Assembly Bill 675
The Public Service Commission's website and an annual report relating to its dockets
Stopped in committee
It never got a , so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Nov 27, 2023
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. No public hearing was held.
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 15, 2024: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill establishes certain requirements of the Public Service Commission with respect to its website and the issuance of an annual report relating to PSC dockets. A “docket” is defined as an investigation, proceeding, or other matter opened by a vote of PSC, except for rule making.
Under the bill, PSC must include, with at least the first reference to a public utility in any page or document PSC produces and publishes on its website, all names by which the public is likely to know the utility, such as the name of a parent company.
Read the full summary Show less
The bill requires PSC, in its website that offers public access to docket information, to establish a function that allows a person to sign up to receive email notifications relating to a single docket or a single utility and to specify the type of activity relating to that docket or utility about which the person would like to receive notifications.
The bill requires PSC to produce a report each year that shows each docket that either was opened or had a decision issued on it during the prior calendar year, organized into the following two lists: one list that includes dockets relating to investor-owned utilities and one list that includes dockets relating to municipal water, electric, gas and sewer utilities. Under the bill, PSC must organize each list by utility and include for each docket the docket identification number, the title of the proceeding, the number of public comments received in the docket if a public comment period was held, the date of the application, and, if applicable, the dates of the notice of investigation and the decision.
The bill also requires the annual report to include for each docket in which a PSC decision was issued during the prior calendar year an opinion on the likely impact on ratepayers, based on how the decision will impact public utility costs.
Under the bill, each opinion must state whether the impact on public utility costs, and therefore on ratepayers, is likely to be positive (will lower public utility costs), negligible (will have little to no impact), negative (will increase the public utility costs), or other (will have both increased and decreased costs—for example, if the early retirement of a plant increases costs but the use of environmental trust financing in that retirement decreases costs). The bill provides that such an opinion is for informational purposes only, is not on the merits of the proceeding, and is not binding on future PSC decisions.
The bill authorizes PSC to allow for public comments on these reports, including comments from the public utility referenced in the report, and to adjust the reports based on comments received. The bill requires PSC, no later than April 30 of the year after the year that is the subject of the report, to submit the reports to the standing committees of the legislature with jurisdiction over energy and utilities and to make the reports available to the public on PSC's website.
Who's behind it
12 representatives are its . 11 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.
3 more lawmakers .
See all 15 names Hide the names
Authors (12)
- Samba Baldeh · Democrat, Assembly
- Chanz Green · Republican, Assembly
- Gus Gustafson · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Krug · Republican, Assembly
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- Adam Neylon · Republican, Assembly
- Jerry O'Connor · Republican, Assembly
- Nik Rettinger · Republican, Assembly
- Donna Rozar · Republican, Assembly
- John Spiros · Republican, Assembly
- Paul Tittl · Republican, Assembly
- Travis Tranel · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (3)
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Rob Cowles · Republican, Senate
- Duey Stroebel · Republican, Senate
What happened
-
Apr 15, 2024
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Nov 27, 2023
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities.
-
Nov 27, 2023
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Nov 27, 2023 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Neylon, Gustafson, Tittl, Baldeh, Green, Krug, Murphy, O'Connor, Rettinger, Rozar, Spiros and Tranel; cosponsored by Senators Cowles, Stroebel and Ballweg
- Nov 27, 2023 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Energy and Utilities
- Apr 15, 2024 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor