Skip to content
Bills from the 2023–24 session

Assembly Bill 90

Third-party processing of applications for occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants and granting rulemaking authority. (FE)

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Jan 16, 2024, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 8, 2023

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jan 16, 2024

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 15, 2024: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill requires the Department of Safety and Professional Services to contract with a third-party entity to receive applications for licensure as an occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant, to collect and retain application fees, to determine whether an applicant has an arrest or conviction record, and to determine whether the applicant has met all other requirements for licensure. If the third-party entity determines that an applicant meets all of the requirements for licensure, the bill requires the third-party entity to inform the Occupational Therapy Affiliated Credentialing Board of its determination within 10 days from the day that the determination is made. The bill then requires the Occupational Therapy Affiliated Credentialing Board to promptly issue a license as an occupational therapist or an occupational therapy assistant to any applicant that the third-party entity determined was eligible under the bill. The bill provides a similar third-party process for applicants for licensure for a limited period to practice occupational therapy in association with an occupational therapist or for licensure for a limited period to assist in the practice of occupational therapy under the supervision of an occupational therapist.

This bill allows any third-party entity contracted under the bill to set and periodically update the required fee for applications for licensure described under the bill. At least 60 days before any fee change goes into effect, the bill requires the third-party entity to submit a request to change the fee to the Joint Committee on Finance along with the third-party entity's current operating budget and an estimation of the change in total fees to be received by the third-party entity if the fee change were to go into effect. The bill allows the Joint Committee on Finance to hold a hearing on any requested fee change. If the Joint Committee on Finance holds a hearing on a requested fee change, the bill requires the third-party entity to adopt any fee determined by the joint committee. Further, if the Joint Committee on Finance determines at any time that the third-party entity has a budget surplus that is greater than 10 percent of the amount of fees that the third-party entity receives in a year, the joint committee may order the third-party entity to lower the fee to a fee determined by the joint committee.

Read the full summary

Before entering into a contract with a third-party entity, the bill requires that any proposed contract be submitted to the Joint Committee on Finance for approval.

Once a contract is approved, the bill requires the third-party entity to annually submit a report to the legislature detailing the performance of the third-party entity.

The bill permits DSPS or any person delegated by the legislature to inspect and examine all records relating to the operations of the third-party entity.

Who's behind it

22 representatives are its ⁠. All 22 are Republicans.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 28 names

Authors (22)

Signed on in support (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 3 · Oct 5, 2023

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 6, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 15, 2024

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jan 19, 2024

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Licensing, Constitution and Federalism.

  3. Jan 16, 2024

    The Senate received it.

  4. Jan 16, 2024

    The Assembly passed it.

  5. Oct 5, 2023

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Oct 5, 2023

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 3.

  7. Sep 21, 2023

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Mar 15, 2023

    The committee held a public hearing.

  9. Mar 10, 2023

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  10. Mar 8, 2023

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform.

  11. Mar 8, 2023

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 8, 2023 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Gustafson, Sortwell, Macco, Allen, Behnke, Binsfeld, Bodden, Dittrich, Green, Gundrum, Kitchens, Krug, Mursau, O'Connor, Rettinger, Rodriguez, Schmidt, Schraa, Schutt, Steffen, Tusler and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Stafsholt, Testin, Cabral-Guevara, Feyen and Wanggaard

  2. Mar 8, 2023 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform

  3. Mar 10, 2023 · Assembly

    Representative Knodl added as a coauthor

  4. Mar 15, 2023 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Sep 6, 2023 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Sep 21, 2023 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Oct 5, 2023 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 6, Noes 3

  8. Oct 5, 2023 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Jan 11, 2024 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-16-2024 by Committee on Rules

  10. Jan 16, 2024 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  11. Jan 16, 2024 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  12. Jan 16, 2024 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  13. Jan 16, 2024 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  14. Jan 16, 2024 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  15. Jan 16, 2024 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  16. Jan 19, 2024 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Licensing, Constitution and Federalism

  17. Apr 15, 2024 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote