Bills · 2023-2024 Regular Session
Relating to: absentee voting in certain residential care facilities and retirement homes and court determinations of incompetency and ineligibility to vote.
Circuit court Civil defense Elections — Ballots Elections — Campaign expense Elections commission Electric utility Mental health Municipality — Officers Nursing homes and adult care Nutrition Voting
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Passes Senate, stopped here
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Absentee voting in certain facilities
Under current law, under certain circumstances, a municipal clerk must
dispatch special voting deputies to a residential care facility or qualified retirement
home so that the occupants of the facility or home may cast an absentee ballot in
person with the special voting deputies rather than vote in person at the appropriate
polling place or request and complete an absentee ballot by mail. Under current law,
a retirement home is a facility occupied as a primary residence by 10 or more
unrelated individuals. A qualified retirement home is a retirement home that has
a significant number of occupants who lack adequate transportation to the polling
place, need assistance in voting, are aged 60 or over, or are indefinitely confined.
Under current law, the special voting deputies must arrange with the
administrator of the residential care facility or qualified retirement home one or
more convenient times to visit the facility or home. The administrator of the facility
or home may, upon the request of a relative of an occupant of the facility or home,
notify the relative of the time or times when special voting deputies will conduct
absentee voting at the facility or home.
This bill requires the administrator, or the administrator's designee, to provide
notice by email of the dates and times when the deputies will be visiting the
residential care facility or qualified retirement home to each individual designated
as a contact by the occupant who intends to vote by absentee ballot with the special
voting deputies.
Determinations of incompetency
Under current law, no person who is incapable of understanding the objective
of the elective process or who is under a guardianship may vote unless a court has
determined that the person is competent to vote. Current law also allows any voter
in a municipality to petition a circuit court to determine whether a person residing
in the municipality is incapable of understanding the objective of the elective
process. If the court determines that the person is incapable of such understanding,
the person is not eligible to register to vote or to vote. Current law requires the clerk
of the circuit court to communicate the court's determinations, in writing, to the
election officials who are responsible for determining challenges to registration and
voting that may be brought against the person.
This bill requires the circuit court to notify the Elections Commission, by email,
of the court's determination regarding incompetency and ineligibility to vote. Under
the bill, when the commission receives a determination of incompetency and
ineligibility to vote, the commission must, within two business days, change the
status of the voter subject to the determination to inactive on the official voter
registration list, note on the list that the voter is ineligible to vote, and notify the
voter and the voter's municipal clerk of the voter's change in status. The bill also
provides that if a court reviews a determination of incompetency and ineligibility to
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Campaigns and Elections, Ayes 8, Noes 0
Passed 8–0 Nov 7, 2023 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Campaigns and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 3
Passed 5–3 Nov 7, 2023 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Shared Revenue, Elections and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2
Passed 3–2 Jan 11, 2024 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Aye · 22
- André Jacque (1)
- Chris Kapenga (33)
- Cory Tomczyk (29)
- Dan Feyen (20)
- Dan Knodl (24)
- Devin LeMahieu (9)
- Duey Stroebel (20)
- Eric Wimberger (2)
- Howard Marklein (17)
- Jesse James (23)
- Joan Ballweg (14)
- John Jagler (13)
- Julian Bradley (28)
- Mary Felzkowski (12)
- Patrick Testin (24)
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara (19)
- Rob Cowles (2)
- Rob Hutton (5)
- Rob Stafsholt (10)
- Romaine Quinn (25)
- Steve Nass (11)
- Van Wanggaard (21)
Nay · 10
- Bob Wirch (22)
- Brad Pfaff (32)
- Chris Larson (7)
- Dianne Hesselbein (27)
- Jeff Smith (31)
- Kelda Roys (26)
- LaTonya Johnson (6)
- Mark Spreitzer (15)
- Melissa Agard (16)
- Tim Carpenter (3)
Full history
- Oct 26, 2023 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Kitchens, Allen, Binsfeld, Dittrich, Donovan, Edming, Goeben, Gundrum, Krug, Magnafici, Maxey, Michalski, Murphy, Mursau, Nedweski, O'Connor, Penterman and Rozar; cosponsored by Senators Quinn, Ballweg, Marklein and Nass
- Oct 26, 2023 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Campaigns and Elections
- Oct 31, 2023 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Nov 6, 2023 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Krug
- Nov 7, 2023 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Nov 7, 2023 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Committee on Campaigns and Elections
- Nov 7, 2023 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Campaigns and Elections, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Nov 7, 2023 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Campaigns and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 3
- Nov 7, 2023 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Nov 7, 2023 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 11-9-2023 by Committee on Rules
- Nov 8, 2023 · Assembly
Representative Gustafson added as a coauthor
- Nov 9, 2023 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Nov 9, 2023 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted
- Nov 9, 2023 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 9, 2023 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Nov 9, 2023 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Nov 9, 2023 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 10, 2023 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Nov 13, 2023 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Shared Revenue, Elections and Consumer Protection
- Dec 19, 2023 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 11, 2024 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 11, 2024 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Shared Revenue, Elections and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Jan 11, 2024 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 9, 2024 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-13-2024 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 13, 2024 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 13, 2024 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 13, 2024 · Senate
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
- Feb 13, 2024 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 22, Noes 10
- Feb 13, 2024 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 13, 2024 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Feb 15, 2024 · Assembly
LRB correction (Assembly Substitute Amendment 1)
- Feb 15, 2024 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 2-15-2024
- Mar 18, 2024 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 3-18-2024
- Mar 21, 2024 · Assembly
Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-21-2024
- May 14, 2024 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 5-14-2024 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
- May 15, 2024 · Assembly
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82