Skip to content
Bills from the 2023–24 session

Assembly Bill 572

Absentee voting in certain residential care facilities and retirement homes and court determinations of incompetency and ineligibility to vote

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Mar 21, 2024. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 26, 2023

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Nov 9, 2023

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 22 to 10

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Mar 21, 2024.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 15, 2024: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Absentee voting in certain facilities Under current law, under certain circumstances, a municipal clerk must dispatch special voting deputies to a residential care facility or qualified retirement home so that the occupants of the facility or home may cast an absentee ballot in person with the special voting deputies rather than vote in person at the appropriate polling place or request and complete an absentee ballot by mail. Under current law, a retirement home is a facility occupied as a primary residence by 10 or more unrelated individuals. A qualified retirement home is a retirement home that has a significant number of occupants who lack adequate transportation to the polling place, need assistance in voting, are aged 60 or over, or are indefinitely confined.

Under current law, the special voting deputies must arrange with the administrator of the residential care facility or qualified retirement home one or more convenient times to visit the facility or home. The administrator of the facility or home may, upon the request of a relative of an occupant of the facility or home, notify the relative of the time or times when special voting deputies will conduct absentee voting at the facility or home.

Read the full summary

This bill requires the administrator, or the administrator's designee, to provide notice by email of the dates and times when the deputies will be visiting the residential care facility or qualified retirement home to each individual designated as a contact by the occupant who intends to vote by absentee ballot with the special voting deputies.

Determinations of incompetency Under current law, no person who is incapable of understanding the objective of the elective process or who is under a guardianship may vote unless a court has determined that the person is competent to vote. Current law also allows any voter in a municipality to petition a circuit court to determine whether a person residing in the municipality is incapable of understanding the objective of the elective process. If the court determines that the person is incapable of such understanding, the person is not eligible to register to vote or to vote. Current law requires the clerk of the circuit court to communicate the court's determinations, in writing, to the election officials who are responsible for determining challenges to registration and voting that may be brought against the person.

This bill requires the circuit court to notify the Elections Commission, by email, of the court's determination regarding incompetency and ineligibility to vote. Under the bill, when the commission receives a determination of incompetency and ineligibility to vote, the commission must, within two business days, change the status of the voter subject to the determination to inactive on the official voter registration list, note on the list that the voter is ineligible to vote, and notify the voter and the voter's municipal clerk of the voter's change in status. The bill also provides that if a court reviews a determination of incompetency and ineligibility to vote and restores the voter's right to vote, upon receipt of that determination by email, the commission must, within two business days, notify the voter that the voter is eligible to vote and that the voter is required to complete a new registration to vote if the voter intends to vote. Under the bill, the clerk must examine the registration list before issuing a ballot to any potential voter.

Finally, under current law, an individual who votes at an election but who does not have the necessary qualifications to vote is guilty of a Class I felony. Under the bill, the penalty does not apply to an individual who has been determined ineligible to vote due to incompetency, but the individual's vote is excluded from the final tally for that election.

Who's behind it

18 representatives are its ⁠. All 18 are Republicans.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 23 names

Authors (18)

Signed on in support (5)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 0 · Nov 7, 2023

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Campaigns and Elections, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 3 · Nov 7, 2023

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Campaigns and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Shared Revenue vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Jan 11, 2024

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Shared Revenue, Elections and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 22 to 10 · Feb 13, 2024

See how each of the 32 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 15, 2024

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Mar 21, 2024

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Mar 18, 2024

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 13, 2024

    The Senate passed it too, 22 to 10.

  5. Jan 11, 2024

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  6. Dec 19, 2023

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Nov 13, 2023

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Shared Revenue, Elections and Consumer Protection.

  8. Nov 10, 2023

    The Senate received it.

  9. Nov 9, 2023

    The Assembly passed it.

  10. Nov 9, 2023

    The Assembly adopted it.

  11. Nov 8, 2023

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  12. Nov 7, 2023

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  13. Nov 7, 2023

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 3.

  14. Oct 31, 2023

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Oct 26, 2023

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections.

  16. Oct 26, 2023

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 26, 2023 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Kitchens, Allen, Binsfeld, Dittrich, Donovan, Edming, Goeben, Gundrum, Krug, Magnafici, Maxey, Michalski, Murphy, Mursau, Nedweski, O'Connor, Penterman and Rozar; cosponsored by Senators Quinn, Ballweg, Marklein and Nass

  2. Oct 26, 2023 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Campaigns and Elections

  3. Oct 31, 2023 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Nov 6, 2023 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Krug

  5. Nov 7, 2023 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Nov 7, 2023 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Committee on Campaigns and Elections

  7. Nov 7, 2023 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Campaigns and Elections, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  8. Nov 7, 2023 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Campaigns and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  9. Nov 7, 2023 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Nov 7, 2023 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 11-9-2023 by Committee on Rules

  11. Nov 8, 2023 · Assembly

    Representative Gustafson added as a coauthor

  12. Nov 9, 2023 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Nov 9, 2023 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

  14. Nov 9, 2023 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Nov 9, 2023 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  16. Nov 9, 2023 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  17. Nov 9, 2023 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Nov 10, 2023 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  19. Nov 13, 2023 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Shared Revenue, Elections and Consumer Protection

  20. Dec 19, 2023 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  21. Jan 11, 2024 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  22. Jan 11, 2024 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Shared Revenue, Elections and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  23. Jan 11, 2024 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  24. Feb 9, 2024 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-13-2024 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  25. Feb 13, 2024 · Senate

    Read a second time

  26. Feb 13, 2024 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  27. Feb 13, 2024 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  28. Feb 13, 2024 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 22, Noes 10

  29. Feb 13, 2024 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  30. Feb 13, 2024 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  31. Feb 15, 2024 · Assembly

    LRB correction (Assembly Substitute Amendment 1)

  32. Feb 15, 2024 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 2-15-2024

  33. Mar 18, 2024 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 3-18-2024

  34. Mar 21, 2024 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-21-2024

  35. May 14, 2024 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-14-2024 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  36. May 15, 2024 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote