recall committee, or referendum committee, as those terms are defined by law.
2. A political organization required to register with the Federal Election Commission.
3. An issue advocacy group.
Municipal board of canvassers Down Down /2023/related/proposals/ab570 true proposaltext /2023/related/proposals/ab570 proposaltext/2023/REG/AB570 proposaltext/2023/REG/AB570 section true Menu » 2023 » Related Documents » Proposal Text » AB570: Bill Text × Details for PDF view Link (Permanent link) Bookmark this location View toggle Go to top of document Search in this chapter Search in this section Search in this agency Search in this chapter group Search in this chapter Search in this section Cross references for section Acts affecting this section References to this 1970 Statutes Annotations Appellate Court Citations Administrative Code Index Reference lines Clear highlighting $(document).ready(function () {
$('[data-toggle=tooltip]').tooltip({ container: 'body' });
});
Who's behind it
9 representatives are its . All 9 are Republicans.
2 more lawmakers .
See all 11 names Hide the names
Authors (9)
- Dave Armstrong · Republican, Assembly
- James Edming · Republican, Assembly
- John Macco · Republican, Assembly
- Dave Maxey · Republican, Assembly
- Tom Michalski · Republican, Assembly
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- Nik Rettinger · Republican, Assembly
- David Steffen · Republican, Assembly
- Nancy VanderMeer · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (2)
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- Jerry O'Connor · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 4 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 3 · Nov 7, 2023
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Campaigns and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 3 · Nov 7, 2023
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Campaigns and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Shared Revenue vote to recommend it
Passed, 3 to 2 · Jan 11, 2024
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Shared Revenue, Elections and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 21 to 11 · Jan 16, 2024 · 1 didn't vote
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (21)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Dan Feyen (R, 20)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Devin LeMahieu (R, 9)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Eric Wimberger (R, 2)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Jesse James (R, 23)
- Joan Ballweg (R, 14)
- John Jagler (R, 13)
- Julian Bradley (R, 28)
- Mary Felzkowski (R, 12)
- Patrick Testin (R, 24)
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara (R, 19)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Rob Hutton (R, 5)
- Rob Stafsholt (R, 10)
- Romaine Quinn (R, 25)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
No (11)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Brad Pfaff (D, 32)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Cory Tomczyk (R, 29)
- Dianne Hesselbein (D, 27)
- Jeff Smith (D, 31)
- Kelda Roys (D, 26)
- LaTonya Johnson (D, 6)
- Mark Spreitzer (D, 15)
- Melissa Agard (D, 16)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
Didn't vote (1)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 15, 2024
The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.
-
Mar 21, 2024
The governor vetoed it.
-
Mar 18, 2024
Sent to the governor.
-
Jan 16, 2024
The Senate passed it too, 21 to 11.
-
Jan 11, 2024
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.
-
Dec 19, 2023
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Nov 13, 2023
Sent to the Senate Committee on Shared Revenue, Elections and Consumer Protection.
-
Nov 10, 2023
The Senate received it.
-
Nov 9, 2023
The Assembly passed it.
-
Nov 9, 2023
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Nov 7, 2023
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Nov 7, 2023
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 3.
-
Nov 6, 2023
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 3, 2023
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Nov 2, 2023
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 26, 2023
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections.
-
Oct 26, 2023
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 26, 2023 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Maxey, Macco, Armstrong, Edming, Michalski, Murphy, Rettinger, Steffen and VanderMeer; cosponsored by Senator Jacque
- Oct 26, 2023 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Campaigns and Elections
- Nov 1, 2023 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Michalski
- Nov 2, 2023 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Nov 3, 2023 · Assembly
Representative O'Connor added as a coauthor
- Nov 6, 2023 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 7, 2023 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Nov 7, 2023 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Campaigns and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 3
- Nov 7, 2023 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Campaigns and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 3
- Nov 7, 2023 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Nov 7, 2023 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 11-9-2023 by Committee on Rules
- Nov 9, 2023 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Nov 9, 2023 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
- Nov 9, 2023 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 9, 2023 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Nov 9, 2023 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Nov 9, 2023 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 10, 2023 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Nov 13, 2023 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Shared Revenue, Elections and Consumer Protection
- Dec 19, 2023 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 11, 2024 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 11, 2024 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Shared Revenue, Elections and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Jan 11, 2024 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 12, 2024 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-16-2024 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Jan 16, 2024 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jan 16, 2024 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 16, 2024 · Senate
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
- Jan 16, 2024 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 21, Noes 11
- Jan 16, 2024 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 16, 2024 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Jan 19, 2024 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 1-19-2024
- Jan 19, 2024 · Assembly
LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 1)
- Mar 18, 2024 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 3-18-2024
- Mar 21, 2024 · Assembly
Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-21-2024
- May 14, 2024 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 5-14-2024 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
- May 15, 2024 · Assembly
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
Terms on this page
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote