Bills · 2023-2024 Regular Session
Relating to: developer-financed tax incremental districts.
Municipality Property tax Town Village
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill allows cities, villages, and certain towns to create developer-financed
tax incremental districts, which are excepted from the general rule that the
equalized value of taxable property of a new or amended tax incremental district
(TID) plus the value increment of all existing TIDs in a city or village may not exceed
12 percent of the total equalized value of taxable property in the city or village (12
percent rule) and the requirement that all areas of a TID be contiguous.
Under current law, cities and villages may use tax incremental financing (TIF)
to encourage development in the city or village. In general, under TIF, a city or
village pays for improvements in a TID and then collects tax moneys attributable to
all taxing jurisdictions on the increased property value in the TID for a certain period
of time to pay for the improvements. Ideally, after the period of time, the city or
village will have been repaid for its initial investment and the property tax base in
the TID will have permanently increased in value.
In general and in brief, a city or village makes use of TIF using the following
procedure:
1. The city or village designates an area as a TID and creates a project plan
laying out the expenditures that the city or village will make within the TID.
2. The Department of Revenue establishes the “base value” of the TID. This
value is the equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its
creation.
3. Each year thereafter, the “value increment” of the property within the TID
is determined by subtracting the base value from the current value of property
within the TID. The portion of taxes collected on any positive value increment is
collected by the city or village for use solely for the project costs of the TID. The taxes
collected by the city or village on positive value increments include taxes that would
have been collected by other taxing jurisdictions, such as counties or school districts,
were the TID not created.
4. Tax increments are collected until the city or village has recovered all of its
project costs or until the TID reaches its statutory termination date.
This bill allows a city or village to create a TID designated as a
developer-financed TID. To create a TID as a developer-financed TID, the local
legislative body must adopt a resolution making certain findings, and the joint
review board must approve the creation of the TID as a developer-financed TID. The
following are the findings that must be included in the resolution:
1. That all project costs of the TID will be paid directly from tax increments or
financed by a developer.
2. That the aggregate of all payments made to a developer providing financing
for a developer-financed TID will not exceed an amount equal to 90 percent of the
estimated tax increments to be generated by the TID.
Under the bill, developer-financed TIDs differ from other TIDs in that:
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 13, Noes 1
Passed 13–1 Jun 7, 2023 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 13, Noes 1
Passed 13–1 Jun 7, 2023 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 12, Noes 3
Passed 12–3 Jun 7, 2023 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 8, 2023 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Plumer, Armstrong, Gundrum, Novak, O'Connor, Ohnstad and Spiros; cosponsored by Senators Feyen, Cowles and Quinn
- Mar 8, 2023 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Housing and Real Estate
- May 16, 2023 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Plumer
- May 18, 2023 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- May 24, 2023 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Plumer
- Jun 6, 2023 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jun 7, 2023 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 6-14-2023 by Committee on Rules
- Jun 7, 2023 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 13, Noes 1
- Jun 7, 2023 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 13, Noes 1
- Jun 7, 2023 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 12, Noes 3
- Jun 7, 2023 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jun 13, 2023 · Assembly
Representative Joers added as a coauthor
- Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly
Representatives Cabrera and C. Anderson added as coauthors
- Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
- Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 adopted
- Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jun 14, 2023 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Jun 14, 2023 · Senate
Representative Haywood added as a coauthor
- Jun 14, 2023 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Government Operations
- Apr 15, 2024 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1