Skip to content
Bills from the 2023–24 session

Assembly Bill 96

Developer-financed tax incremental districts

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Jun 14, 2023, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 8, 2023

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jun 14, 2023

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 15, 2024: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill allows cities, villages, and certain towns to create developer-financed tax incremental districts, which are excepted from the general rule that the equalized value of taxable property of a new or amended tax incremental district (TID) plus the value increment of all existing TIDs in a city or village may not exceed 12 percent of the total equalized value of taxable property in the city or village (12 percent rule) and the requirement that all areas of a TID be contiguous.

Under current law, cities and villages may use tax incremental financing (TIF) to encourage development in the city or village. In general, under TIF, a city or village pays for improvements in a TID and then collects tax moneys attributable to all taxing jurisdictions on the increased property value in the TID for a certain period of time to pay for the improvements. Ideally, after the period of time, the city or village will have been repaid for its initial investment and the property tax base in the TID will have permanently increased in value.

Read the full summary

In general and in brief, a city or village makes use of TIF using the following procedure:

1. The city or village designates an area as a TID and creates a project plan laying out the expenditures that the city or village will make within the TID.

2. The Department of Revenue establishes the “base value” of the TID. This value is the equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation.

3. Each year thereafter, the “value increment” of the property within the TID is determined by subtracting the base value from the current value of property within the TID. The portion of taxes collected on any positive value increment is collected by the city or village for use solely for the project costs of the TID. The taxes collected by the city or village on positive value increments include taxes that would have been collected by other taxing jurisdictions, such as counties or school districts, were the TID not created.

4. Tax increments are collected until the city or village has recovered all of its project costs or until the TID reaches its statutory termination date.

This bill allows a city or village to create a TID designated as a developer-financed TID. To create a TID as a developer-financed TID, the local legislative body must adopt a resolution making certain findings, and the joint review board must approve the creation of the TID as a developer-financed TID. The following are the findings that must be included in the resolution:

1. That all project costs of the TID will be paid directly from tax increments or financed by a developer.

2. That the aggregate of all payments made to a developer providing financing for a developer-financed TID will not exceed an amount equal to 90 percent of the estimated tax increments to be generated by the TID.

Under the bill, developer-financed TIDs differ from other TIDs in that:

1. The 12 percent rule does not apply.

2. A developer-financed TID may contain noncontiguous areas.

3. All project costs must be paid directly from value increments generated by the developer-financed TID or financed by the developer.

4. A city or village may share not more than 10 percent of the positive tax increments allocated for a developer-financed TID in a year with any other TID created by that city.

5. If a developer secures a loan from a private lender to finance project costs, the city and the parties to the loan must agree that the debt is the responsibility of the borrower and not the city.

6. The city may not issue tax incremental bonds or notes for financing a developer-financed TID.

Under current law, towns have much more limited authority to use TIF than do cities and villages. This bill allows towns that are adjacent to a city and that have a population of more than 4,000 to create developer-financed TIDs if the project costs are used solely for the construction of housing-related infrastructure.

Who's behind it

7 representatives are its ⁠. 6 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 13 names

Authors (7)

Signed on in support (6)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate vote on an amendment

Passed, 13 to 1 · Jun 7, 2023

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 13, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate vote on an amendment

Passed, 13 to 1 · Jun 7, 2023

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 13, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate vote to recommend it

Passed, 12 to 3 · Jun 7, 2023

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 12, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 15, 2024

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jun 14, 2023

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Government Operations.

  3. Jun 14, 2023

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  4. Jun 14, 2023

    The Senate received it.

  5. Jun 14, 2023

    The Assembly passed it.

  6. Jun 14, 2023

    The Assembly adopted it.

  7. Jun 13, 2023 to Jun 14, 2023

    3 more representatives signed on in support.

  8. Jun 7, 2023

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  9. Jun 7, 2023

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 3.

  10. May 18, 2023

    The committee held a public hearing.

  11. Mar 8, 2023

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate.

  12. Mar 8, 2023

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 8, 2023 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Plumer, Armstrong, Gundrum, Novak, O'Connor, Ohnstad and Spiros; cosponsored by Senators Feyen, Cowles and Quinn

  2. Mar 8, 2023 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Housing and Real Estate

  3. May 16, 2023 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Plumer

  4. May 18, 2023 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. May 24, 2023 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Plumer

  6. Jun 6, 2023 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Jun 7, 2023 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 13, Noes 1

  8. Jun 7, 2023 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 13, Noes 1

  9. Jun 7, 2023 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 12, Noes 3

  10. Jun 7, 2023 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Jun 7, 2023 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 6-14-2023 by Committee on Rules

  12. Jun 13, 2023 · Assembly

    Representative Joers added as a coauthor

  13. Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  14. Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly

    Representatives Cabrera and C. Anderson added as coauthors

  15. Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  16. Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 adopted

  17. Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  19. Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  20. Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Jun 14, 2023 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  22. Jun 14, 2023 · Senate

    Representative Haywood added as a coauthor

  23. Jun 14, 2023 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Government Operations

  24. Apr 15, 2024 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote