Skip to content
Bills from the 2023–24 session

Assembly Bill 64

Nitrate contamination and the well compensation grant program. (FE)

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 23, 2023

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 15, 2024: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill expands eligibility for nitrate-contaminated wells under the well compensation grant program administered by the Department of Natural Resources.

Under current law, an individual owner or renter of a contaminated private well, subject to eligibility requirements, may apply for a grant from DNR to cover a portion of the costs to treat the water, reconstruct the well, construct a new well, connect to a public water supply, or fill and seal the well.

Read the full summary

Under current law, a well that is contaminated only by nitrates is eligible for a grant only if the well is a water supply for livestock, is used at least three months in each year to provide more than 100 gallons of water per day for consumption by livestock, and contains nitrates in excess of 40 parts per million. Under the bill, the only eligibility requirement for a well that is contaminated only by nitrates is that the well is used at least three months in each year.

Current law requires DNR to allocate money for payments of claims under the program according to the order in which claims are received. The bill retains this requirement but provides that, among claims for contamination only by nitrates, DNR must allocate payments according to a specified priority ranking.

Also under current law, a residential well that is contaminated only by bacteria is not eligible for a grant unless the well is in an area that is contaminated by fecal bacteria and the contamination is caused by livestock. The bill eliminates this restriction.

The bill also requires DNR to award grants for the remediation method that is most effective for the health and welfare of the claimant. Finally, the bill requires DNR to report to the Joint Committee on Finance after the end of each fiscal year on the number of applicants under the well compensation program and the number and amounts of grants provided during that fiscal year.

Who's behind it

27 representatives are its ⁠. 17 are Republicans and 10 are Democrats.

9 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 36 names

Authors (27)

Signed on in support (9)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Agriculture vote to recommend it

Passed, 14 to 0 · Mar 13, 2024

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 14, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 15, 2024

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 13, 2024

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Mar 13, 2024

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 14 to 0.

  4. Jan 10, 2024

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  5. Apr 4, 2023

    The committee held a public hearing.

  6. Mar 14, 2023

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Feb 27, 2023

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  8. Feb 23, 2023

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Agriculture.

  9. Feb 23, 2023

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 23, 2023 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Kitchens, Novak, Shankland, Krug, C. Anderson, J. Anderson, Andraca, Armstrong, Baldeh, Behnke, Considine, Donovan, Emerson, Green, Joers, Knodl, Moses, Mursau, Oldenburg, Petryk, Plumer, Rozar, Snodgrass, Snyder, Spiros, Subeck and O'Connor; cosponsored by Senators Cowles, Testin, Ballweg, Cabral-Guevara, Pfaff, Roys and Spreitzer

  2. Feb 23, 2023 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture

  3. Feb 27, 2023 · Assembly

    Representative Jacobson added as a coauthor

  4. Mar 14, 2023 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Apr 4, 2023 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Apr 11, 2023 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Jan 10, 2024 · Assembly

    Representative Gustafson added as a coauthor

  8. Mar 13, 2024 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 14, Noes 0

  9. Mar 13, 2024 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Apr 15, 2024 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote