Skip to content

Bills · 2023-2024 Regular Session

AB 644

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: applications for full-time open enrollment. (FE)

Family School — Attendance Teacher

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under the full-time open enrollment program (OEP), a pupil may attend a

public school in a school district other than the pupil's resident school district

(nonresident school district). Under current law, the standard OEP application

procedure requires a pupil's parent to apply to a nonresident school district during

the spring semester immediately preceding the school year in which the pupil wishes

to attend the nonresident school district. Current law also provides an alternative

application procedure that allows a pupil's parent to apply to a nonresident school

district at any time during the school year, if certain circumstances apply, such as the

pupil moved into this state, the pupil has been the victim of repeated bullying or

harassment, or the pupil's parent, the resident school board, and the nonresident

school board agree that attending school in the nonresident school district is in the

best interests of the pupil.

This bill creates an alternative OEP application procedure for pupils who have

a parent who is employed as a teacher in the nonresident school district to which the

application is made. The application procedure created in the bill is available at any

time during the school year and, if a pupil is accepted under the procedure, the pupil

may immediately begin attending public school in the nonresident school district.

However, under the bill, if the pupil's parent is no longer employed by the

nonresident school board as a teacher or an administrator, the nonresident school

board may require the pupil to reapply using the standard or existing alternative

OEP application procedure.

Current law limits the criteria that a nonresident school district may use to

accept or reject applications under the OEP. One of the criteria that a nonresident

school district may use is the availability of space in the schools, programs, classes,

or grades in the nonresident school district. Current law requires each school board

to determine the availability of regular and special education spaces it has for

nonresident pupils to attend school under the OEP at the school board's regular

January meeting in the preceding school year. Under the application procedure

created in the bill, a nonresident school board may accept a pupil's application even

if the result is that the nonresident school board exceeds the number of spaces it

determined were available for nonresident pupils in a school, program, class, or

grade in the nonresident school district. In other words, the space limitations

determined by the nonresident school board do not apply to these applications. The

bill also adds whether a pupil's parent is employed as a teacher by the nonresident

school district to the criteria that a nonresident school district may use to accept or

reject OEP applications.

Finally, current law limits the number of nonresident school boards to which

a pupil may apply to attend a public school in a nonresident school district under the

OEP. Specifically, under current law, OEP applications for a pupil may be submitted

to no more than three nonresident school boards in any school year. However,

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Brandtjen (R) , Dittrich (R) , Donovan (R) , Goeben (R) , Kitchens (R) , Melotik (R) , Michalski (R) , Murphy (R) , O'Connor (R) , Penterman (R) , Rettinger (R) , Rozar (R) , S. Johnson (R)

2 cosponsors

Knodl (R) , Moses (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 11, Noes 3

Passed 11–3 Jan 18, 2024 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Nov 8, 2023 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Penterman, Melotik, Brandtjen, Dittrich, Donovan, Goeben, S. Johnson, Kitchens, Michalski, Murphy, O'Connor, Rettinger and Rozar; cosponsored by Senator Knodl

  2. Nov 8, 2023 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Education

  3. Nov 22, 2023 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Dec 5, 2023 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 4, 2024 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Jan 18, 2024 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 11, Noes 3

  7. Jan 18, 2024 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Jan 24, 2024 · Assembly

    Representative Moses added as a coauthor

  9. Feb 15, 2024 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-20-2024 by Committee on Rules

  10. Feb 20, 2024 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Feb 20, 2024 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  12. Feb 20, 2024 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  13. Feb 20, 2024 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Feb 20, 2024 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  15. Feb 21, 2024 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  16. Feb 26, 2024 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Education

  17. Apr 15, 2024 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1