Assembly Bill 96
Developer-financed tax incremental districts
Passed the Assembly, then stopped
The Assembly passed it on Jun 14, 2023, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to . To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Mar 8, 2023
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Jun 14, 2023
-
Senate vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 15, 2024: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill allows cities, villages, and certain towns to create developer-financed tax incremental districts, which are excepted from the general rule that the equalized value of taxable property of a new or amended tax incremental district (TID) plus the value increment of all existing TIDs in a city or village may not exceed 12 percent of the total equalized value of taxable property in the city or village (12 percent rule) and the requirement that all areas of a TID be contiguous.
Under current law, cities and villages may use tax incremental financing (TIF) to encourage development in the city or village. In general, under TIF, a city or village pays for improvements in a TID and then collects tax moneys attributable to all taxing jurisdictions on the increased property value in the TID for a certain period of time to pay for the improvements. Ideally, after the period of time, the city or village will have been repaid for its initial investment and the property tax base in the TID will have permanently increased in value.
Read the full summary Show less
In general and in brief, a city or village makes use of TIF using the following procedure:
1. The city or village designates an area as a TID and creates a project plan laying out the expenditures that the city or village will make within the TID.
2. The Department of Revenue establishes the “base value” of the TID. This value is the equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation.
3. Each year thereafter, the “value increment” of the property within the TID is determined by subtracting the base value from the current value of property within the TID. The portion of taxes collected on any positive value increment is collected by the city or village for use solely for the project costs of the TID. The taxes collected by the city or village on positive value increments include taxes that would have been collected by other taxing jurisdictions, such as counties or school districts, were the TID not created.
4. Tax increments are collected until the city or village has recovered all of its project costs or until the TID reaches its statutory termination date.
This bill allows a city or village to create a TID designated as a developer-financed TID. To create a TID as a developer-financed TID, the local legislative body must adopt a resolution making certain findings, and the joint review board must approve the creation of the TID as a developer-financed TID. The following are the findings that must be included in the resolution:
1. That all project costs of the TID will be paid directly from tax increments or financed by a developer.
2. That the aggregate of all payments made to a developer providing financing for a developer-financed TID will not exceed an amount equal to 90 percent of the estimated tax increments to be generated by the TID.
Under the bill, developer-financed TIDs differ from other TIDs in that:
1. The 12 percent rule does not apply.
2. A developer-financed TID may contain noncontiguous areas.
3. All project costs must be paid directly from value increments generated by the developer-financed TID or financed by the developer.
4. A city or village may share not more than 10 percent of the positive tax increments allocated for a developer-financed TID in a year with any other TID created by that city.
5. If a developer secures a loan from a private lender to finance project costs, the city and the parties to the loan must agree that the debt is the responsibility of the borrower and not the city.
6. The city may not issue tax incremental bonds or notes for financing a developer-financed TID.
Under current law, towns have much more limited authority to use TIF than do cities and villages. This bill allows towns that are adjacent to a city and that have a population of more than 4,000 to create developer-financed TIDs if the project costs are used solely for the construction of housing-related infrastructure.
Who's behind it
7 representatives are its . 6 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.
6 more lawmakers .
See all 13 names Hide the names
Authors (7)
- Dave Armstrong · Republican, Assembly
- Rick Gundrum · Republican, Assembly
- Todd Novak · Republican, Assembly
- Jerry O'Connor · Republican, Assembly
- Tod Ohnstad · Democrat, Assembly
- Jon Plumer · Republican, Assembly
- John Spiros · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (6)
- Cabrera and C. Anderson
- Rob Cowles · Republican, Senate
- Dan Feyen · Republican, Senate
- Kalan Haywood · Democrat, Assembly
- Alex Joers · Democrat, Assembly
- Romaine Quinn · Republican, Senate
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate vote on an amendment
Passed, 13 to 1 · Jun 7, 2023
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 13, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate vote on an amendment
Passed, 13 to 1 · Jun 7, 2023
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 13, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate vote to recommend it
Passed, 12 to 3 · Jun 7, 2023
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 12, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 15, 2024
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Jun 14, 2023
Sent to the Senate Committee on Government Operations.
-
Jun 14, 2023
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Jun 14, 2023
The Senate received it.
-
Jun 14, 2023
The Assembly passed it.
-
Jun 14, 2023
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Jun 13, 2023 to Jun 14, 2023
3 more representatives signed on in support.
-
Jun 7, 2023
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Jun 7, 2023
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 3.
-
May 18, 2023
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Mar 8, 2023
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate.
-
Mar 8, 2023
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Mar 8, 2023 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Plumer, Armstrong, Gundrum, Novak, O'Connor, Ohnstad and Spiros; cosponsored by Senators Feyen, Cowles and Quinn
- Mar 8, 2023 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Housing and Real Estate
- May 16, 2023 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Plumer
- May 18, 2023 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- May 24, 2023 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Plumer
- Jun 6, 2023 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jun 7, 2023 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 13, Noes 1
- Jun 7, 2023 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 13, Noes 1
- Jun 7, 2023 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 12, Noes 3
- Jun 7, 2023 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jun 7, 2023 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 6-14-2023 by Committee on Rules
- Jun 13, 2023 · Assembly
Representative Joers added as a coauthor
- Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly
Representatives Cabrera and C. Anderson added as coauthors
- Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
- Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 adopted
- Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jun 14, 2023 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Jun 14, 2023 · Senate
Representative Haywood added as a coauthor
- Jun 14, 2023 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Government Operations
- Apr 15, 2024 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote