Bills · 2023-2024 Regular Session
Relating to: the tuition grant program for national guard members administered by the Department of Military Affairs. (FE)
Military affairs department of Military personnel National guard
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes changes to the tuition grant program administered by the
Department of Military Affairs relating to eligibility and timing of higher education
grants paid to national guard members and to administration of the program.
Under current law, DMA awards tuition grants to national guard members to
reimburse them for higher education tuition costs if certain eligibility criteria are
satisfied. The amount of the tuition grant payment is equal to 100 percent of the
actual tuition charged by the guard member's school or 100 percent of the maximum
resident undergraduate tuition charged by the University of Wisconsin-Madison for
a comparable number of credits, whichever amount is less. Among the eligibility
criteria, a national guard member may not receive a tuition reimbursement grant if,
at the time of completion of the semester to be reimbursed, the guard member fails
to achieve a minimum grade point average of 2.0, fails to be an actively drilling guard
member, or fails to be a guard member in good standing. DMA must require a
national guard member to repay the amount of a tuition grant if the national guard
member is separated from the national guard for misconduct, including being absent
without leave for more than nine unit training assemblies. If an eligible student's
school has certified to DMA that the student has achieved at least a 2.0 GPA for the
semester for which reimbursement is sought, DMA must pay the tuition grant
amount to the student within 30 days after receiving this certification.
The bill allows an enrolled student who is an eligible national guard member
to apply for a tuition grant prior to completion of the semester. The national guard
member is not eligible for payment of the tuition grant if, at the time of application
for the grant, the guard member is not achieving satisfactory academic progress in
his or her school, is not an actively drilling guard member, or is not a guard member
in good standing. If an eligible guard member's school has certified to DMA that he
or she is achieving satisfactory academic progress, DMA must pay the tuition grant
amount to the student's school on the student's behalf, rather than directly to the
student, within 30 days after receiving this certification. The bill also requires DMA
to require a national guard member to repay a tuition grant if, at the end of the term
for which the tuition grant is paid, the national guard member has failed to achieve
satisfactory academic progress, failed to be an actively drilling guard member, or
failed to be a guard member in good standing. A school must notify DMA if the
national guard member who received the tuition grant failed to achieve satisfactory
academic progress at the end of the term. If a national guard member is required to
repay a tuition grant for any reason, DMA may require the guard member's school
to recover from the guard member the amount of the tuition grant and remit it to
DMA.
The bill also requires DMA to consult and coordinate with higher education
institutions in establishing a process for distributing tuition grants that maximizes
administrative efficiency for these schools in applying tuition grants to student
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Allen (R) , Bare (D) , Brandtjen (R) , C. Anderson (D) , Conley (D) , Considine (D) , Dittrich (R) , Duchow (R) , Edming (R) , Emerson (D) , Goeben (R) , Goyke (D) , Gustafson (R) , Haywood (D) , Jacobson (D) , Joers (D) , Madison (D) , Magnafici (R) , Maxey (R) , Michalski (R) , Murphy (R) , Mursau (R) , O'Connor (R) , Ortiz-Velez (D) , Palmeri (D) , Ratcliff (D) , S. Johnson (R) , Shankland (D) , Sinicki (D) , Subeck (D) , Tittl (R)
8 cosponsors
Cabral-Guevara (R) , Carpenter (D) , Hesselbein (D) , James (R) , Marklein (R) , Nass (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Testin (R)
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 15, Noes 0
Passed 15–0 Jan 30, 2024 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Dec 8, 2023 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Duchow, Joers, Allen, C. Anderson, Bare, Brandtjen, Conley, Considine, Dittrich, Edming, Emerson, Goeben, Goyke, Gustafson, Jacobson, S. Johnson, Madison, Magnafici, Maxey, Michalski, Murphy, Mursau, O'Connor, Ortiz-Velez, Palmeri, Ratcliff, Shankland, Sinicki, Subeck, Tittl and Haywood; cosponsored by Senators Testin, Hesselbein, Cabral-Guevara, Carpenter, James, Marklein, Nass and Spreitzer
- Dec 8, 2023 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs
- Jan 4, 2024 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 11, 2024 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 25, 2024 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 30, 2024 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Jan 30, 2024 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 15, 2024 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-20-2024 by Committee on Rules
- Feb 20, 2024 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Apr 15, 2024 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1