Skip to content

Bills · 2023-2024 Regular Session

AB 808

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: supervision of local bridge projects funded under certain local bridge maintenance programs. (FE)

Bridge Building Road — Construction and repair Transportation department of — Roads

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, the Department of Transportation administers a local

bridge program to reconstruct and rehabilitate seriously deteriorating local bridges

(local bridge program). Under the program, political subdivisions apply to the county

in which they are located for placement on the county's list of projects under the

program. DOT allocates funds to counties based on the ratio between the estimated

cost of reconstructing or rehabilitating qualifying bridges in that county and the

estimated cost of reconstructing or rehabilitating qualifying bridges in the state.

DOT supervises the construction of projects under the program and provides 80

percent of the project's costs with local funds providing the other 20 percent.

Also under current law, a town that has voted to construct or repair a bridge or

culvert on a highway maintained by the town may petition the county in which the

town is located for shared funding of the project (county bridge aid). With certain

exceptions, upon an adequate petition, the county must pay one-half of the cost of

construction or repair. In general, the county highway committee and the town board

supervise projects under this program.

This bill specifies that county bridge aid may be used to fund the local share of

a local bridge program project and that, if county bridge aid is used for this purpose,

DOT supervises the project.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Brandtjen (R) , Brooks (R) , Dittrich (R) , Edming (R) , Gundrum (R) , Hurd (R) , Jacobson (D) , Mursau (R) , Penterman (R) , Rozar (R) , S. Johnson (R) , Schmidt (R)

5 cosponsors

Ballweg (R) , Cowles (R) , James (R) , Marklein (R) , Spreitzer (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 0

Passed 12–0 Feb 14, 2024 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Dec 8, 2023 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Brooks, Rozar, Brandtjen, Dittrich, Edming, Gundrum, Hurd, Jacobson, Mursau, Penterman, Schmidt and S. Johnson; cosponsored by Senators James, Ballweg, Cowles, Marklein and Spreitzer

  2. Dec 8, 2023 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation

  3. Jan 19, 2024 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 30, 2024 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 6, 2024 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 14, 2024 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  7. Feb 14, 2024 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Feb 15, 2024 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-20-2024 by Committee on Rules

  9. Feb 20, 2024 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  10. Apr 15, 2024 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1